SkStream is a stateful object, so it does not make sense for it to have
multiple owners. Make SkStream inherit directly from SkNoncopyable.
Update methods which previously called SkStream::ref() (e.g.
SkImageDecoder::buildTileIndex() and SkFrontBufferedStream::Create(),
which required the existing owners to call SkStream::unref()) to take
ownership of their SkStream parameters and delete when done (including
on failure).
Switch all SkAutoTUnref<SkStream>s to SkAutoTDelete<SkStream>s. In some
cases this means heap allocating streams that were previously stack
allocated.
Respect ownership rules of SkTypeface::CreateFromStream() and
SkImageDecoder::buildTileIndex().
Update the comments for exceptional methods which do not affect the
ownership of their SkStream parameters (e.g.
SkPicture::CreateFromStream() and SkTypeface::Deserialize()) to be
explicit about ownership.
Remove test_stream_life, which tested that buildTileIndex() behaved
correctly when SkStream was a ref counted object. The test does not
make sense now that it is not.
In SkPDFStream, remove the SkMemoryStream member. Instead of using it,
create a new SkMemoryStream to pass to fDataStream (which is now an
SkAutoTDelete).
Make other pdf rasterizers behave like SkPDFDocumentToBitmap.
SkPDFDocumentToBitmap delete the SkStream, so do the same in the
following pdf rasterizers:
SkPopplerRasterizePDF
SkNativeRasterizePDF
SkNoRasterizePDF
Requires a change to Android, which currently treats SkStreams as ref
counted objects.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/849103004
This will hold us closer to the principle that the test name (and only the test
name) should correspond to expected output. By the same reasoning, mix in the
number of subsets: if that changes, the expected output also changes.
BUG=skia:3255
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/863723002
BUG=skia:3255
I think this supports everything DM used to, but has completely refactored how
it works to fit the design in the bug.
Configs like "tiles-gpu" are automatically wired up.
I wouldn't suggest looking at this as a diff. There's just a bunch of deleted
files, a few new files, and one new file that shares a name with a deleted file
(DM.cpp).
NOTREECHECKS=true
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/709d2c3e5062c5b57f91273bfc11a751f5b2bb88
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/788243008
Reason for revert:
plenty of data
Original issue's description:
> Sketch DM refactor.
>
> BUG=skia:3255
>
>
> I think this supports everything DM used to, but has completely refactored how
> it works to fit the design in the bug.
>
> Configs like "tiles-gpu" are automatically wired up.
>
> I wouldn't suggest looking at this as a diff. There's just a bunch of deleted
> files, a few new files, and one new file that shares a name with a deleted file
> (DM.cpp).
>
> NOTREECHECKS=true
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/709d2c3e5062c5b57f91273bfc11a751f5b2bb88TBR=bsalomon@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:3255
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/853883004
BUG=skia:3255
I think this supports everything DM used to, but has completely refactored how
it works to fit the design in the bug.
Configs like "tiles-gpu" are automatically wired up.
I wouldn't suggest looking at this as a diff. There's just a bunch of deleted
files, a few new files, and one new file that shares a name with a deleted file
(DM.cpp).
NOTREECHECKS=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/788243008
