Change-Id: If51be35205b40c4a22979a4b49b031126af1dde7
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/302500
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
This reverts commit 70474c1cb0.
Reason for revert: bot build failure
Original change's description:
> Remove custom SkSort algorithms.
>
> SortBench shows that SkTQSort and SkTHeapSort are inferior to std::sort.
> The difference is small on randomized inputs, but quite significant for
> semi-ordered inputs (forward/backward/repeated). There doesn't seem to
> to be any compelling advantage to SkTQSort.
>
> Nanobench results: https://screenshot.googleplex.com/9JOLV1d6Z0u
>
> (These performance numbers are from an optimized build my local machine;
> it's possible that we might see different results on the test bots.)
>
> Change-Id: Iaf19563041547eae7de2953be249129108f093b1
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/302295
> Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
TBR=mtklein@google.com,brianosman@google.com,johnstiles@google.com
Change-Id: I1126dd4cda95716dac225ad32d5b0e5cf3f09421
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/302447
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
SortBench shows that SkTQSort and SkTHeapSort are inferior to std::sort.
The difference is small on randomized inputs, but quite significant for
semi-ordered inputs (forward/backward/repeated). There doesn't seem to
to be any compelling advantage to SkTQSort.
Nanobench results: https://screenshot.googleplex.com/9JOLV1d6Z0u
(These performance numbers are from an optimized build my local machine;
it's possible that we might see different results on the test bots.)
Change-Id: Iaf19563041547eae7de2953be249129108f093b1
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/302295
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Use std::min and std::max everywhere.
SkTPin still exists. We can't use std::clamp yet, and even when
we can, it has undefined behavior with NaN. SkTPin is written
to ensure that we return a value in the [lo, hi] range.
Change-Id: I506852a36e024ae405358d5078a872e2c77fa71e
Docs-Preview: https://skia.org/?cl=269357
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/269357
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
Current strategy: everything from the top
Things to look at first are the manual changes:
- added tools/rewrite_includes.py
- removed -Idirectives from BUILD.gn
- various compile.sh simplifications
- tweak tools/embed_resources.py
- update gn/find_headers.py to write paths from the top
- update gn/gn_to_bp.py SkUserConfig.h layout
so that #include "include/config/SkUserConfig.h" always
gets the header we want.
No-Presubmit: true
Change-Id: I73a4b181654e0e38d229bc456c0d0854bae3363e
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/209706
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hal Canary <halcanary@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Florin Malita <fmalita@chromium.org>
When the path was "large" (as defined by ScaleFactor(...)), the computed
bounds would not be adjusted to the correct space. Make sure to scale
the result in those cases.
BUG=chromium:678162
Change-Id: Ia2eb94050c4620286e9abb69976dbc0202ecc307
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/6501
Reviewed-by: Cary Clark <caryclark@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Cary Clark <caryclark@google.com>
Add support for tight bounds to detect and return moveTo
followed by close or zero-length lineTo.
Also short circuit so that hard work is avoided when
the path bounds is also the tight bounds.
Avoid doing work if the bounds can be trivially computed.
Include naked moveTo coordinates in the tight bounds.
R=fmalita@chromium.org
BUG=skia:5555, skia:5553
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2394443004
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2394443004
Replace the implicit curve intersection with a geometric curve intersection. The implicit intersection proved mathematically unstable and took a long time to zero in on an answer.
Use pointers instead of indices to refer to parts of curves. Indices required awkward renumbering.
Unify t and point values so that small intervals can be eliminated in one pass.
Break cubics up front to eliminate loops and cusps.
Make the Simplify and Op code more regular and eliminate arbitrary differences.
Add a builder that takes an array of paths and operators.
Delete unused code.
BUG=skia:3588
R=reed@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1037573004
SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
instance, not the whole thread pool.
This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
for CPU .skp rendering.
Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
with all other tests now.
This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
from DM, which we don't use.
On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.
BUG=skia:
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9c7207b5dc71dc5a96a2eb107d401133333d5b6fR=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/531653002
Reason for revert:
Leaks, leaks, leaks.
Original issue's description:
> SkThreadPool ~~> SkTaskGroup
>
> SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
> one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
> and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
> instance, not the whole thread pool.
>
> This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
> tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
> quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
> to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
> to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
> places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
> for CPU .skp rendering.
>
> Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
> can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
> to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
> with all other tests now.
>
> This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
> from DM, which we don't use.
>
> On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
> Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
> show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
> minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.
>
> BUG=skia:
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9c7207b5dc71dc5a96a2eb107d401133333d5b6fR=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, reed@google.com, mtklein@chromium.orgTBR=bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, caryclark@google.com, mtklein@chromium.org, reed@google.com
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Author: mtklein@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/533393002
SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
instance, not the whole thread pool.
This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
for CPU .skp rendering.
Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
with all other tests now.
This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
from DM, which we don't use.
On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.
BUG=skia:
R=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/531653002
Implement path tight bounds using path ops machinery. This is not
as efficient as it could be; for instance, internally, it creates
a path ops structure more suited to intersection. If this shows
up as a performance bottleneck, it could be improved.
Fix path ops gyp files, which have fallen out of sync with other
tests.
R=mtklein@google.com, bsalomon@google.com
TBR=mtklein
BUG=skia:1712
Author: caryclark@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/348343002
