Each recipe now includes its own setup steps.
Bug: skia:6473
Change-Id: I97eab2cd63f5004c07408e844cbbed735aac355f
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/125660
Commit-Queue: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Having removed the NVPR text renderer, the nvprdit* configs are no longer interesting/useful.
Change-Id: Ic4b9d6507d3e3595723a27636cb58b5e811fb3a3
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/105563
Reviewed-by: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Robert Phillips <robertphillips@google.com>
Bug: skia:6687
Change-Id: I1562d7e9ded7f1be8a7ddc0c2341e54d5abbc0ae
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/97901
Reviewed-by: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Bug: skia:2679
Change-Id: Ia462af01b9832da90206b9e9be2278cb48c6c502
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/86401
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
These were removed in
https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/78640
However, we've now decided on the 640 rather than the 540 due to
inventory.
No-Try: true
Change-Id: Icf6db636287e151d3dd3ac74cfddf8f6bd3bea6a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/87202
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
This reverts commit 43307c09b9.
Reason for revert: Fixed this time. Echo 1 > already online cpu
returns exit code 1, which makes python over-react.
Original change's description:
> Revert "Disable extra CPUs during Nanobench"
>
> This reverts commit 32af335e7a.
>
> Reason for revert: many unhappy android bots
>
> Original change's description:
> > Disable extra CPUs during Nanobench
> >
> > The previous experiment revealed that nanobench can
> > run on any of the online CPUs, so rather than put
> > the ones we don't need/want into powersave mode, just
> > disable them.
> >
> > Maybe in the future we can run CPU tests on the big
> > or LITTLE cpus to get perf data on higher end or
> > lower end cpus, but only if we get very stable
> > results from this.
> >
> > Bug: skia:7378
> > Change-Id: I057513a691093e7f73c0f5790e17fab1a5ec0bc4
> > Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84820
> > Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
> > Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
>
> TBR=borenet@google.com,mtklein@google.com,kjlubick@google.com
>
> Change-Id: I23c37a6bde631e95f0b4ae7277ec8fcf325a00e9
> Bug: skia:7378
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84921
> Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
No-Tree-Checks: true
Change-Id: Ie7f0a3dc6ba55c124c796aba16a0f0497f285f3a
Bug: skia:7378
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84865
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Change-Id: I7baae5f90b2e510b66443cda449071c7c6ec9ec7
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/83520
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Perf was nice and flat after https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/83240
but there was a 4-5x slowdown on the benchmarks themselves,
indicating that perhaps we were running nanobench on the
LITTLE cores (now on powersave) instead of the big cores we
thought (which were recently scaled down).
This experiment will show us FOR CERTAIN that we are
running on core 0 or 1 which is at .6 max frequency.
We expect to see a speedup from the previous results.
This is leading to turning of CPUs we don't need
to make sure nanobench is running on the ones we expect.
Bug: skia:
NOTRY=true
Change-Id: Ida65181e4d90e778e65e3f22d761288b9ade64f6
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84201
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
This scaling logic correctly accounts for some devices
which have multiple CPUs. Previously, we were scaling
the smaller of these CPUs, which likely had a negative
impact on nanobench, given nanobench was single threaded
and the CPUs weren't allowed to idle much (because we
set the CPU).
This CL sets those additional CPUs to powersave when we run
nanobench and then correctly scales down the beefier
CPU we want to run nanobench on.
For DM, we just run it in ondemand mode, which will
hopefully be "as fast as possible", but allow the CPU
governor to scale down if overheating becomes a problem.
Bug: skia:7378
notry=TRUE
Change-Id: I45ca5d9fb32182233d1b2d094842c879f2b84da4
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/83240
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Bug: skia:7381
Change-Id: I2dd5443c81cd895eb1d68b0cd90221a7e2e07d46
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/80843
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
It throttles 1000x more than intended, and I suspect that some of the
trip points it uses to decide when to throttle make no sense. We've
already turned it off on the Nexus 5x.
Change-Id: Idf556a83fe61ccc5f63c7bede3eecbe80087e28b
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/81303
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
It's causing a lot of sleep for being too hot. ThermalManager assumes
the trip points are static, when in fact, they are dynamic.
Bug: skia:7378
NOTRY=true
Change-Id: I907a42986831b7072a03a0423afd5a36bb2dfa74
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/80981
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
The new check was a different config while we fixed the errors. Most
errors are now fixed, and merging these will help with running both on
the CQ.
No-Try: true
Change-Id: I5804ecea84a8dbbaacf6a4ea96e2af9505641d49
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/79323
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
IntelIris640 is 100% identical to IntelIris540 on Gold.
No-Try: true
Change-Id: I0e5342b182267a7d6ee510329b7c8ab7cb3a479e
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/78640
Reviewed-by: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Some bots, especially the Nexus 7s, seemed to occasionally
fail when setting the CPU frequency. I was unable to
repro this behavior, so this is a shotgun approach.
We add a 5 second delay between setting and checking,
checking frequency using scaling_cur_freq instead of
scaling_setspeed, set the min_freq as well as max_freq,
and retry up to 3 times if setting cpu frequency fails.
NOTRY=true
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: Id4d85d8d509c9dba8e3a0e06b5992f5adadf36d2
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/78140
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
This reverts commit 373588426b.
Reason for revert: Have enough digests on Gold now.
Original change's description:
> Temporarily add Ubuntu IntelHD4400 jobs.
>
> I want to compare this with the IntelBayTrail and if the results are
> similar, replace those bots.
>
> No-Try: true
> Change-Id: Ib5476fe91dc446182cd1b37e93fe17962dcf961a
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/76900
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
TBR=benjaminwagner@google.com,kjlubick@google.com
Change-Id: Ica07d1ee635e59e3d3da51ee73591ffe08310e34
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/77860
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
I want to compare this with the IntelBayTrail and if the results are
similar, replace those bots.
No-Try: true
Change-Id: Ib5476fe91dc446182cd1b37e93fe17962dcf961a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/76900
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
This also makes *sure* the CPU frequency we set the
device to actually "takes". Along the way, I learned
if scaling_max_freq is < the frequency we set, the
scaling_max_freq will be used instead, which was
happening to the PixelCs and AndroidOnes.
As a result, this may make those two Test- configs faster.
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I10c98d37e296a19e1cf67bfe7269bb59cdd912d5
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/74360
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I994f67c3043306d7fa612feb03f8fbe8d7bf4c91
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/73760
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Bug: skia:7305
Change-Id: Ifb270cba27daaef75d3930f990e19215a251ca28
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/71921
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
The test takes so long that the bot times out.
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I77e7b192a1df1f422e61f09a931b7576fa55fbde
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/68440
Commit-Queue: Chris Dalton <csmartdalton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Bug: skia:
NOTRY=true
Change-Id: I500eae85ec334dc7121266ebd2f41dc526ec4695
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/66880
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
The first "sharding" technique we will try is just by test config
(e.g. 8888, gles, etc). Thus, for backwards compatibility,
the default "shard" is All, as in all configs
Bug: skia:
NOTRY=true
Change-Id: Ia02362477a5d97f8f74d688b5f0c4f45fc129375
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/59563
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
The newer adb acts more like cp when pulling. We used to
create the dm folder on the host machine before pulling.
This used to be fine,
/device/dm_out/dm.json -> /host/dm/dm.json
However, with the update, adb would do
/device/dm_out/dm.json -> /host/dm/dm_out/dm.json
This breaks the upload step. To make this transition
a smooth one, /usr/bin/adb on the RPI is staying the same
(for a while, at least) and /usr/bin/adb.1.0.35 is being added.
That way we can use the new adb on tests after this commit, but
when we backfill, we don't break because of the unexpected folder.
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: Icbed38594fca0e17af1f8d01d75c42ce03f710b9
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/58880
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
I'm hoping that recent fixes to timing logic will prevent these problems.
Bug: skia:6534
Change-Id: Ia735e91887164c7a4882d5d3dd67df8c6115bfe9
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/54660
Reviewed-by: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
NUC6i7KYK with GTX960 is an experimental eGPU setup that will be
replaced with the NUC7i5BNK.
IntelHD4600 has been replaced with IntelHD4400.
Move remainder of *AbandonGpuContext jobs to QuadroP400.
No-Try: true
Change-Id: Ic81392ec162cb88500c9da7609471dbdc4a64f84
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/57320
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Perf numbers track closely with IntelIris540, although Perf numbers from
SurfacePro2017 are more noisy.
No-Try: true
Change-Id: I9dfefd6daf69644a1c0850453334876269cd7942
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/56540
Reviewed-by: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
No-Try: true
Change-Id: Ie255d46ff50d13d25d045791c1c3066f06ab9243
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/53601
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
No-Try: true
Change-Id: I449c0fd435b233e9c9538c17295ef18348380658
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/53120
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Change-Id: If3532bcb5bef5fad8c950d6844135ad3597d2674
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/51380
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Explicitly disable it on PixelC. This is arbitrary, so we continue to
get coverage of the single-threaded code.
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I0ac91f7ca58652933db452720f353068cf2d0f2d
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/50000
Reviewed-by: Robert Phillips <robertphillips@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Bug: skia:4632
No-Try: true
Change-Id: I85a0b23037d5885e5d762788d8bf5b7cc6fc19b2
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/45980
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
