SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
instance, not the whole thread pool.
This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
for CPU .skp rendering.
Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
with all other tests now.
This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
from DM, which we don't use.
On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.
BUG=skia:
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9c7207b5dc71dc5a96a2eb107d401133333d5b6fR=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/531653002
Reason for revert:
Leaks, leaks, leaks.
Original issue's description:
> SkThreadPool ~~> SkTaskGroup
>
> SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
> one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
> and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
> instance, not the whole thread pool.
>
> This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
> tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
> quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
> to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
> to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
> places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
> for CPU .skp rendering.
>
> Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
> can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
> to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
> with all other tests now.
>
> This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
> from DM, which we don't use.
>
> On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
> Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
> show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
> minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.
>
> BUG=skia:
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9c7207b5dc71dc5a96a2eb107d401133333d5b6fR=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, reed@google.com, mtklein@chromium.orgTBR=bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, caryclark@google.com, mtklein@chromium.org, reed@google.com
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Author: mtklein@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/533393002
SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
instance, not the whole thread pool.
This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
for CPU .skp rendering.
Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
with all other tests now.
This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
from DM, which we don't use.
On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.
BUG=skia:
R=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/531653002
For now this only creates a degenerate bounding box hierarchy where all ops
just have maximal bounds. I will flesh out FillBounds in future CL(s).
Not quite sure why QuadTree and TileGrid aren't drawing right---haven't even
looked at the diffs yet---so I've disabled those test modes for now. RTree
seems fine, so that'll at least get us coverage for all this new plumbing.
BUG=skia:
R=robertphillips@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/454123003
Replay isn't that helpful of a test any more now that we have the more
stringent Quilt tests. Quilt was missing bounding box hierarchies, though,
while Replay was sort of testing RTree (pointlessly, as it was drawing without
any clip). Now Quilt does everything, testing RTree, QuadTree, and TileGrid.
Quilt mode now falls back to drawing all at once (i.e. Replay) for GMs that
don't tile perfectly. Still a TODO to make this check more flexible than exact
pixel matches.
Two GMs fail when using a BBH:
- imageresizetiled
- resizeimagefilter
We think we're not adjusting the bounds of save layers by their paint.
This is probably a bug, but one to be fixed separately from adding new tests.
BUG=skia:
R=robertphillips@google.com, mtklein@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/377373003
Now that we're drawing tiles threaded like implside painting, remove the checks
that those lock counts are balanced. They're just not right for anyone anymore.
SkBitmaps themselves are not threadsafe (even const ones), so shallow copy them
on playback of an SkRecord. (The underlying SkPixelRefs are threadsafe.)
Simplify quilt drawing by using SkBitmap::extractSubset. No need for locking.
Bump up to 256x256 tiles. 16x16 tiles just murders performance (way too much
contention). This has the nice side effect of letting us enable a bunch more
GMs for quilt mode; they drew wrong with small tiles but exactly right with large.
BUG=171776
R=reed@google.com, mtklein@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/371023005
- Rename TileGrid -> Quilt to avoid the name overload.
- Tag all failing GMs with kSkipTiled_Flag.
You may be wondering, do any GMs pass? Yes, some do! And that trends towards all of them as we increase --quiltTile.
Two GMs only fail in --quilt mode in 565. Otherwise all GMs which fail are skipped, and those which don't fail aren't. (The 8888 variants of those two GMs are skipped even though they pass.)
BUG=skia:2477
R=reed@google.com, mtklein@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/256373002
git-svn-id: http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@14457 2bbb7eff-a529-9590-31e7-b0007b416f81
