* /user/download: remove instruction to compile and run skia
tests - moved to /user/quick/${OS}
* /user/quick/desktop: move Gyp options to a section in the
FAQ (distracts from quick start narritive).
* /user/tips: reformat, rewrite.
NOTRY=true
DOCS_PREVIEW= https://skia.org/?cl=1443653002
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1443653002
- /user/quick/desktop to bring together all common information for
using Skia on desktop OSes. Remove duplication.
- Replace all instances of call ing gyp_skia directly with calling
`python bin/sync-and-gyp`. This is more correct on Windows
- Remove outdated linux prerequisite packages
- Formatting, formatting, formatting.
- Note command-line syntax differences in Windows
- SampleApp.app is no longer a bundle on MacOS
NOTRY=true
DOCS_PREVIEW= https://skia.org/?cl=1439493003
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1439493003
It turns out that gyp (kind of) has support for cross
compiling with a different host and target. We simply
need to specify CC_host and CC_target instead of CC.
Making this change allows us to compile yasm on a Linux
host for Android.
We run into problems on Mac because
the linker on a Mac host requires different command line
arguments than the linker on the Android target. In
looking through the code for gyp itself and speaking to
Ben, it doesn't appear to me that gyp supports passing
different arguments to host and target linkers.
I would imagine that we would have similar problems on
Windows.
Below is a link to a CL that would fix this issue in gyp.
It looks like it has been dropped for a long time.
Thanks to Ben for this link!
https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10795044/
Also I'm adding a link to the build instructions for Chrome
(thanks again Ben). It looks like they only support
building for Android from Linux.
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/AndroidBuildInstructions
My next steps are:
1) Getting in touch with Torne or someone else with gyp to
see if people are aware of this issue or interested in
fixing it.
2) Deciding if skia should care about this issue.
3) Deciding if skia should work around this issue.
It'd be really great to hear your thoughts on (2) and (3).
My first thought is that we shouldn't care because, as
long as we always compile the production copy of skia for
Android on Linux, we will get the fast code. Is this
a valid conclusion? Is there a way to write Android apps
on Mac that accidentally use the slower code?
If we do care, there are workarounds:
For Mac, we can check in a yasm binary - it's a little
smaller than the one I am deleting in this CL :-/
For Windows, we *might* be able to use the yasm.exe binary
already in externals (we get this from DEPS because this is
how chromium uses yasm on Windows).
Are there other platforms that we care about?
Let me know what you think!
BUG=skia:4028
DOCS_PREVIEW= https://skia.org/?cl=1239333002
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1239333002
Rename a few files to make their function clearer.
Update other files to remove dead code or improve function.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/865943007
Without specifying the resource path a number of tests and gms do not
work properly. The example given in the docs should specify the
resource path so that the example run is exemplary.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/898453003
This fixes every case where virtual and SK_OVERRIDE were on the same line,
which should be the bulk of cases. We'll have to manually clean up the rest
over time unless I level up in regexes.
for f in (find . -type f); perl -p -i -e 's/virtual (.*)SK_OVERRIDE/\1SK_OVERRIDE/g' $f; end
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/806653007
