This was (crudely) automated with shell scripts:
http://go/paste/5484300603490304
Change-Id: Ic9e1c93112772d303d1158eb26d995f27b439eba
Bug: skia:12665
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/505637
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Our analysis pass for checking if an expression is a constant-expression
would assert if the expression contained a TypeReference or a
FunctionReference. This could happen if you passed in an expression that
had not yet been type-coerced. This check seemed overly strict, so the
assertion has been removed (although such an expression will be reported
as 'not a constant expression').
This bit us in global-variable declaration, where we checked if a
global variable's initial-value expression was constant before coercing
it to the variable's type. This has also been reordered so the type-
coercion happens first. (Either order is now valid, but the type-
coercion related errors tend to be more detailed.)
Change-Id: I5104cf817767d65fd84421243d9530734ba624a9
Bug: oss-fuzz:37710
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/442693
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
The fuzzer invented a much more elaborate example, but I was able to
winnow it down to a simple otherwise-normal test case. This also fixes
a latent DSL bug; DSL functions were not updating the list of referenced
intrinsics, so the compiler might emit finished programs that called
built-in functions that didn't exist in the code.
Change-Id: I095bb566b9db9f87cbe9460732c300b7973eb112
Bug: oss-fuzz:37659
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/442325
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
