SPIR-V would previously jump to the top of the do-while loop when
encountering a `continue`. This is not correct; it should jump to the
loop-exit test. We don't have any real shaders which test this case, and
it can't be checked from inside Runtime Effects since do-while is not
part of ES2.
Change-Id: Iac58e9e7ad0a94640e6418afea096b19ba50a2df
Bug: skia:11874
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/397576
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This reverts commit 7bba1f55e8.
Change-Id: I707a3c215f37376086e22eaa43916afeed6da4c7
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/388456
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
This reverts commit a9c187e5cc.
Change-Id: Icbfb8abdfc67fc2e6428d97a6cdede2726fb56e4
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/385596
Auto-Submit: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This reverts commit 9e476b798f.
Reason for revert: Angry Vulkan bots
Original change's description:
> Refactored SPIR-V RelaxedPrecision handling
>
> The RelaxedPrecision decoration is now handled by nextId(), to make it
> easier to see all spots where a RelaxedPrecision decoration might be
> necessary. The goal of this initial refactor is not to actually fix the
> issues with RelaxedPrecision decorations, but rather to lay the
> groundwork for doing so in followup CLs.
>
> The initial intent of this change was to not affect the SPIR-V at all,
> saving modifications for followups, but there ended up being three kinds
> of changes to the output:
>
> 1. Doing things at nextId() time rather than later means some
> decorations move to an earlier spot in the output. This results in
> diffs, but should not cause any behavioral changes.
> 2. We were incorrectly tagging bools as RelaxedPrecision in some
> situations. By funneling things through fewer code paths, the refactor
> would have caused this to happen in even more situations, and the code
> responsible for the bug was being rewritten in this CL anyway, so it
> seemed worth just fixing the issue as part of this change.
> 3. Funneling things through fewer code paths ended up adding
> (correct) RelaxedPrecision modifiers to binary operations that had
> previously been missing them. It seemed better to just let it happen
> than to try to maintain bug-for-bug compatibility with the previous
> approach.
>
> Change-Id: Ia9654d6b5754e2c797e02226660cb618c9189b36
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384318
> Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
TBR=brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com
Change-Id: I9ada728e5fd5798bc1179640560c2e6045b7efd1
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/385158
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
The RelaxedPrecision decoration is now handled by nextId(), to make it
easier to see all spots where a RelaxedPrecision decoration might be
necessary. The goal of this initial refactor is not to actually fix the
issues with RelaxedPrecision decorations, but rather to lay the
groundwork for doing so in followup CLs.
The initial intent of this change was to not affect the SPIR-V at all,
saving modifications for followups, but there ended up being three kinds
of changes to the output:
1. Doing things at nextId() time rather than later means some
decorations move to an earlier spot in the output. This results in
diffs, but should not cause any behavioral changes.
2. We were incorrectly tagging bools as RelaxedPrecision in some
situations. By funneling things through fewer code paths, the refactor
would have caused this to happen in even more situations, and the code
responsible for the bug was being rewritten in this CL anyway, so it
seemed worth just fixing the issue as part of this change.
3. Funneling things through fewer code paths ended up adding
(correct) RelaxedPrecision modifiers to binary operations that had
previously been missing them. It seemed better to just let it happen
than to try to maintain bug-for-bug compatibility with the previous
approach.
Change-Id: Ia9654d6b5754e2c797e02226660cb618c9189b36
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384318
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
This will allow us to load these inputs for unit testing in `dm`.
Change-Id: Id256ba7c30d3ec94b98048e47af44cf9efe580d5
Bug: skia:11009
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/357282
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
