8c6c4df3e8
If we had one test function that just did tst_Mouse::f1() { QTest::mouseMove(w, QPoint(0,0)); } and another test function that did tst_Mouse::f2() { QTest::mouseMove(w, QPoint(500,500)); } their corresponding event timestamps were only 1 apart from each other. This meant that any code that tried to estimate the velocity of a mouse cursor would get a really high velocity estimate inside f2(). This would come as a surprise to most people. So to avoid this, we add a 500 ms timestamp delay between each test function call. In theory this could also prevent generating a mouseDoubleClickEvent when a pair of test functions containing a press-release sequence was run, but there is a separate pre-existing mechanism to handle that case. Change-Id: Icd4fc35853c09f080466d22411208c7b5c4174b5 Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
auto | ||
baselineserver | ||
benchmarks | ||
global | ||
libfuzzer | ||
manual | ||
shared | ||
testserver | ||
README | ||
tests.pro |
This directory contains autotests and benchmarks based on Qt Test. In order to run the autotests reliably, you need to configure a desktop to match the test environment that these tests are written for. Linux X11: * The user must be logged in to an active desktop; you can't run the autotests without a valid DISPLAY that allows X11 connections. * The tests are run against a KDE3 or KDE4 desktop. * Window manager uses "click to focus", and not "focus follows mouse". Many tests move the mouse cursor around and expect this to not affect focus and activation. * Disable "click to activate", i.e., when a window is opened, the window manager should automatically activate it (give it input focus) and not wait for the user to click the window.