Previously, these tests were never actually executed, only read during
code review. They are now properly tested for correctness whenever dm
is run. Non-ES2 compliant statements (do/while/switch) are unfortunately
excluded here, as they are not compatible with Runtime Effects yet.
Change-Id: I965c782baad6f8dd3961a400ae791fb2c1f844d3
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/389296
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
This will be implemented in Metal and SPIR-V in followup CLs.
Change-Id: I397b4db40b15dd54cf1d8a17f414c3fe184b48d2
Bug: skia:10851
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/387638
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
This allows us to remove 100 LOC from the inliner and is very unlikely
to affect any existing benchmark. We don't have any evidence to support
the idea that a one-iteration `for` loop with `continue`-based exits
will be any faster than a standard function call on any existing GPU.
Our fragment processors are generally written to avoid early returns,
in large part to avoid hitting this path.
This drastically impacts BlendEnum.sksl (which can no longer flatten out
a switch over every blend function in SkSL) but is otherwise a wash.
See: http://go/optimization-in-sksl-inliner suggestion 4(a)
Change-Id: I1f9c27bcd7a8de46cc4e8d0b9768d75957cf1c50
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/385377
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This reverts commit 92748af1a5.
Reason for revert: SkSLCommaSideEffects_GPU crashing on Android
Original change's description:
> Inline functions of the form 'return (expr)' only.
>
> This drastically reduces the number of functions which we allow to be
> inlined. If this change does not hurt our performance, it will allow us
> to trivially remove hundreds of LOC. All current data leads us to
> believe that it may affect the Mali 400 but is highly unlikely to change
> results on any other device in the tree.
>
> More info: http://go/optimization-in-sksl-inliner
>
> Change-Id: Ia6b706742ce5407453e0e697b6c1f9201084c0e8
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384858
> Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
TBR=brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com
Change-Id: I6a670dacaa58fe3386ff50375ac6d1cac4fd7f2c
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/385161
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This drastically reduces the number of functions which we allow to be
inlined. If this change does not hurt our performance, it will allow us
to trivially remove hundreds of LOC. All current data leads us to
believe that it may affect the Mali 400 but is highly unlikely to change
results on any other device in the tree.
More info: http://go/optimization-in-sksl-inliner
Change-Id: Ia6b706742ce5407453e0e697b6c1f9201084c0e8
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384858
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
I ran into an issue in an upcoming CL which generated a particularly
ugly switch statement:
switch (x) {
default:
discard;}
So I cleaned this up, and while resolving this issue, managed to improve
a bunch of existing codegen as well. The formatting change has been
split out to a separate CL since it impacts so many golden outputs.
Change-Id: I7a6be29903c47560dcc7f6acd3ef15fd0c5c3c50
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384179
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
This CL will be used to test for potential performance regressions (or
improvements) that we might cause by disabling this optimization pass.
It will be reverted in ~1 day.
Change-Id: I26b7687c341eb6d81231406381c39869cfccf6d6
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/381259
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
This reverts commit 50b1b2b90d.
Reason for revert: ending experiment
Original change's description:
> Disable control-flow analysis in SkSL. (Performance experiment)
>
> This CL will be used to test for potential performance regressions (or
> improvements?) that we might incur by disabling this optimization pass.
>
> It will be reverted in ~1 day.
>
> Change-Id: I775cdb0c95df81fa25ebbd66e4ff01f64c660f68
> Bug: skia:11319
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/378456
> Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
TBR=brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com
Change-Id: Ie385a82db237ff5651348d82b9651f8ba09375b9
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: skia:11319
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/379581
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This CL will be used to test for potential performance regressions (or
improvements?) that we might incur by disabling this optimization pass.
It will be reverted in ~1 day.
Change-Id: I775cdb0c95df81fa25ebbd66e4ff01f64c660f68
Bug: skia:11319
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/378456
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
The optimizer now properly recognizes all types of exits from a switch
statement. Break, continue and return are all potential exits and need
to be considered when determining the exit path from the switch.
Previously, dead code elimination was hiding the effects of this bug
from us, but it meant that an optimized switch had the potential to
generate lots of worthless IR nodes which then needed to be detected and
eliminated by the CFG. In particular, this affected the enum form of
blend, causing a catastrophic amount of extra work to be done.
Change-Id: If857e38cadfc016884624ea4db25a273ad3dce5b
Bug: skia:11352
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372958
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
This will allow us to load these inputs for unit testing in `dm`.
Change-Id: Id256ba7c30d3ec94b98048e47af44cf9efe580d5
Bug: skia:11009
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/357282
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>