Test performance of 565 bitmap scaling
This would catch b/70172912 On Linux desktops, see the difference between 8888 and 565 using: nanobench --config 8888 -m ^bitmap_RGB_565_scale$ ^bitmap_BGRA_8888_scale$ ^bitmap_RGB_565_scale_bilerp$ ^bitmap_BGRA_8888_scale_bilerp$ On Android, use: nanobench --config 8888 -m ^bitmap_RGB_565_scale$ ^bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale$ ^bitmap_RGB_565_scale_bilerp$ ^bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp$ The results are similar if nanobench is run with --config 565. So it seems that the destination color type isn't very critical. Bug: skia: Change-Id: I71defda4d9e089a9a973cdb0c161773bc16e4a24 Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/81141 Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com> Commit-Queue: Yuqian Li <liyuqian@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ec34a71bea
commit
24e963d429
@ -313,6 +313,10 @@ DEF_BENCH( return new FilterBitmapBench(kN32_SkColorType, kOpaque_SkAlphaType, f
|
||||
DEF_BENCH( return new FilterBitmapBench(kN32_SkColorType, kOpaque_SkAlphaType, true, true, kScale_Flag | kBilerp_Flag); )
|
||||
DEF_BENCH( return new FilterBitmapBench(kN32_SkColorType, kOpaque_SkAlphaType, true, false, kScale_Flag | kBilerp_Flag); )
|
||||
|
||||
// The following two cases test the performance regression of b/70172912 .
|
||||
DEF_BENCH( return new FilterBitmapBench(kRGB_565_SkColorType, kOpaque_SkAlphaType, false, false, kScale_Flag | kBilerp_Flag); )
|
||||
DEF_BENCH( return new BitmapBench(kRGB_565_SkColorType, kOpaque_SkAlphaType, false, false, true); )
|
||||
|
||||
// scale rotate filter -> S32_opaque_D32_filter_DXDY_{SSE2,SSSE3}
|
||||
DEF_BENCH( return new FilterBitmapBench(kN32_SkColorType, kPremul_SkAlphaType, false, false, kScale_Flag | kRotate_Flag | kBilerp_Flag); )
|
||||
DEF_BENCH( return new FilterBitmapBench(kN32_SkColorType, kOpaque_SkAlphaType, false, false, kScale_Flag | kRotate_Flag | kBilerp_Flag); )
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user