C++ algorithms have largely standardized on a [begin, end) half-open
range, as seen in standard library containers. SkTQSort now adheres to
this model, and takes vec.begin() and vec.end() as its inputs.
To avoid confusion between inclusive and half-open ranges inside the
implementation, internal helper functions now take "left" and "count"
arguments instead of "left"/"right" or "begin"/"end". This avoids any
ambiguity.
(Although performance was not the main goal, this CL appears to
slightly improve our sorting benchmark on my machine.)
Change-Id: I5e96b6730be96cf23d001ee0915c69764b2c024a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/302579
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This reverts commit 70474c1cb0.
Reason for revert: bot build failure
Original change's description:
> Remove custom SkSort algorithms.
>
> SortBench shows that SkTQSort and SkTHeapSort are inferior to std::sort.
> The difference is small on randomized inputs, but quite significant for
> semi-ordered inputs (forward/backward/repeated). There doesn't seem to
> to be any compelling advantage to SkTQSort.
>
> Nanobench results: https://screenshot.googleplex.com/9JOLV1d6Z0u
>
> (These performance numbers are from an optimized build my local machine;
> it's possible that we might see different results on the test bots.)
>
> Change-Id: Iaf19563041547eae7de2953be249129108f093b1
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/302295
> Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
TBR=mtklein@google.com,brianosman@google.com,johnstiles@google.com
Change-Id: I1126dd4cda95716dac225ad32d5b0e5cf3f09421
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/302447
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
SortBench shows that SkTQSort and SkTHeapSort are inferior to std::sort.
The difference is small on randomized inputs, but quite significant for
semi-ordered inputs (forward/backward/repeated). There doesn't seem to
to be any compelling advantage to SkTQSort.
Nanobench results: https://screenshot.googleplex.com/9JOLV1d6Z0u
(These performance numbers are from an optimized build my local machine;
it's possible that we might see different results on the test bots.)
Change-Id: Iaf19563041547eae7de2953be249129108f093b1
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/302295
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Use std::min and std::max everywhere.
SkTPin still exists. We can't use std::clamp yet, and even when
we can, it has undefined behavior with NaN. SkTPin is written
to ensure that we return a value in the [lo, hi] range.
Change-Id: I506852a36e024ae405358d5078a872e2c77fa71e
Docs-Preview: https://skia.org/?cl=269357
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/269357
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
Current strategy: everything from the top
Things to look at first are the manual changes:
- added tools/rewrite_includes.py
- removed -Idirectives from BUILD.gn
- various compile.sh simplifications
- tweak tools/embed_resources.py
- update gn/find_headers.py to write paths from the top
- update gn/gn_to_bp.py SkUserConfig.h layout
so that #include "include/config/SkUserConfig.h" always
gets the header we want.
No-Presubmit: true
Change-Id: I73a4b181654e0e38d229bc456c0d0854bae3363e
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/209706
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hal Canary <halcanary@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Florin Malita <fmalita@chromium.org>
sk_tool_utils doesn't really fit the naming convention
the rest of code under tools/ tends to use.
Change-Id: I45326a174101c6eb4b6149e9c742f658f2fd23b1
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/202313
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
In order to solve both the VRAM budget for explicit resource allocation and DDL incremental flush problems we will need to always have the opLists be sorted.
This will also help partial flushes.
Change-Id: I3ac2baf622415925ab5c403b7800f3fc49e59838
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/144000
Commit-Queue: Robert Phillips <robertphillips@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Daniel <egdaniel@google.com>
