SkSL errors now identify the specific range of code they are describing,
rather than just the line number.
Change-Id: Ifabb3148476f9b4cd8e532f23e5b38e1cf33a87e
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/528039
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
These are wrapped in an unscoped Block. Previously, we didn't assign any
position to the block, so it was implicitly given the position of its
enclosing statement.
Change-Id: Id320eb1db583acd6ae42deba2fbb0b61033c3936
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/522922
Reviewed-by: Arman Uguray <armansito@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Change-Id: Id894eb70273454716eb33c85dff2056333e90cdd
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/445281
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
In GLSL and SkSL, control statements don't require explicit braces
around single-statement children. That is, the `match = true` child
statement here doesn't need to be braced.
if (condition) match = true;
Because there are no braces, we never create a Block or a dedicated
SymbolTable here. This is normally not a problem, but the fuzzer
discovered that it can dump things into the symbol table inside a child
statement:
if (condition) int newSymbol;
This becomes problematic because the symbol name now outlives its block.
This means `newSymbol` can be referred to later, which should be illegal
(and can cause the optimizer to blow up since the structure is bogus).
There doesn't seem to be any reason to allow this code to compile; the
user can add an explicit scope here to make it reasonable, and it's
(almost) meaningless to declare a symbol that's instantly going to fall
out of scope. This code is now rejected with an error message.
Change-Id: I44778e5b59652d345b10eecd4c88efbf7d86a5e0
Bug: oss-fuzz:29849
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/358960
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
