`void` behaves differently from opaque types in several situations, such
as function return types, and errors involving `void` should not call it
an opaque type. I've fixed all the places where we relied on `isOpaque`
to return catch void types.
Change-Id: I359c00f836be6e56cb0373beff60cf2ff830f77b
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/472451
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Mysteriously, I had written a test which put arrays of void inside a
struct, but had neglected to include the non-array case. It causes an
okay-not-great error (referring to void as an "opaque type").
Change-Id: Id20a9d3512d29aecea81d46877dce708b7b2f973
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/472450
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
