bf3e80023a
First and foremost, the STL-style iterators don't do this. Those don't provide a guarantee that the container won't get shared again while the iterator is active. Second, there's no protection against a second mutable iterator being created and resetting the sharable flag back to true. [ChangeLog][Important behavior changes] The mutable Java-style iterators like QListMutableIterator and QHashMutableIterator no longer set the parent container to unsharable mode. If you create a copy of the container being iterated on after the iterator, any changes done with the iterator might affect the copy too. Discussed-on: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-February/015724.html Change-Id: Iccfe411d5558c85ae459cff944215614c392388e Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@digia.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
.gitignore | ||
collections.pro | ||
tst_collections.cpp |