SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
instance, not the whole thread pool.
This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
for CPU .skp rendering.
Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
with all other tests now.
This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
from DM, which we don't use.
On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.
BUG=skia:
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9c7207b5dc71dc5a96a2eb107d401133333d5b6fR=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/531653002
Reason for revert:
Leaks, leaks, leaks.
Original issue's description:
> SkThreadPool ~~> SkTaskGroup
>
> SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
> one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
> and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
> instance, not the whole thread pool.
>
> This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
> tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
> quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
> to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
> to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
> places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
> for CPU .skp rendering.
>
> Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
> can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
> to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
> with all other tests now.
>
> This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
> from DM, which we don't use.
>
> On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
> Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
> show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
> minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.
>
> BUG=skia:
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9c7207b5dc71dc5a96a2eb107d401133333d5b6fR=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, reed@google.com, mtklein@chromium.orgTBR=bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, caryclark@google.com, mtklein@chromium.org, reed@google.com
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Author: mtklein@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/533393002
SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
instance, not the whole thread pool.
This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
for CPU .skp rendering.
Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
with all other tests now.
This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
from DM, which we don't use.
On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.
BUG=skia:
R=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/531653002
The main meat of things is in SkThreadPool. We can now give SkThreadPool a
type for each thread to create and destroy on its local stack. It's TLS
without going through SkTLS.
I've split the DM tasks into CpuTasks that run on threads with no TLS, and
GpuTasks that run on threads with a thread local GrContextFactory.
The old CpuTask and GpuTask have been renamed to CpuGMTask and GpuGMTask.
Upshot: default run of out/Debug/dm goes from ~45 seconds to ~20 seconds.
BUG=skia:
R=bsalomon@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/179233005
git-svn-id: http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@13632 2bbb7eff-a529-9590-31e7-b0007b416f81
Also:
- make GrMemoryPoolBenches threadsafe
- some tweaks to various DM code
- rename GM::shortName() to getName() to match benches and tests
On my desktop, (289 GMs, 617 benches) x 4 configs, 227 tests takes 46s in Debug, 14s in Release. (Still minutes faster than running tests && bench && gm.) GPU singlethreading is definitely the limiting factor again; going to reexamine whether that's helpful to thread it again.
BUG=skia:
R=reed@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, mtklein@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/178473006
git-svn-id: http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@13603 2bbb7eff-a529-9590-31e7-b0007b416f81
- refactor GYPs and a few flags
- make GPU tests grab a thread-local GrContextFactory when needed as we do in DM for GMs
- add a few more UI features to make DM more like tests
I believe this makes the program 'tests' obsolete.
It should be somewhat faster to run the two sets together than running the old binaries serially:
- serial: tests 20s (3m18s CPU), dm 21s (3m01s CPU)
- together: 27s (6m21s CPU)
Next up is to incorporate benches. I'm only planning there on a single-pass sanity check, so that won't obsolete the program 'bench' just yet.
Tested: out/Debug/tests && out/Debug/dm && echo ok
BUG=skia:
Committed: http://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=13586R=reed@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, mtklein@google.com, tfarina@chromium.org
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/178273002
git-svn-id: http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@13592 2bbb7eff-a529-9590-31e7-b0007b416f81
- refactor GYPs and a few flags
- make GPU tests grab a thread-local GrContextFactory when needed as we do in DM for GMs
- add a few more UI features to make DM more like tests
I believe this makes the program 'tests' obsolete.
It should be somewhat faster to run the two sets together than running the old binaries serially:
- serial: tests 20s (3m18s CPU), dm 21s (3m01s CPU)
- together: 27s (6m21s CPU)
Next up is to incorporate benches. I'm only planning there on a single-pass sanity check, so that won't obsolete the program 'bench' just yet.
Tested: out/Debug/tests && out/Debug/dm && echo ok
BUG=skia:
R=reed@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, mtklein@google.com, tfarina@chromium.org
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/178273002
git-svn-id: http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@13586 2bbb7eff-a529-9590-31e7-b0007b416f81
