qt5base-lts/tests
Mårten Nordheim 64368bb527 Add a few more cases to the QString::number(double) test
Formatting using scientific notation with extra precision wasn't tested

Change-Id: I7a89a0f3d6468515604e43e52fc366dedf3c39ea
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
2021-07-30 12:00:37 +02:00
..
auto Add a few more cases to the QString::number(double) test 2021-07-30 12:00:37 +02:00
baselineserver Another round of replacing 0 with nullptr 2020-10-07 23:02:47 +02:00
benchmarks QString benchmark: don't use %ls 2021-07-29 10:42:36 +02:00
global
libfuzzer Fuzzing: Guide the compiler to the right ctor of QCalendar 2021-07-26 18:37:12 +02:00
manual QNetworkInformation: Give the manual test a GUI 2021-07-13 16:37:19 +02:00
shared Refactor createSymbolicLink() and createNtfsJunction() 2021-06-02 23:02:45 +02:00
testserver Network self-test: make it work with docker/containers 2020-11-17 19:56:06 +01:00
CMakeLists.txt CMake: Refactor optimization flag handling and add optimize_full 2020-10-06 10:07:05 +02:00
README

This directory contains autotests and benchmarks based on Qt Test. In order
to run the autotests reliably, you need to configure a desktop to match the
test environment that these tests are written for.

Linux X11:

   * The user must be logged in to an active desktop; you can't run the
     autotests without a valid DISPLAY that allows X11 connections.

   * The tests are run against a KDE3 or KDE4 desktop.

   * Window manager uses "click to focus", and not "focus follows mouse". Many
     tests move the mouse cursor around and expect this to not affect focus
     and activation.

   * Disable "click to activate", i.e., when a window is opened, the window
     manager should automatically activate it (give it input focus) and not
     wait for the user to click the window.