This differed from the separate versions in that it snapped to zero.
It was also strictly worse than calling the two separate versions.
Most clients don't need the snapping, so just call the two existing
functions. For clients that need the snapping, call new variants of
each that do snap.
Change-Id: Ia4e09fd9651932fe15caeab1399df7f6281bdc17
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/205303
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Just ensuring we have coverage for this case.
Change-Id: Ifcded974068e9ef90d0eb0f07eb90e0bd563d7c7
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/113461
Reviewed-by: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Jim Van Verth <jvanverth@google.com>
'static const' means, there must be at most one of these, and initialize it at
compile time if possible or runtime if necessary. This leads to unexpected
code execution, and TSAN* will complain about races on the guard variables.
Generally 'constexpr' or 'const' are better choices. Neither can cause races:
they're either intialized at compile time (constexpr) or intialized each time
independently (const).
This CL prefers constexpr where possible, and uses const where not. It even
prefers constexpr over const where they don't make a difference... I want to have
lots of examples of constexpr for people to see and mimic.
The scoped-to-class static has nothing to do with any of this, and is not changed.
* Not yet on the bots, which use an older TSAN.
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2300623005
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2300623005
