Tor Arne Vestbø c3bd5ffdc8 Don't wrap feature detection macros with QT_HAS_FOO() variants ... Using wrappers for these macros is problematic when for example passing the -frewrite-includes flag to preprocess sources before shipping off to distcc or Icecream. It will also start producing warnings when compilers implement http://eel.is/c++draft/cpp.cond#7.sentence-2. See for example https://reviews.llvm.org/D49091 Both https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html and the SD-6 document at https://isocpp.org/std/standing-documents/sd-6-sg10-feature-test-recommendations recommend defining '__has_foo(x) 0' as a fallback for compilers without the macros, so that's what we go for. Change-Id: I0298cd3b4a6ff6618821e34642a5ddd6728be767 Reviewed-by: Alex Richardson <arichardson.kde@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>		2019-12-10 00:48:07 +01:00
..
.gitignore	Moving relevant tests to corelib/global	2011-08-30 13:17:21 +02:00
qglobal.c	Don't wrap feature detection macros with QT_HAS_FOO() variants	2019-12-10 00:48:07 +01:00
qglobal.pro	Turn on C++11 and 14 correctly	2019-06-17 17:13:21 +02:00
tst_qglobal.cpp	Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/5.13' into dev	2019-06-27 14:38:03 +02:00