Without this change, SKP tests *appeared* to fail because the actuals reported
their checksumValues as integers, while the expectations recorded their
checksumValues as strings.
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
R=stephana@google.com
TBR=stephana
(SkipBuildbotRuns)
Author: epoger@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/489023003
This will allow developers to maintain SKP baselines without ever running their
own rebaseline_server instance!
For now, the developer must manually apply the resulting patchset to his local
Skia checkout to actually modify expectations; in the near future, we hope to
make the UI upload the patchset to Rietveld on the user's behalf.
BUG=skia:1918
NOTRY=true
R=stephana@google.com, rmistry@google.com
Author: epoger@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/487853004
This is needed for rebaselining using the shared rebaseline_server instance:
by telling the client which git revision was used to fetch expectations, we
allow the client to pass that back along with new baselines (so the server
knows which revision to patch).
This is also handy in that it allows the server to tell the client more about the
different result sets (which files they were generated from).
BUG=skia:1918
NOTRY=true
R=rmistry@google.com
Author: epoger@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/474813002
This will allow the buildbots to warn the production rebaseline_server: "I just
generated some new results; here's a comparison that a human might ask for
soon. Download whatever images and generate whatever diffs you would need to
provide those results."
BUG=skia:1942
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
R=rmistry@google.com
Author: epoger@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/443013002
This is a step towards providing SKP comparisons against expectations, not just
other actual results... we still need to allow the user to select
JSONKEY_EXPECTEDRESULTS vs JSONKEY_ACTUALRESULTS within the summary
files found.
BUG=skia:1942
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
R=rmistry@google.com
Author: epoger@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/442203002
