This will hopefully improve performance on lower-end GPUs.
Change-Id: I9c2ee6dc31acd08bec0bfb5f59edc3cf90163f9e
Bug: skia:12339
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/465078
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Previously, a struct containing a vardecl with multiple declarations
would interpret arrays incorrectly. An array would be applied to ALL
variables in the decl after its initial appearance. That is,
`int w, x[10], y, z;` would be interpreted as
`int w, x[10], y[10], z[10];`.
This is now fixed and our test case runs as expected.
Change-Id: I5b4a617c58cdfb83face651effd42770a1f68638
Bug: oss-fuzz:37622
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/441879
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
The fuzzer detected a serious parsing error; a struct containing a
vardecl with multiple declarations would interpret arrays incorrectly.
An array would be applied to ALL variables in the decl after its initial
appearance. That is, `int w, x[10], y, z;` would be interpreted as
`int w, x[10], y[10], z[10];`. The fuzzer caught this by putting two
arrayed variables in a row; the second variable was interpreted as a
nested array, which led to an assertion.
This CL contains a simple hand-written test case demonstrating the bug,
with the fix coming in a followup.
Change-Id: I42d7372ba77fa1528ae24eb8c29a2e5903784139
Bug: oss-fuzz:37622
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/441878
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
