The output changes here are almost entirely a wash, because we already
had support for caching scalars and vectors. Almost all changes are just
inconsequential reorderings of IDs, and the removal of RelaxedPrecision
decorators on constants (which were not meaningful).
Change-Id: I45340c4a240cb504b7c4a934b3db178d2f39ec99
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/528709
Reviewed-by: Arman Uguray <armansito@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Previously, a struct containing a vardecl with multiple declarations
would interpret arrays incorrectly. An array would be applied to ALL
variables in the decl after its initial appearance. That is,
`int w, x[10], y, z;` would be interpreted as
`int w, x[10], y[10], z[10];`.
This is now fixed and our test case runs as expected.
Change-Id: I5b4a617c58cdfb83face651effd42770a1f68638
Bug: oss-fuzz:37622
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/441879
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
The fuzzer detected a serious parsing error; a struct containing a
vardecl with multiple declarations would interpret arrays incorrectly.
An array would be applied to ALL variables in the decl after its initial
appearance. That is, `int w, x[10], y, z;` would be interpreted as
`int w, x[10], y[10], z[10];`. The fuzzer caught this by putting two
arrayed variables in a row; the second variable was interpreted as a
nested array, which led to an assertion.
This CL contains a simple hand-written test case demonstrating the bug,
with the fix coming in a followup.
Change-Id: I42d7372ba77fa1528ae24eb8c29a2e5903784139
Bug: oss-fuzz:37622
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/441878
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
