'static const' means, there must be at most one of these, and initialize it at
compile time if possible or runtime if necessary. This leads to unexpected
code execution, and TSAN* will complain about races on the guard variables.
Generally 'constexpr' or 'const' are better choices. Neither can cause races:
they're either intialized at compile time (constexpr) or intialized each time
independently (const).
This CL prefers constexpr where possible, and uses const where not. It even
prefers constexpr over const where they don't make a difference... I want to have
lots of examples of constexpr for people to see and mimic.
The scoped-to-class static has nothing to do with any of this, and is not changed.
* Not yet on the bots, which use an older TSAN.
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2300623005
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2300623005
This seems to work well for miter and bevel joins with the resulting stroke and fill path remaining convex. There seems to be an issue with round joins where the outer generated shell is usually not convex. Without this CL the resulting stroke & filled paths are always concave.
Perf-wise (on Windows):
convex-lineonly-paths-stroke-and-fill bench
(in ms) w/o w/CL %decrease
8888 2.88 2.01 30.2
gpu 4.4 1.38 68.6
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2275243003
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2275243003
- input param to addFoo (e.g. addRect), where only CW or CCW are valid)
- output param from computing functions, that sometimes return kUnknown
This CL's intent is to split these into distinct enums/features:
- Direction (public) loses kUnknown, and is only used for input
- FirstDirection (private) is used for computing the first direction we see when analyzing a contour
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1176953002
