Now that the various Metal and SPIR-V bugs have been shaken out, we can
enable these tests. Knock on wood.
Change-Id: If4b4e302cfdd91464aaf00bc9639989de5e49aac
Bug: skia:11985
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/408640
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
This is a clone of the Metal test. (This can be moved into shared/ and
enabled as a real test once the codegen is fixed.)
At present, this test generates broken code; everything is writing an
SpvOpMatrixTimesScalar opcode regardless of the actual operation being
performed.
Change-Id: If06b4196e7d9be36e41c5c60c006b2a713cc25d8
Bug: skia:11985
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/408297
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
This reverts commit a04692f69e.
Reason for revert: Angry Vulkan bots.
Original change's description:
> Fixed a number of spots where we should have been using RelaxedPrecision
>
> Our SPIR-V output was missing many RelaxedPrecision decorations, which
> was presumably impacting performance.
>
> Change-Id: Iee32d4a42f37af167fe0e45f3db94c2142129695
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384178
> Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
TBR=egdaniel@google.com,brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com
Change-Id: If4fe945cb363c9b61b5a4abfde649a437689d2eb
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384217
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Our SPIR-V output was missing many RelaxedPrecision decorations, which
was presumably impacting performance.
Change-Id: Iee32d4a42f37af167fe0e45f3db94c2142129695
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384178
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Added asserts that verify we don't try to emit the same struct or array
with two different memory layout rules. Some code paths were failing to
inspect the associated variable, leading to incorrect errors about the
attached offsets of members.
Added a test case that triggered that error, and also triggers the new
asserts.
Then, fixed the underlying cause: writing out the struct definition as a
side effect of accessing a member in getLValue().
Bug: skia:11205
Change-Id: I6e5fb76ea918ec9ff10425f2d519ddbc54404b27
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/357436
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
This will allow us to load these inputs for unit testing in `dm`.
Change-Id: Id256ba7c30d3ec94b98048e47af44cf9efe580d5
Bug: skia:11009
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/357282
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
