This fix is a tradeoff. It changes intersection to
treat a case where one coincident run is intersected at one point
and the other edge is not as continuing to be a span.
The old code tried to treat this as a single point.
The old code is probably right, but this change alone
made the data structures inconsistent. Later, extending
the coincident runs would fail by incorrectly discarding
the single point intersection.
As a result, this fixes the security test and one other, but
makes a different test fail. Isolating the failure uncovered
a reduced case that fails with and without the change, so
there are more serious problems here. Those problems are
addressed in a separate CL.
Many of the test edits below remove ill-thought out debugging
messaging that fire off global state, which isn't usable
in a multi-threaded test environment.
In the end, with this fix, all existing tests (modulo one
new failure and one new non-failure) pass in debug and
in the extended release test suites.
TBR=reed@google.com
BUG=614248
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2018513003
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2018513003
Confirm that no path ops tests are flaky, and clean up errors around
that. The test framework was incorrectly checking for >= MAX_ERRORS for
failure and <= MAX_ERRORS for success.
TBR=reed@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1140563003
Extended tests (150M+) run to completion in release in about 6 minutes; the standard test suite exceeds 100K and finishes in a few seconds on desktops.
TBR=reed
BUG=skia:3588
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1037953004
Replace the implicit curve intersection with a geometric curve intersection. The implicit intersection proved mathematically unstable and took a long time to zero in on an answer.
Use pointers instead of indices to refer to parts of curves. Indices required awkward renumbering.
Unify t and point values so that small intervals can be eliminated in one pass.
Break cubics up front to eliminate loops and cusps.
Make the Simplify and Op code more regular and eliminate arbitrary differences.
Add a builder that takes an array of paths and operators.
Delete unused code.
BUG=skia:3588
R=reed@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1037573004
SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
instance, not the whole thread pool.
This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
for CPU .skp rendering.
Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
with all other tests now.
This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
from DM, which we don't use.
On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.
BUG=skia:
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9c7207b5dc71dc5a96a2eb107d401133333d5b6fR=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/531653002
Reason for revert:
Leaks, leaks, leaks.
Original issue's description:
> SkThreadPool ~~> SkTaskGroup
>
> SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
> one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
> and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
> instance, not the whole thread pool.
>
> This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
> tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
> quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
> to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
> to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
> places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
> for CPU .skp rendering.
>
> Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
> can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
> to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
> with all other tests now.
>
> This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
> from DM, which we don't use.
>
> On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
> Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
> show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
> minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.
>
> BUG=skia:
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9c7207b5dc71dc5a96a2eb107d401133333d5b6fR=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, reed@google.com, mtklein@chromium.orgTBR=bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, caryclark@google.com, mtklein@chromium.org, reed@google.com
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Author: mtklein@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/533393002
SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
instance, not the whole thread pool.
This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
for CPU .skp rendering.
Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
with all other tests now.
This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
from DM, which we don't use.
On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.
BUG=skia:
R=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/531653002
