sk_tool_utils doesn't really fit the naming convention
the rest of code under tools/ tends to use.
Change-Id: I45326a174101c6eb4b6149e9c742f658f2fd23b1
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/202313
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Change-Id: I0326eb9cc1e1e38b0fdc417567987a595f9021d2
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/202310
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
This should make reproducing certain fuzzes easier between oss-fuzz
and a typical dev's desktop.
This was the most straight-forward way I could think of to
accomplish this. An ideal solution would "compile" a set of
fonts that was not the test set and embed it, but I lack the
domain knowledge to craft such a set.
If this method works ok, we can explore making the font set
more robust and varied.
Bug: 818769
Change-Id: I03eb2bc316caf7aec3ffa88e59ff29d76c8557ec
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/177800
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Wagner <bungeman@google.com>
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I0d34bfff4a53f831986614844bdc955935f28501
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/115582
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>