Of note, the perf results reported are not directly
comparable CPU->GPU because the GPU ones are likely
emulated (no real gpu in the Docker container on an
GCE VM).
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I52259085f4d9e22c45b67f3e8ce1211a5c6c6d3e
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/163126
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Also make a CPU only and GPU only build (although
the latter still has a lot of CPU logic).
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I857c2300021c2adb5344865c28e4ad3e8d332954
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/162022
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
We have a similar ingestion strategy to Gold.
I tried to use something off the shelf like benchmark.js
but passing the PathKit context into the benchmarks was
non-trivial. Plus, making a basic benchmarking tool
ended up being not too hard.
We should be able to re-use the docker container/aggregator
for CanvasKit too.
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I613dfc58ea57c31cf71566a8ac55f8df9272ad25
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/161620
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Joe Gregorio <jcgregorio@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Altmueller <stephana@google.com>
