Change-Id: Ic44e24057b95bb014504f02a736fb4341afc8971
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/304856
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Current strategy: everything from the top
Things to look at first are the manual changes:
- added tools/rewrite_includes.py
- removed -Idirectives from BUILD.gn
- various compile.sh simplifications
- tweak tools/embed_resources.py
- update gn/find_headers.py to write paths from the top
- update gn/gn_to_bp.py SkUserConfig.h layout
so that #include "include/config/SkUserConfig.h" always
gets the header we want.
No-Presubmit: true
Change-Id: I73a4b181654e0e38d229bc456c0d0854bae3363e
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/209706
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hal Canary <halcanary@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Florin Malita <fmalita@chromium.org>
Also adds a presubmit to prevent adding trailing whitespace to source
code in the future.
Change-Id: I41a4df81487f6f00aa19b188f0cac6a3377efde6
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/57380
Reviewed-by: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <bungeman@google.com>
Currently, Chromium stores segmented data in a SharedBuffer and appends
to SkRWBuffer one segment at a time:
const char* segment = 0;
for (size_t length = data->getSomeData(segment, m_rwBuffer->size());
length; length = data->getSomeData(segment, m_rwBuffer->size())) {
m_rwBuffer->append(segment, length, remaining);
}
This can yield a bunch of just-above-4k allocations => wasted RAM due to
internal fragmentation.
Ideally, we'd want a SkRWBuffer::reserve(size_t bytes) API, but the
current internals don't support that trivially.
Alternatively, the caller can pass a reserve hint at append() time.
BUG=chromium:651698
R=scroggo@google.com,reed@google.com
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2385803002
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2385803002
Do not call SkBufferHead::validate in SkROBuffer's destructor, which
may be called in a separate thread from SkRWBuffer::append. validate()
reads SkBufferBlock::fUsed, and append() writes to it, resulting in
a data race.
Update some comments to be more clear about how it is safe to use
these classes across threads.
Test the readers in separate threads.
In addition, make sure it is safe to create a reader even when no
data has been appended. Add tests for this case.
Mark a parameter to SkBufferHead::validate() as const, reflecting
its use.
BUG=chromium:601578
BUG=chromium:605479
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1871953002
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1871953002
Do not call SkBufferHead::validate in SkROBuffer's destructor, which
may be called in a separate thread from SkRWBuffer::append. validate()
reads SkBufferBlock::fUsed, and append() writes to it, resulting in
a data race.
Update some comments to be more clear about how it is safe to use
these classes across threads.
Test the readers in separate threads.
In addition, make sure it is safe to create a reader even when no
data has been appended. Add tests for this case.
Mark a parameter to SkBufferHead::validate() as const, reflecting
its use.
BUG=chromium:601578
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1871953002
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1871953002
