This put the coverage for do-while loops on par with for loops.
Change-Id: I53e0d733edd02a6a139792a8d74c68116453e5ff
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/385500
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
A global variable should be considered "dead" if it's never written and
never read. The previous code checked if it was never written OR never
read, which is not the same.
This would generate GLSL/Metal that didn't compile. In SPIR-V, it would
SkASSERT, then crash, during codegen. The fuzzer was able to detect the
SPIR-V issue, but it was wrong in all three cases.
Change-Id: Id59a2499eb5baa3839b93826bfbc24191bfd490b
Bug: oss-fuzz:32005
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/385280
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
'in' variables without locations aren't allowed. Use uniforms instead.
Bug: skia:11738
Change-Id: Ic066106deb7409cff154b4be7cfb3e03a7025c7d
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/385000
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Prevents us from accepting code that can't be correctly transformed to
GLSL, like:
uniform float x;
float y = x;
(Previously, writing code like that in a runtime effect would
effectively produce the exact same code all the way through to GLSL, and
the driver would fail to compile it).
Bug: skia:11336
Change-Id: Iaa797587c4a4a7289ed59ce2736cf0bf0fc5bca3
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384698
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
The referenced bug is closed, and the compiler does correctly emit an
error here.
Change-Id: I824f7819a1e077163f528ac503f3743aab5e58a1
Bug: skia:11322
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384697
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This reverts commit a04692f69e.
Reason for revert: Angry Vulkan bots.
Original change's description:
> Fixed a number of spots where we should have been using RelaxedPrecision
>
> Our SPIR-V output was missing many RelaxedPrecision decorations, which
> was presumably impacting performance.
>
> Change-Id: Iee32d4a42f37af167fe0e45f3db94c2142129695
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384178
> Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
TBR=egdaniel@google.com,brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com
Change-Id: If4fe945cb363c9b61b5a4abfde649a437689d2eb
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384217
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Our SPIR-V output was missing many RelaxedPrecision decorations, which
was presumably impacting performance.
Change-Id: Iee32d4a42f37af167fe0e45f3db94c2142129695
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384178
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
We no longer derive a performance benefit from this pass in practice,
and it is a very expensive compilation step. It is also prone to fuzz-
related errors.
Doc: http://go/optimization-in-sksl
Change-Id: Ief08ffac659a8fe7fe92c92b9a5da14c9f713bc2
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/381261
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
As you might expect, a function tagged with `noinline` will never be
considered as a candidate for inlining.
Change-Id: Ia098f8974e6de251d78bb2a76cd71db8a86bc19c
Bug: skia:11362
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/382337
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Currently, only one of three uses (local variables) does this correctly.
Bug: skia:11716
Change-Id: Iad11e8e5998fcc7caee4d438e0558c5d4e2b1821
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/382277
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Change-Id: I7a7874e58bf53978afce8a41b26092406b6490ed
Bug: skia:11342
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/380360
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
- Values from constant variables are folded in when it helps, e.g.:
const bool SHINY = true;
const float SHININESS = 2;
if (!SHINY) { // <-- optimizes directly to `false`
param = -SHININESS; // <-- optimizes to `-2`
- Doubled-up logical-not and negation are stripped:
y = -(-x); // <-- optimizes to `y = x;`
b = !!a; // <-- optimizes to `b = a;`
Removal of doubled-up negation and logical-not was actually never
implemented in the constant-propagation phase; I just noticed it while
I was here and thinking about it.
Change-Id: Ie28bb9b5af91376f03d926e26e37f4a131bbf550
Bug: skia:11343
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/379298
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
This enables the ternary to be optimized away in code like:
const bool SHINY = true;
color = SHINY ? add_shine(x) : x; // to --> `color = add_shine(x);`
Without constant propagation.
Also, I added a unit test for ternary expression simplification; I
wasn't able to find an existing one.
When the optimization flag is disabled, this CL actually removes the
optimization of `true ? x : y` --> `x` entirely; previously, this
substitution would be made regardless of optimization settings.
Change-Id: I93a8b9d4027902d35f8a19cfd6417170b209d056
Bug: skia:11343
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/379297
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This check now runs at function finalization time, before constant
propagation has occurred; this affected the "DeadIfStatement" test.
Our detection isn't smart enough to realize that a loop will run zero
times, so it treats `for` and `while` loops as always running at least
once. This isn't strictly correct, but it actually mirrors how the CFG
implementation works anyway. The only downside is that we would not flag
code like `for (i=0; i<0; ++i) { return x; }` as an error.
Change-Id: I5e43a6ee3a3993045559f0fb0646d36112543a94
Bug: skia:11377
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/379056
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
This should be legal, and we support this, but some versions of Android
do not: http://screen/3bkQewHF3xUMn5v There's no point in allowing
these shaders to exist; they can't compile on real-world clients, and
these vardecls are borderline meaningless (as the variables being
declared aren't reachable by any other statements).
Change-Id: Ie1351933c90caee9124eeab8983364ec030b2653
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/379584
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This reverts commit e4da7b672f.
Reason for revert: breaks SkSLBench perf test
Original change's description:
> Migrate if-statement simplifyStatement logic to IfStatement::Make.
>
> This performs essentially the same simplifications as before, just at
> a different phase of compilation.
>
> Change-Id: Ia88df6857d4089962505cd1281798fda74fd0b02
> Bug: skia:11343, skia:11319
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/376177
> Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
TBR=brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com
Change-Id: I0051188ffe69426904066eb60a932435efdc2af8
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: skia:11343
Bug: skia:11319
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/379062
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This performs essentially the same simplifications as before, just at
a different phase of compilation.
Change-Id: Ia88df6857d4089962505cd1281798fda74fd0b02
Bug: skia:11343, skia:11319
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/376177
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Rather than have the inliner own this responsibility, the function
finalizer now detects if a function is supposed to return a value but
never actually does. This will allow us to detect this error case even
if the inliner is disabled. The inliner should no longer encounter
functions that claim to return a value but don't, so it will now assert
if one is encountered. (The inliner still has the logic to handle this
case gracefully, just in case.)
The check is currently very simple and doesn't analyze the structure of
the function, so it won't report cases where some paths return a value
and others don't, e.g. this will pass the test:
int func() { if (something()) return 123; }
(This is good enough to resolve the inliner issue, though, as it only
occurred in functions with no value-returns at all.)
Change-Id: I21f13daffe66c8f2e72932b320ee268ba9207bfa
Bug: oss-fuzz:31469, oss-fuzz:31525, skia:11377
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/377196
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Bug: skia:11356
Change-Id: I16322e6396dc7e7c8c50ba1d39e07311cf3bd346
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/376116
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
In http://review.skia.org/375776, an optimization was added to the
Inliner, causing it to skip generation of unnecessary temporary
variables. The fuzzer immediately discovered a flaw in this logic: the
"unnecessary" variable was actually used in the rare case that a
function failed to actually return a value. The inliner didn't detect
this case. Of course, this isn't a valid program either, so now we
report the error and cleanly fail.
Change-Id: I1f201cfd33f45cace3be93765a4e214e43a46e69
Bug: oss-fuzz:31469, oss-fuzz:31525
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/377101
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
For now, just use this to prevent *any* layout qualifiers from appearing
on functions, or their parameters.
Bug: skia:11301
Change-Id: I05d8118c7121048c6ef49695a54e3714a8f8687e
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/376796
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This adds Analysis::IsConstantExpression, to determine if an expression
is a constant-expression. It now expands to cover 'const' local and
global variables, because we also enforce that the initializer on those
variables is - in turn - a constant expression.
This fixes 10837 - previously you could initialize a const variable with
a non-constant expression, and we'd emit GLSL that contained that same
pattern, which would fail to compile at the driver level. That should
not be possible any longer.
Bug: skia:10679
Bug: skia:10837
Change-Id: I517820ef4da57fff45768c0b04c55aebc18d3272
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/375856
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
The expression `~123` was making a PrefixExpression of type $intLiteral.
It should be converted to type `int` when the ~ prefix is applied.
This change also changes the output from oss-fuzz:27614. Both programs
are essentially nonsense expressions with no real behavior, so this is
fine.
Change-Id: I586be149ce95136fabee72fdd3473814d54948cf
Bug: oss-fuzz:31410
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/376620
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Change-Id: Iafeb13812851271a5262730e9c0642d4469c273f
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/375020
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Now, even if a qualifier has a default value, we will know that it
appeared in the text. We can use that to check for redundant qualifiers
(as is being done here), and in the IR generator to prevent any use of
certain qualifiers, depending on context. (eg, runtime effects, wrong
shader stage, on a parameter declaration, etc.)
Bug: skia:11301
Change-Id: I2cd6ad35c2b4c4d6f87ade97e80aea84dc16ee4b
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/374616
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
At IR generation time, this CL limits our optimizations to only
@switch statements. A regular switch statement will only be optimized
during the optimization phase even if the switch-value is a known
compile-time constant. This is done to avoid upsetting our reachability
analysis.
Most of this CL is moving existing logic from SkSLCompiler into
SkSLAnalysis and SkSLSwitchStatement. Although the diffs look large, the
actual changes are very small.
Change-Id: I90920f41bc386dfa7a980ae7510f6681231a5120
Bug: skia:11340, skia:11342, skia:11319
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372679
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Bug: skia:10837
Change-Id: I33da2eb1e723ed04ab62d65c21e54306dd362bed
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372677
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
These were unused - we always enable the advanced blend equation
extension using "blend_support_all_equations" (if enabling the
extension is required at all).
Change-Id: I95fd6483ec54dfaf983290de95629fe0e86c22e8
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/373877
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Dalton <csmartdalton@google.com>
Constant propagation might be going away, but static-switches are likely
here to stay. Avoid conflating the two in this test.
Change-Id: If4b6c99c85f124d3bbc20da858693f09f5e4fd59
Bug: skia:11319
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/374117
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
The optimizer now properly recognizes all types of exits from a switch
statement. Break, continue and return are all potential exits and need
to be considered when determining the exit path from the switch.
Previously, dead code elimination was hiding the effects of this bug
from us, but it meant that an optimized switch had the potential to
generate lots of worthless IR nodes which then needed to be detected and
eliminated by the CFG. In particular, this affected the enum form of
blend, causing a catastrophic amount of extra work to be done.
Change-Id: If857e38cadfc016884624ea4db25a273ad3dce5b
Bug: skia:11352
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372958
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Change-Id: I672345116e3b5538c0f7e8c5f2f74aa56bb81e6d
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372676
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
When we detect a static switch, the optimizer finds the matching switch-
case and eliminates all the other switch-cases. It handles case
fall-through by scanning forward and looking for an unconditional break.
However, the inliner has an interesting quirk--it can replace `return`
statements inside of a switch with `continue` statements, since the body
of the inlined function has been wrapped with a for-loop to allow for
early exits. The optimizer does not recognize these continue statements
as exits from the switch (although they certainly qualify), so it
treats continues as fallen-through and keeps emitting switch-cases.
The dead-code elimination pass was actually doing us a favor here and
eliminating the excess code later. A flag was added to disable DCE in
order to reveal the problem in a test.
Change-Id: I8ff19fde5e32d0ab73d7c5411da40cb953a446f5
Bug: skia:11352
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372956
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Surprisingly, this error is actually caught by our parser, which
interprets the default label in a unique way. From the parser comments:
"Requiring default: to be last (in defiance of C and GLSL) was a
deliberate decision. Other parts of the compiler may rely upon this
assumption."
The comment is true--we don't check for duplicate default switch-case
labels anywhere else in the code, just here in the parser.
We rely on this, so we should have a test for it.
Change-Id: I6df5c565aca4d4b8565b96638dce9504efc39ccc
Bug: skia:11340
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372617
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Change-Id: I4df18946cdb3d9f1f7833461f913f2df94696821
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372197
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
These were all unused, and only implemented on one backend.
Change-Id: Ibd2fcef1a971e6c1bd9da0784c5d852a60708484
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372117
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Change-Id: I885149c73be63c223ac88a697ffe046a7f8384d0
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372116
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Bug: skia:11335
Change-Id: I88c952cbfe2d2c5920e17675da1674928f37b982
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/371480
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
When coercing a type, we would previously call checkValid() so we could
detect function-references and type-references, so we could get a nicer
error message.
It turns out that we can just do the "is this a type-reference/
function-reference?" check directly inside coerce() and get the same
improved error messages. Since we should be coercing all our values to
the right type, and type/function-references aren't coercible to
anything, this should catch them all. I don't expect any of these
to survive all the way to the end of IR generation.
(In case one of these types does slip through, I've left the error case
in checkValid, but I've also put in an assertion. If the fuzzer can
make that assertion fire, we are probably missing a call to coerce()
somewhere.)
This cleanup is meant to help migrate coerce() out of IRGenerator.
Change-Id: I031809adf439b1766048768b782c57e7f2494006
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/371479
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Adds trivial name mangling to the .stage output, so we can verify that
it's working in all places (declarations, references, etc). Also added
another global variable whose initializer is - in turn - another global.
Bug: skia:11295
Change-Id: Ic220bfae0a6d1eeeba66ade30d3d781af15c5dea
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/371477
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Includes variables with and without initializers. Note that both the
.skvm and .stage output is incorrect right now. (No declarations for
global variables in .stage, and the initializer is dropped in .skvm).
Bug: skia:11295
Change-Id: Icb6d797616be6a1bc7cbdc9db4fefa7e30c65656
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/371143
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
None of these are legal in GLSL ES 1.0. Added a new test that previously
compiled without error. Started out with just assignment and equality,
then realized that sequence and ternary should be blocked, too.
Bug: skia:11323
Change-Id: I02691f819565afabeadbb12cab6c07acf40093f7
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/370880
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
When SPIR-V generates function calls to an intrinsic, it assumes that
it can get a pointer to out-parameters referenced by the intrinsic.
This does not account for swizzled out-parameters; these are valid
lvalues, but do not work with getPointer().
The two intrinsics supported by SkSL which have an out-parameter are
frexp and modf, so these tests were fleshed out to trigger the error.
Neither of these are supported in ES2, though, so we cannot test them
via Runtime Effects.
Change-Id: Ib92707a28ba6d1c282d20e29a2a387bddf74ad23
Bug: skia:11052
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/370116
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
The out-param helpers emitted by the Metal code gen (intended to provide
GLSL out-parameter semantics in Metal) emitted bad code if passed the
same variable for two separate out parameters. It would previously
create two parameters in the helper with the same name. The helper
function now omits the name of the second variable in the parameter list
if it is redundant; we already know the caller is passing the same
variable twice.
Change-Id: Ibdc6c02a9e9e4bdb4f4546a25068f2018aa07b10
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/370258
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
GLSL ES2 documentation on out parameters: "Evaluation of an out
parameter results in an l-value that is used to copy out a value when
the function returns."
The inliner does not do any alias checking when inlining an `out` param.
That is, passing the same variable to two separate `out` parameters
would not generate two distinct lvalues in the inlined code; it reuses
the same variable for each out-params in the inlined code.
(Amusingly, our CFG can fully optimize away this test code so it just
returns "red".)
Change-Id: Ib781d2cfdac54f01b6abe159af0c84ff24ff6976
Bug: skia:11326
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/370256
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Multi-dimensional arrays aren't legal in GLSL/SkSL, so this should be
caught and flagged as an error. The parser now verifies that a
variable's type isn't an array-type before accepting a `[` token to
open an array on the variable name.
This CL also refactors the IR generator's `convertArraySize` method to
make sure that various checks are made for all callers. Originally this
restructuring was used to verify array multi-dimensionality, but that
didn't detect errors inside struct declarations (which get no error
checking inside the IR generator) so the IR generator updates no longer
need to check the array dimensions.
Bug: skia:11322
Change-Id: Id33f4bdfb544019ddf995a8196c3c09cfe5a4525
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/369916
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
We now interpret any statement of the form `Type identifier...` as a
var-declaration and report errors as such. Previously, if a var-decl
statement generated an error during parse, we'd report errors as if it
were an expression-statement, which meant that slightly-invalid code
could return out-of-context, misleading errors.
Bug: skia:11287
Change-Id: I2c6cf2984760eb34593c80cb30f8c4e007d42027
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/370036
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Bug: skia:11314
Change-Id: I66476543462ae378a5bfb6cbd902dfa2f5fc45f5
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/369917
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
We don't need to do these tests every time we run CFG optimization; we
can do them once at the end of optimization, as a separate step.
Change-Id: If0e72fbacb938b62387fd2ffdbf34d1153bf3bd4
Bug: skia:11319
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/369481
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
The CL at http://review.skia.org/366399 introduced a bug with
LValue::getPointer. Specifically, getPointer used to return zero when
no pointer is available. (This happens when the LValue is a swizzle.)
That CL changed the error code to -1. However, it did not fix up all
the call sites that checked the return value of getPointer().
This CL fixes up those call sites to use -1 consistently, and adds
TODOs in spots which do not check the result from getPointer() at all
(instead assuming it cannot fail). This will allow swizzled out-
parameters to work in SPIR-V as they did before. (Except in intrinsics,
where they seem to have been broken all along, but those are now marked
with a TODO at least.)
Note that we still do not fully emulate GLSL semantics for out
parameters, as out-parameters should only be copied back to the original
variable at the end of the function call to be fully GLSL compliant.
(This CL also replaces a tuple with a named struct for readability.)
Change-Id: I708dc7a69296a4244ba9ceb85c3e68d1f331bbc9
Bug: skia:11052
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/368618
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
