Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ethan Nicholas
8f352ce20c Revert "Revert "Refactored SPIR-V RelaxedPrecision handling""
This reverts commit a9c187e5cc.

Change-Id: Icbfb8abdfc67fc2e6428d97a6cdede2726fb56e4
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/385596
Auto-Submit: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-03-18 15:01:15 +00:00
John Stiles
2654187396 Eliminate unused local variables during SkSL optimization.
This can eliminate const variables which have been completely folded
away, unnecessary synthetic variables created during codegen/inlining,
or code that simply didn't need to exist at all.

Change-Id: I37a65e455e6527a6a6c2f4dde918f48d84dc2638
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/383496
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
2021-03-16 17:22:53 +00:00
John Stiles
132cfdd49d Revert "Inline functions of the form 'return (expr)' only."
This reverts commit 92748af1a5.

Reason for revert: SkSLCommaSideEffects_GPU crashing on Android

Original change's description:
> Inline functions of the form 'return (expr)' only.
>
> This drastically reduces the number of functions which we allow to be
> inlined. If this change does not hurt our performance, it will allow us
> to trivially remove hundreds of LOC. All current data leads us to
> believe that it may affect the Mali 400 but is highly unlikely to change
> results on any other device in the tree.
>
> More info: http://go/optimization-in-sksl-inliner
>
> Change-Id: Ia6b706742ce5407453e0e697b6c1f9201084c0e8
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384858
> Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>

TBR=brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com

Change-Id: I6a670dacaa58fe3386ff50375ac6d1cac4fd7f2c
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/385161
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-03-15 22:08:48 +00:00
Ethan Nicholas
a9c187e5cc Revert "Refactored SPIR-V RelaxedPrecision handling"
This reverts commit 9e476b798f.

Reason for revert: Angry Vulkan bots

Original change's description:
> Refactored SPIR-V RelaxedPrecision handling
>
> The RelaxedPrecision decoration is now handled by nextId(), to make it
> easier to see all spots where a RelaxedPrecision decoration might be
> necessary. The goal of this initial refactor is not to actually fix the
> issues with RelaxedPrecision decorations, but rather to lay the
> groundwork for doing so in followup CLs.
>
> The initial intent of this change was to not affect the SPIR-V at all,
> saving modifications for followups, but there ended up being three kinds
> of changes to the output:
>
> 1. Doing things at nextId() time rather than later means some
> decorations move to an earlier spot in the output. This results in
> diffs, but should not cause any behavioral changes.
> 2. We were incorrectly tagging bools as RelaxedPrecision in some
> situations. By funneling things through fewer code paths, the refactor
> would have caused this to happen in even more situations, and the code
> responsible for the bug was being rewritten in this CL anyway, so it
> seemed worth just fixing the issue as part of this change.
> 3. Funneling things through fewer code paths ended up adding
> (correct) RelaxedPrecision modifiers to binary operations that had
> previously been missing them. It seemed better to just let it happen
> than to try to maintain bug-for-bug compatibility with the previous
> approach.
>
> Change-Id: Ia9654d6b5754e2c797e02226660cb618c9189b36
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384318
> Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>

TBR=brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com

Change-Id: I9ada728e5fd5798bc1179640560c2e6045b7efd1
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/385158
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
2021-03-15 21:24:47 +00:00
Ethan Nicholas
9e476b798f Refactored SPIR-V RelaxedPrecision handling
The RelaxedPrecision decoration is now handled by nextId(), to make it
easier to see all spots where a RelaxedPrecision decoration might be
necessary. The goal of this initial refactor is not to actually fix the
issues with RelaxedPrecision decorations, but rather to lay the
groundwork for doing so in followup CLs.

The initial intent of this change was to not affect the SPIR-V at all,
saving modifications for followups, but there ended up being three kinds
of changes to the output:

1. Doing things at nextId() time rather than later means some
decorations move to an earlier spot in the output. This results in
diffs, but should not cause any behavioral changes.
2. We were incorrectly tagging bools as RelaxedPrecision in some
situations. By funneling things through fewer code paths, the refactor
would have caused this to happen in even more situations, and the code
responsible for the bug was being rewritten in this CL anyway, so it
seemed worth just fixing the issue as part of this change.
3. Funneling things through fewer code paths ended up adding
(correct) RelaxedPrecision modifiers to binary operations that had
previously been missing them. It seemed better to just let it happen
than to try to maintain bug-for-bug compatibility with the previous
approach.

Change-Id: Ia9654d6b5754e2c797e02226660cb618c9189b36
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384318
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
2021-03-15 20:45:26 +00:00
John Stiles
92748af1a5 Inline functions of the form 'return (expr)' only.
This drastically reduces the number of functions which we allow to be
inlined. If this change does not hurt our performance, it will allow us
to trivially remove hundreds of LOC. All current data leads us to
believe that it may affect the Mali 400 but is highly unlikely to change
results on any other device in the tree.

More info: http://go/optimization-in-sksl-inliner

Change-Id: Ia6b706742ce5407453e0e697b6c1f9201084c0e8
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384858
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
2021-03-15 19:46:46 +00:00
John Stiles
7a3f5506b6 Performance experiment: disable control-flow analysis.
This CL will be used to test for potential performance regressions (or
improvements) that we might cause by disabling this optimization pass.

It will be reverted in ~1 day.

Change-Id: I26b7687c341eb6d81231406381c39869cfccf6d6
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/381259
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
2021-03-08 19:41:19 +00:00
John Stiles
03467a53e6 Revert "Disable control-flow analysis in SkSL. (Performance experiment)"
This reverts commit 50b1b2b90d.

Reason for revert: ending experiment

Original change's description:
> Disable control-flow analysis in SkSL. (Performance experiment)
>
> This CL will be used to test for potential performance regressions (or
> improvements?) that we might incur by disabling this optimization pass.
>
> It will be reverted in ~1 day.
>
> Change-Id: I775cdb0c95df81fa25ebbd66e4ff01f64c660f68
> Bug: skia:11319
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/378456
> Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>

TBR=brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com

Change-Id: Ie385a82db237ff5651348d82b9651f8ba09375b9
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: skia:11319
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/379581
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-03-04 15:20:09 +00:00
John Stiles
50b1b2b90d Disable control-flow analysis in SkSL. (Performance experiment)
This CL will be used to test for potential performance regressions (or
improvements?) that we might incur by disabling this optimization pass.

It will be reverted in ~1 day.

Change-Id: I775cdb0c95df81fa25ebbd66e4ff01f64c660f68
Bug: skia:11319
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/378456
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
2021-03-03 22:08:56 +00:00
John Stiles
bfc9be0f77 Migrate SkSL test inputs to the resources/ directory.
This will allow us to load these inputs for unit testing in `dm`.

Change-Id: Id256ba7c30d3ec94b98048e47af44cf9efe580d5
Bug: skia:11009
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/357282
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
2021-01-22 18:57:29 +00:00