Change-Id: I34ded4a4b9c4600eaf801eec121ca851e04a6c23
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/211586
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Current strategy: everything from the top
Things to look at first are the manual changes:
- added tools/rewrite_includes.py
- removed -Idirectives from BUILD.gn
- various compile.sh simplifications
- tweak tools/embed_resources.py
- update gn/find_headers.py to write paths from the top
- update gn/gn_to_bp.py SkUserConfig.h layout
so that #include "include/config/SkUserConfig.h" always
gets the header we want.
No-Presubmit: true
Change-Id: I73a4b181654e0e38d229bc456c0d0854bae3363e
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/209706
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hal Canary <halcanary@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Florin Malita <fmalita@chromium.org>
'static const' means, there must be at most one of these, and initialize it at
compile time if possible or runtime if necessary. This leads to unexpected
code execution, and TSAN* will complain about races on the guard variables.
Generally 'constexpr' or 'const' are better choices. Neither can cause races:
they're either intialized at compile time (constexpr) or intialized each time
independently (const).
This CL prefers constexpr where possible, and uses const where not. It even
prefers constexpr over const where they don't make a difference... I want to have
lots of examples of constexpr for people to see and mimic.
The scoped-to-class static has nothing to do with any of this, and is not changed.
* Not yet on the bots, which use an older TSAN.
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2300623005
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2300623005
Reason for revert:
Breaks Chrome with this link error: ../../third_party/skia/include/effects/SkMorphologyImageFilter.h:75: error: undefined reference to 'SkMorphologyImageFilter::SkMorphologyImageFilter(int, int, SkImageFilter*, SkImageFilter::CropRect const*)'
../../third_party/skia/include/effects/SkMorphologyImageFilter.h:104: error: undefined reference to 'SkMorphologyImageFilter::SkMorphologyImageFilter(int, int, SkImageFilter*, SkImageFilter::CropRect const*)'
Presumably due to code in third_party/WebKit/Source/platform/graphics/filters/FEMorphology.cpp that contains:
#include "SkMorphologyImageFilter.h"
...
if (m_type == FEMORPHOLOGY_OPERATOR_DILATE)
return adoptRef(SkDilateImageFilter::Create(radiusX, radiusY, input.get(), &rect));
return adoptRef(SkErodeImageFilter::Create(radiusX, radiusY, input.get(), &rect));
Original issue's description:
> factories should return baseclass, allowing the impl to specialize
>
> waiting on https://codereview.chromium.org/1386163002/# to land
>
> BUG=skia:4424
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/80a6dcaa1b757826ed7414f64b035d512d9ccbf8TBR=senorblanco@google.com,robertphillips@google.com,reed@google.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:4424
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1389063002
To avoid breaking existing SKPs, add a deserialization stub which
unflattens SkBitmapSource records to SkImageSources.
R=reed@google.com,mtklein@google.com,robertphillips@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1363913002
Reason for revert:
Blink
Original issue's description:
> Fix dst bound reported by SkTileImageFilter
>
> In the example from the bug we had the filter DAG:
>
> color filter (table)
> 0: xfermode filter (arith)
> 0: tile filter [0,80,34,114] -> [0,80,800,480]
> 0: color filter (table)
> 0: bitmap src 34x34 -> [0,80,34,114]
> 1: color filter (table)
> 0: picture filter [0, 80, 800, 480]
>
> computeFastBounds was coming out of the DAG with a bound of [0,80,34,114] which didn't represent the pixels that would be drawn.
>
> This CL updates SkTileImageFilter to correctly set the bound for the pixels it will hit.
>
> BUG=493783
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/05be93bbdf09576f7903130e3b106b0a8c7c4b4e
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/0be685755f942baea26c66a87226b569fc17e960TBR=reed@google.com,senorblanco@google.com,senorblanco@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=493783
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1156583004
In the example from the bug we had the filter DAG:
color filter (table)
0: xfermode filter (arith)
0: tile filter [0,80,34,114] -> [0,80,800,480]
0: color filter (table)
0: bitmap src 34x34 -> [0,80,34,114]
1: color filter (table)
0: picture filter [0, 80, 800, 480]
computeFastBounds was coming out of the DAG with a bound of [0,80,34,114] which didn't represent the pixels that would be drawn.
This CL updates SkTileImageFilter to correctly set the bound for the pixels it will hit.
BUG=493783
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/05be93bbdf09576f7903130e3b106b0a8c7c4b4e
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1152553006
Reason for revert:
breaking tests
Original issue's description:
> Fix dst bound reported by SkTileImageFilter
>
> In the example from the bug we had the filter DAG:
>
> color filter (table)
> 0: xfermode filter (arith)
> 0: tile filter [0,80,34,114] -> [0,80,800,480]
> 0: color filter (table)
> 0: bitmap src 34x34 -> [0,80,34,114]
> 1: color filter (table)
> 0: picture filter [0, 80, 800, 480]
>
> computeFastBounds was coming out of the DAG with a bound of [0,80,34,114] which didn't represent the pixels that would be drawn.
>
> This CL updates SkTileImageFilter to correctly set the bound for the pixels it will hit.
>
> BUG=493783
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/05be93bbdf09576f7903130e3b106b0a8c7c4b4eTBR=reed@google.com,senorblanco@google.com,senorblanco@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=493783
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1143083006
In the example from the bug we had the filter DAG:
color filter (table)
0: xfermode filter (arith)
0: tile filter [0,80,34,114] -> [0,80,800,480]
0: color filter (table)
0: bitmap src 34x34 -> [0,80,34,114]
1: color filter (table)
0: picture filter [0, 80, 800, 480]
computeFastBounds was coming out of the DAG with a bound of [0,80,34,114] which didn't represent the pixels that would be drawn.
This CL updates SkTileImageFilter to correctly set the bound for the pixels it will hit.
BUG=493783
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1152553006