2015-01-21 20:05:47 +00:00
|
|
|
How to submit a patch
|
|
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Making changes
|
|
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First create a branch for your changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
$ git checkout --track origin/master -b my_feature master
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After making your changes, create a commit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
$ git add [file1] [file2] ...
|
|
|
|
$ git commit
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If your branch gets out of date, you will need to update it:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
$ git pull --rebase
|
|
|
|
$ gclient sync
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adding a unit test
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are willing to change Skia codebase, it's nice to add a test at the same
|
|
|
|
time. Skia has a simple unittest framework so you can add a case to it.
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-30 15:00:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Test code is located under the 'tests' directory.
|
2015-01-21 20:05:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-30 15:00:42 +00:00
|
|
|
See [Writing Unit and Rendering Tests](tests) for details.
|
2015-01-21 20:05:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit tests are best, but if your change touches rendering and you can't think of
|
|
|
|
an automated way to verify the results, consider writing a GM test or a new page
|
|
|
|
of SampleApp. Also, if your change is the GPU code, you may not be able to write
|
|
|
|
it as part of the standard unit test suite, but there are GPU-specific testing
|
|
|
|
paths you can extend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submitting a patch
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For your code to be accepted into the codebase, you must complete the
|
|
|
|
[Individual Contributor License
|
|
|
|
Agreement](http://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html). You can do
|
|
|
|
this online, and it only takes a minute. If you are contributing on behalf of a
|
|
|
|
corporation, you must fill out the [Corporate Contributor License Agreement](http://code.google.com/legal/corporate-cla-v1.0.html)
|
|
|
|
and send it to us as described on that page. Add your (or your organization's)
|
|
|
|
name and contact info to the AUTHORS file as a part of your CL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that you've made a change and written a test for it, it's ready for the code
|
|
|
|
review! Submit a patch and getting it reviewed is fairly easy with depot tools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use git-cl, which comes with [depot tools](http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/how-tos/install-depot-tools).
|
|
|
|
For help, run git-cl help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Configuring git-cl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before using any git-cl commands you will need to configure it to point at the
|
|
|
|
correct code review server. This is accomplished with the following command:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
git cl config https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/master/codereview.settings
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Find a reviewer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ideally, the reviewer is someone who is familiar with the area of code you are
|
|
|
|
touching. If you have doubts, look at the git blame for the file to see who else
|
|
|
|
has been editing it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Uploading changes for review
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skia uses Chromium's code review [site](http://codereview.chromium.org) and the
|
|
|
|
Rietveld open source code review tool.
|
|
|
|
Use git cl to upload your change:
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
$ git cl upload
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may have to enter a Google Account username and password to authenticate
|
|
|
|
yourself to codereview.chromium.org. A free gmail account will do fine, or any
|
|
|
|
other type of Google account. It does not have to match the email address you
|
|
|
|
configured using git config --global user.email above, but it can.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The command output should include a URL, similar to
|
|
|
|
(https://codereview.chromium.org/111893004/), indicating where your changelist
|
|
|
|
can be reviewed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Request review
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Go to the supplied URL or go to the code review page and click **Issues created
|
|
|
|
by me**. Select the change you want to submit for review and click **Edit
|
|
|
|
Issue**. Enter at least one reviewer's email address and click **Update Issue**.
|
|
|
|
Now click on **Publish+Mail Comments**, add any optional notes, and send your
|
|
|
|
change off for review. Unless you publish your change, no one will know to look
|
|
|
|
at it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_Note_: If you don't see editing commands on the review page, click **Log In**
|
|
|
|
in the upper right. _Hint_: You can add -r reviewer@example.com --send-mail to
|
|
|
|
send the email directly when uploading a change in both gcl and git-cl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The review process
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you submit a giant patch, or do a bunch of work without discussing it with
|
|
|
|
the relevant people, you may have a hard time convincing anyone to review it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please follow the guidelines on how to conduct a code review detailed here:
|
|
|
|
https://code.google.com/p/rietveld/wiki/CodeReviewHelp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Code reviews are an important part of the engineering process. The reviewer will
|
|
|
|
almost always have suggestions or style fixes for you, and it's important not to
|
|
|
|
take such suggestions personally or as a commentary on your abilities or ideas.
|
|
|
|
This is a process where we work together to make sure that the highest quality
|
|
|
|
code gets submitted!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You will likely get email back from the reviewer with comments. Fix these and
|
|
|
|
update the patch set in the issue by uploading again. The upload will explain
|
|
|
|
that it is updating the current CL and ask you for a message explaining the
|
|
|
|
change. Be sure to respond to all comments before you request review of an
|
|
|
|
update.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you need to update code the code on an already uploaded CL, simply edit the
|
|
|
|
code, commit it again locally, and then run git cl upload again e.g.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
echo "" > GOATS
|
|
|
|
git add GOATS
|
|
|
|
git commit -m 'add newline fix to GOATS'
|
|
|
|
git cl upload
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once you're ready for another review, use **Publish+Mail Comments** again to
|
|
|
|
send another notification (it is helpful to tell the review what you did with
|
|
|
|
respect to each of their comments). When the reviewer is happy with your patch,
|
|
|
|
they will say "LGTM" ("Looks Good To Me").
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_Note_: As you work through the review process, both you and your reviewers
|
|
|
|
should converse using the code review interface, and send notes using
|
|
|
|
**Publish+Mail Comments**.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once your commit has gone in, you should delete the branch containing your change:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
$ git checkout master
|
|
|
|
$ git branch -D my_feature
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final Testing
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skia's principal downstream user is Chromium, and any change to Skia rendering
|
|
|
|
output can break Chromium. If your change alters rendering in any way, you are
|
|
|
|
expected to test for and alleviate this. (You may be able to find a Skia team
|
|
|
|
member to help you, but the onus remains on each individual contributor to avoid
|
|
|
|
breaking Chrome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Evaluating Impact on Chromium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep in mind that Skia is rolled daily into Blink and Chromium. Run local tests
|
|
|
|
and watch canary bots for results to ensure no impact. If you are submitting
|
|
|
|
changes that will impact layout tests, follow the guides below and/or work with
|
|
|
|
your friendly Skia-Blink engineer to evaluate, rebaseline, and land your
|
|
|
|
changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[How to land Skia changes that change Blink layout test results](../chrome/layouttest)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you're changing the Skia API, you may need to make an associated change in Chromium.
|
|
|
|
If you do, please follow these instructions: [Landing Skia changes which require Chrome changes](../chrome/changes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check in your changes
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Non-Skia-committers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you already have committer rights, you can follow the directions below to
|
|
|
|
commit your change directly to Skia's repository.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you don't have committer rights in https://skia.googlesource.com/skia.git ...
|
|
|
|
first of all, thanks for submitting your patch! We really appreciate these
|
|
|
|
submissions. Unfortunately, we don't yet have a way for Skia committers to mark
|
|
|
|
a patch as "approved" and thus allow non-committers to commit them. So instead,
|
|
|
|
please ask a Skia committer to land your patch for you or land using the commit
|
|
|
|
queue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of this process, the Skia committer may create a new codereview
|
|
|
|
containing your patch (perhaps with some small adjustments at her discretion).
|
|
|
|
If so, you can mark your codereview as "Closed", and update it with a link to
|
|
|
|
the new codereview.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Skia committers:
|
|
|
|
* tips on how to apply the externally provided patch are [here](./patch)
|
|
|
|
* when landing externally contributed patches, please note the original
|
|
|
|
contributor's identity (and provide a link to the original codereview) in the commit message
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git-cl will squash all your commits into a single one with the description you used when you uploaded your change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
git cl land
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|
|
|
|
git cl land -c 'Contributor Name <email@example.com>'
|
|
|
|
~~~~
|