Avoid undefined behavior and enable asserts in ClampTest.

The old code here wasn't being careful to avoid int32_t overflow in slow_check.  Fix that.

R_ASSERT hasn't been doing anything for a while.  As a result, there are a couple bugs in SkClampRange, marked as such and commented out.  The asserts also weren't quite passing, so I fixed them up (allowing 0xFFFF to be considered either as part of the ramp or part of V1.)

BUG=skia:2481
R=reed@google.com, mtklein@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/260523004

git-svn-id: http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@14479 2bbb7eff-a529-9590-31e7-b0007b416f81
This commit is contained in:
commit-bot@chromium.org 2014-04-30 16:51:51 +00:00
parent 2a8abc4552
commit 86398e5d91

View File

@ -10,71 +10,54 @@
#include "gradients/SkClampRange.h"
static skiatest::Reporter* gReporter;
static void debug_me() {
if (NULL == gReporter) {
SkDebugf("dsfdssd\n");
}
#define R_ASSERT(cond) if (!(cond)) { \
SkDebugf("%d: %s\n", __LINE__, #cond); \
REPORTER_ASSERT(gReporter, cond); \
}
#ifdef USE_REPORTER
// Arbitrary sentinel values outside [0, 0xFFFF].
static const int kV0 = -42, kV1 = -53, kRamp = -64;
#define R_ASSERT(cond) \
do { if (!(cond)) { \
debug_me(); \
REPORTER_ASSERT(gReporter, cond); \
}} while (0)
#else
#define R_ASSERT(cond) \
do { if (!(cond)) { \
debug_me(); \
}} while (0)
#endif
static int classify_value(SkFixed fx, int v0, int v1) {
if (fx <= 0) {
return v0;
static void check_value(int64_t bigfx, int expected) {
if (bigfx < 0) {
R_ASSERT(expected == kV0);
} else if (bigfx > 0xFFFF) {
R_ASSERT(expected == kV1);
} else if (bigfx == 0xFFFF) {
// Either one is fine (and we do see both).
R_ASSERT(expected == kV1 || expected == kRamp);
} else {
R_ASSERT(expected == kRamp);
}
if (fx >= 0xFFFF) {
return v1;
}
R_ASSERT(false);
return 0;
}
#define V0 -42
#define V1 1024
static void slow_check(const SkClampRange& range,
SkFixed fx, SkFixed dx, int count) {
const SkFixed fx, SkFixed dx, int count) {
SkASSERT(range.fCount0 + range.fCount1 + range.fCount2 == count);
// If dx is large, fx will overflow if updated naively. So we use more bits.
int64_t bigfx = fx;
for (int i = 0; i < range.fCount0; i++) {
int v = classify_value(fx, V0, V1);
R_ASSERT(v == range.fV0);
fx += dx;
}
if (range.fCount1 > 0 && fx != range.fFx1) {
// SkDebugf("%x %x\n", fx, range.fFx1);
R_ASSERT(false); // bad fFx1
return;
check_value(bigfx, range.fV0);
bigfx += dx;
}
for (int i = 0; i < range.fCount1; i++) {
R_ASSERT(fx >= 0 && fx <= 0xFFFF);
fx += dx;
check_value(bigfx, kRamp);
bigfx += dx;
}
for (int i = 0; i < range.fCount2; i++) {
int v = classify_value(fx, V0, V1);
R_ASSERT(v == range.fV1);
fx += dx;
check_value(bigfx, range.fV1);
bigfx += dx;
}
}
static void test_range(SkFixed fx, SkFixed dx, int count) {
SkClampRange range;
range.init(fx, dx, count, V0, V1);
range.init(fx, dx, count, kV0, kV1);
slow_check(range, fx, dx, count);
}
@ -96,7 +79,8 @@ DEF_TEST(ClampRange, reporter) {
test_range(ff(1), ff(16384), 100);
test_range(ff(-1), ff(-16384), 100);
test_range(ff(1)/2, ff(16384), 100);
test_range(ff(1)/2, ff(-16384), 100);
// TODO(reed): skia:2481, fix whatever bug this is, then uncomment
//test_range(ff(1)/2, ff(-16384), 100);
SkRandom rand;
@ -109,6 +93,8 @@ DEF_TEST(ClampRange, reporter) {
test_range(fx, dx, count);
}
// TODO(reed): skia:2481, fix whatever bug this is, then uncomment
/*
// test overflow cases
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
SkFixed fx = rand.nextS();
@ -116,4 +102,5 @@ DEF_TEST(ClampRange, reporter) {
int count = rand.nextU() % 1000 + 1;
test_range(fx, dx, count);
}
*/
}