9f8938b89a
In tst_QDateTime::springForward(), we test correct handling of times in the gap; these are formally invalid and a mktime() implementation may reasonably reject them causing our date-time code to produce an invalid result. So handle that case gracefully in the tests, only insisting on consistency between the two ways of preparing the date. In one test, package the repeated code I was going to adapt into a macro to save repeitition. Task-number: QTBUG-68832 Task-number: QTBUG-68839 Change-Id: Ib8a16ff007f4e75ab2ccff05b1ccf00a45e50dc8 Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| auto | ||
| baselineserver | ||
| benchmarks | ||
| global | ||
| manual | ||
| shared | ||
| README | ||
| tests.pro | ||
This directory contains autotests and benchmarks based on Qt Test. In order
to run the autotests reliably, you need to configure a desktop to match the
test environment that these tests are written for.
Linux X11:
* The user must be logged in to an active desktop; you can't run the
autotests without a valid DISPLAY that allows X11 connections.
* The tests are run against a KDE3 or KDE4 desktop.
* Window manager uses "click to focus", and not "focus follows mouse". Many
tests move the mouse cursor around and expect this to not affect focus
and activation.
* Disable "click to activate", i.e., when a window is opened, the window
manager should automatically activate it (give it input focus) and not
wait for the user to click the window.