scuffed-code/icu4c/source/data/locales/en_GB.txt
2003-06-22 12:27:41 +00:00

101 lines
3.8 KiB
Plaintext

// ***************************************************************************
// *
// * Copyright (C) 1997-2003, International Business Machines
// * Corporation and others. All Rights Reserved.
// *
// ***************************************************************************
en_GB {
Version { "2.0" }
DateTimeElements:intvector {
2,
1,
}
DateTimePatterns {
"HH:mm:ss z",
"HH:mm:ss z",
"HH:mm:ss",
"HH:mm",
"EEEE, d MMMM yyyy",
"d MMMM yyyy",
"d MMM yyyy",
"dd/MM/yyyy",
"{1} {0}",
}
zoneStrings {
{
"Europe/London",
"Greenwich Mean Time",
"GMT",
"British Summer Time",
"BST",
}
}
//------------------------------------------------------------
// Rule Based Number Format Support
//------------------------------------------------------------
// * Spellout rules for U.K. English. U.K. English has one significant
// * difference from U.S. English: the names for values of 1,000,000,000
// * and higher. In American English, each successive "-illion" is 1,000
// * times greater than the preceding one: 1,000,000,000 is "one billion"
// * and 1,000,000,000,000 is "one trillion." In British English, each
// * successive "-illion" is one million times greater than the one before:
// * "one billion" is 1,000,000,000,000 (or what Americans would call a
// * "trillion"), and "one trillion" is 1,000,000,000,000,000,000.
// * 1,000,000,000 in British English is "one thousand million." (This
// * value is sometimes called a "milliard," but this word seems to have
// * fallen into disuse.)
// Could someone please correct me if I'm wrong about "milliard" falling
// into disuse, or have missed any other details of how large numbers
// are rendered. Also, could someone please provide me with information
// on which other English-speaking countries use which system? Right now,
// I'm assuming that the U.S. system is used in Canada and that all the
// other English-speaking countries follow the British system. Can
// someone out there confirm this?
SpelloutRules {
"%simplified:\n"
" -x: minus >>;\n"
" x.x: << point >>;\n"
" zero; one; two; three; four; five; six; seven; eight; nine;\n"
" ten; eleven; twelve; thirteen; fourteen; fifteen; sixteen;\n"
" seventeen; eighteen; nineteen;\n"
" 20: twenty[->>];\n"
" 30: thirty[->>];\n"
" 40: forty[->>];\n"
" 50: fifty[->>];\n"
" 60: sixty[->>];\n"
" 70: seventy[->>];\n"
" 80: eighty[->>];\n"
" 90: ninety[->>];\n"
" 100: << hundred[ >>];\n"
" 1000: << thousand[ >>];\n"
" 1,000,000: << million[ >>];\n"
" 1,000,000,000,000: << billion[ >>];\n"
" 1,000,000,000,000,000: =#,##0=;\n"
"%default:\n"
" -x: minus >>;\n"
" x.x: << point >>;\n"
" =%simplified=;\n"
" 100: << hundred[ >%%and>];\n"
" 1000: << thousand[ >%%and>];\n"
" 100,000>>: << thousand[>%%commas>];\n"
" 1,000,000: << million[>%%commas>];\n"
" 1,000,000,000,000: << billion[>%%commas>];\n"
" 1,000,000,000,000,000: =#,##0=;\n"
"%%and:\n"
" and =%default=;\n"
" 100: =%default=;\n"
"%%commas:\n"
" ' and =%default=;\n"
" 100: , =%default=;\n"
" 1000: , <%default< thousand, >%default>;\n"
" 1,000,000: , =%default=;"
"%%lenient-parse:\n"
" & ' ' , ',' ;\n"
}
}