sk_tool_utils doesn't really fit the naming convention
the rest of code under tools/ tends to use.
Change-Id: I45326a174101c6eb4b6149e9c742f658f2fd23b1
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/202313
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Bug: skia:8773
Change-Id: I82b1f22f300eadc93f79a35a1638b7eb6376169a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/193031
Commit-Queue: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Rather that returning nullptr for a recording
canvas, return a raster canvas instead.
R=reed@google.com,robertphillips@google.com
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I211d8ef368b9aec6d14cc72d1652ac6a03f3fa7b
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/151666
Commit-Queue: Cary Clark <caryclark@skia.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Phillips <robertphillips@google.com>
Adapting gray to 565 will add a noticeable purple/green tint.
I'd rather only the 565 images in Gold were tainted with that.
Change-Id: Ib09e92b2f78c6de086345124e9eefeb31bbb5fa8
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/147422
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Gaussian blur filter will interpolate value by using out of bounds
coords, which is 0. This makes it appears darker near the bounds in the
blurred images. There are two issues: 1) when downsampling and
upsampling, we should use GrTextureDomainEffect kClamp_Mode to clamp
the texture coords to the bounds; 2) during Gaussian blur, we need to
clamp to texture bounds.
BUG=622128
TEST=cc_unittests, GM image test & manual. Some test results can be found at:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=622128#c49
Change-Id: I9283da1d91efb0da94a991f2d372e9f62c288bdc
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/20465
Commit-Queue: Robert Phillips <robertphillips@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen White <senorblanco@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Phillips <robertphillips@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
