qt5base-lts/tests/benchmarks
Andrei Golubev 02a5928fa5 Add QList/QVector benchmark tests
Added some simple benchmarks for QList insertion of 1 element

Added same tests for QVector (within the same file) for 5.15

Task-number: QTBUG-87330
Task-number: QTBUG-86583
Pick-to: 5.15
Change-Id: I19a851c79cf5ce0329266883e99ecaf2d6b3df19
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
2020-11-04 11:21:01 +01:00
..
corelib Add QList/QVector benchmark tests 2020-11-04 11:21:01 +01:00
dbus Another round of replacing 0 with nullptr 2020-10-07 23:02:47 +02:00
gui CMake: Regenerate projects to use new qt_internal_ API 2020-09-23 16:59:06 +02:00
network Another round of replacing 0 with nullptr 2020-10-07 23:02:47 +02:00
plugins/imageformats/jpeg CMake: Regenerate projects to use new qt_internal_ API 2020-09-23 16:59:06 +02:00
sql CMake: Regenerate projects to use new qt_internal_ API 2020-09-23 16:59:06 +02:00
testlib CMake: Regenerate projects to use new qt_internal_ API 2020-09-23 16:59:06 +02:00
widgets Get rid of all usage of QApplication:desktop 2020-10-14 06:38:43 +02:00
benchmarks.pro Add testlib selftests for double and for non-finite float and double 2019-02-06 10:11:22 +00:00
CMakeLists.txt Convert remaining tests/benchmarks 2019-11-04 15:48:51 +00:00
README
trusted-benchmarks.pri

The most reliable way of running benchmarks is to do it in an otherwise idle
system. On a busy system, the results will vary according to the other tasks
demanding attention in the system.

We have managed to obtain quite reliable results by doing the following on
Linux (and you need root):

 - switching the scheduler to a Real-Time mode
 - setting the processor affinity to one single processor
 - disabling the other thread of the same core

This should work rather well for CPU-intensive tasks. A task that is in Real-
Time mode will simply not be preempted by the OS. But if you make OS syscalls,
especially I/O ones, your task will be de-scheduled. Note that this includes
page faults, so if you can, make sure your benchmark's warmup code paths touch
most of the data.

To do this you need a tool called schedtool (package schedtool), from
http://freequaos.host.sk/schedtool/

From this point on, we are using CPU0 for all tasks:

If you have a Hyperthreaded multi-core processor (Core-i5 and Core-i7), you
have to disable the other thread of the same core as CPU0. To discover which
one it is:

$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/thread_siblings_list

This will print something like 0,4, meaning that CPUs 0 and 4 are sibling
threads on the same core. So we'll turn CPU 4 off:

(as root)
# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/online

To turn it back on, echo 1 into the same file.

To run a task on CPU 0 exclusively, using FIFO RT priority 10, you run the
following:

(as root)
# schedtool -F -p 10 -a 1 -e ./taskname

For example:
# schedtool -F -p 10 -a 1 -e ./tst_bench_qstring -tickcounter

Warning: if your task livelocks or takes far too long to complete, your system
may be unusable for a long time, especially if you don't have other cores to
run stuff on. To prevent that, run it before schedtool and time it.

You can also limit the CPU time that the task is allowed to take. Run in the
same shell as you'll run schedtool:

$ ulimit -s 300
To limit to 300 seconds (5 minutes)

If your task runs away, it will get a SIGXCPU after consuming 5 minutes of CPU
time (5 minutes running at 100%).

If your app is multithreaded, you may want to give it more CPUs, like CPU0 and
CPU1 with -a 3  (it's a bitmask).

For best results, you should disable ALL other cores and threads of the same
processor. The new Core-i7 have one processor with 4 cores,
each core can run 2 threads; the older Mac Pros have two processors with 4
cores each. So on those Mac Pros, you'd disable cores 1, 2 and 3, while on the
Core-i7, you'll need to disable all other CPUs.

However, disabling just the sibling thread seems to produce very reliable
results for me already, with variance often below 0.5% (even though there are
some measurable spikes).

Other things to try:

Running the benchmark with highest priority, i.e. "sudo nice -19"
usually produces stable results on some machines. If the benchmark also
involves displaying something on the screen (on X11), running it with
"-sync" is a must. Though, in that case the "real" cost is not correct,
but it is useful to discover regressions.

Also; not many people know about ionice (1)
      ionice - get/set program io scheduling class and priority