201295.jpg on HP z620
(300x280, most common form of sRGB profile)
QCMS Xform 0.495 ms
Skia Old Xform 0.235 ms
Skia NEW Xform 0.423 ms
Vs Old Code 0.56x
Vs QCMS 1.17x
So to summarize, we are now much slower than before,
but still a bit faster than QCMS. And now we are also
far more accurate than QCMS :).
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2060823003
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2060823003
Because we recognize commonly used gamma tables and
parameters as 2.2f, about 98% of jpegs with color profiles
will pass through this xform (assuming the dst is also
2.2f). Sample size is 10,322 jpegs.
I won't go crazy with performance numbers because this is
a work in progress, particularly in terms of correctness.
201295.jpg on HP z620
(300x280, most common form of sRGB profile)
Decode Time + QCMS Xform 1.28 ms
QCMS Xform Only 0.495 ms
Decode Time + Skia Opt Xform 1.01 ms
Skia Opt Xform Only 0.235 ms
Decode Time + Xform Speed-up 1.27x
Xform Only Speed-up 2.11x
FWIW, Skia xform time before these optimizations was
41.1 ms. But we expected that code to be slow.
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2046013002
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Ubuntu-GCC-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-SKNX_NO_SIMD-Trybot
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2046013002
