qt5base-lts/tests/auto/testlib/selftests/expected_pairdiagnostics.xml
Giuseppe D'Angelo 8e98a161e9 Long live std::pair!
Make QPair an alias for std::pair, and qMakePair just a forwarder
towards std::make_pair.

Why? Fundamentally to ditch a bunch of NIH code; gain for free
structured bindings, std::tuple and std::reference_wrapper
compatibility, and so on.

Breakages:

* Some that code manually forward declares QPair.
We don't care about it (<QContainerFwd> is the proper way).

* Some code that overloads on std::pair and QPair. Luckily
it's mostly centralized: debug, metatypes, testing macros.
Just remove the QPair overload.

* Usages of qMakePair forcing the template type parameters.
There are a handful of these in qtbase, but only one was actually
broken.

* std::pair is NOT (and will never likely be) trivially copiable.
This is agreed to be a mistake done by practically all implementations
in C++11, can can't be fixed without breaking ABI.
Some code using QPair assuming it's trivially copiable may break;
exactly one occurrence was in qtbase.

* QMetaType logic extracts the type names in two different ways,
one by looking at the source code string (e.g. extracted by moc)
and one via some ad-hoc reflection in C++. We need to make
"QPair" (as spelled in the source code) be the same as "std::pair"
(gathered via reflection, which will see through the alias)
when compared. The way it's already done e.g. for QList is
by actually replacing the moc-extracted name with the name
of the actual type used in C++; do the same here.
On libc++, std::pair is actually in an inline namespace --
i.e. std::__1::pair; the reflection will extract and store
"std::__1::pair" so we need an ad-hoc fix to QMetaType.

[ChangeLog][QtCore][QPair] QPair is now an alias to std::pair,
and does not exist as a class in Qt any more. This may break
code such as functions overloaded for both QPair and std::pair.
Usually, the overload taking a QPair can be safely discarded,
leaving only the one taking a std::pair. QPair API has not changed,
and qMakePair is still available for compatibility (although
new code is encouraged to use std::pair and std::make_pair
directly instead).

Change-Id: I7725c751bf23946cde577b1406e86a336c0a3dcf
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
2020-06-10 16:49:08 +02:00

34 lines
1.2 KiB
XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TestCase name="tst_PairDiagnostics">
<Environment>
<QtVersion>@INSERT_QT_VERSION_HERE@</QtVersion>
<QtBuild/>
<QTestVersion>@INSERT_QT_VERSION_HERE@</QTestVersion>
</Environment>
<TestFunction name="initTestCase">
<Incident type="pass" file="" line="0" />
<Duration msecs="0"/>
</TestFunction>
<TestFunction name="testQPair">
<Incident type="fail" file="qtbase/tests/auto/testlib/selftests/pairdiagnostics/tst_pairdiagnostics.cpp" line="0">
<Description><![CDATA[Compared values are not the same
Actual (pair1): "std::pair(1,1)"
Expected (pair2): "std::pair(1,2)"]]></Description>
</Incident>
<Duration msecs="0"/>
</TestFunction>
<TestFunction name="testStdPair">
<Incident type="fail" file="qtbase/tests/auto/testlib/selftests/pairdiagnostics/tst_pairdiagnostics.cpp" line="0">
<Description><![CDATA[Compared values are not the same
Actual (pair1): "std::pair(1,1)"
Expected (pair2): "std::pair(1,2)"]]></Description>
</Incident>
<Duration msecs="0"/>
</TestFunction>
<TestFunction name="cleanupTestCase">
<Incident type="pass" file="" line="0" />
<Duration msecs="0"/>
</TestFunction>
<Duration msecs="0"/>
</TestCase>