7b7c37ab94
Some quick benchmarks against GNU coreutils 8.21 and OpenSSL 1.0.1e
(time in µs; time for coreutils and OpenSSL include the loading of the
executable):
Qt Coreutils OpenSSL
n SHA-1 SHA-224 SHA-512 SHA-1 SHA-224 SHA-512 SHA-1 SHA-224 SHA-512
0 0 0 0 717 716 700 2532 2553 2522
64k 120 484 381 927 1074 966 2618 2782 2694
Diff 120 484 381 210 358 266 86 229 172
The numbers for Qt are pretty stable and vary very little; the numbers
for the other two vary quite a bit, since they involve launching and
executing separate processes. We can take the lesson that we're in the
same ballpark for SHA-1 and we should investigate whether our SHA2
implementation is sufficiently optimized.
Change-Id: Ib081d002ed57c4f43741eca45ff5cd13b97b6276
Reviewed-by: Richard J. Moore <rich@kde.org>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| auto | ||
| baselineserver | ||
| benchmarks | ||
| global | ||
| manual | ||
| shared | ||
| README | ||
| tests.pro | ||
This directory contains autotests and benchmarks based on Qt Test. In order
to run the autotests reliably, you need to configure a desktop to match the
test environment that these tests are written for.
Linux X11:
* The user must be logged in to an active desktop; you can't run the
autotests without a valid DISPLAY that allows X11 connections.
* The tests are run against a KDE3 or KDE4 desktop.
* Window manager uses "click to focus", and not "focus follows mouse". Many
tests move the mouse cursor around and expect this to not affect focus
and activation.
* Disable "click to activate", i.e., when a window is opened, the window
manager should automatically activate it (give it input focus) and not
wait for the user to click the window.