Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
caryclark
54359294a7 cumulative pathops patch
Replace the implicit curve intersection with a geometric curve intersection. The implicit intersection proved mathematically unstable and took a long time to zero in on an answer.

Use pointers instead of indices to refer to parts of curves. Indices required awkward renumbering.

Unify t and point values so that small intervals can be eliminated in one pass.

Break cubics up front to eliminate loops and cusps.

Make the Simplify and Op code more regular and eliminate arbitrary differences.

Add a builder that takes an array of paths and operators.

Delete unused code.

BUG=skia:3588
R=reed@google.com

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1037573004
2015-03-26 07:52:43 -07:00
reed
0dc4dd6dda Revert of pathops version two (patchset #16 id:150001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1002693002/)
Reason for revert:
ASAN investigation

Original issue's description:
> pathops version two
>
> R=reed@google.com
>
> marked 'no commit' to attempt to get trybots to run
>
> TBR=reed@google.com
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/ccec0f958ffc71a9986d236bc2eb335cb2111119

TBR=caryclark@google.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1029993002
2015-03-24 13:55:33 -07:00
caryclark
ccec0f958f pathops version two
R=reed@google.com

marked 'no commit' to attempt to get trybots to run

TBR=reed@google.com

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1002693002
2015-03-24 07:28:17 -07:00
mtklein
406654be7a SkThreadPool ~~> SkTaskGroup
SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
one global pool.  Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
instance, not the whole thread pool.

This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
quilt).  We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
to complete.  This should be more efficient, and allow us
to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
places.  E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
for CPU .skp rendering.

Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
to control threading.  They'll just ride on the global pool
with all other tests now.

This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
from DM, which we don't use.

On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s).  The bots
show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.

BUG=skia:

Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9c7207b5dc71dc5a96a2eb107d401133333d5b6f

R=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/531653002
2014-09-03 15:34:37 -07:00
mtklein
2460bbdfbb Revert of SkThreadPool ~~> SkTaskGroup (patchset #4 id:60001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/531653002/)
Reason for revert:
Leaks, leaks, leaks.

Original issue's description:
> SkThreadPool ~~> SkTaskGroup
>
> SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
> one global pool.  Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
> and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
> instance, not the whole thread pool.
>
> This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
> tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
> quilt).  We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
> to complete.  This should be more efficient, and allow us
> to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
> places.  E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
> for CPU .skp rendering.
>
> Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
> can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
> to control threading.  They'll just ride on the global pool
> with all other tests now.
>
> This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
> from DM, which we don't use.
>
> On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
> Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s).  The bots
> show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
> minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.
>
> BUG=skia:
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9c7207b5dc71dc5a96a2eb107d401133333d5b6f

R=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, reed@google.com, mtklein@chromium.org
TBR=bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, caryclark@google.com, mtklein@chromium.org, reed@google.com
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:

Author: mtklein@google.com

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/533393002
2014-09-03 14:17:48 -07:00
mtklein
9c7207b5dc SkThreadPool ~~> SkTaskGroup
SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
one global pool.  Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
instance, not the whole thread pool.

This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
quilt).  We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
to complete.  This should be more efficient, and allow us
to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
places.  E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
for CPU .skp rendering.

Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
to control threading.  They'll just ride on the global pool
with all other tests now.

This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
from DM, which we don't use.

On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s).  The bots
show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.

BUG=skia:
R=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/531653002
2014-09-03 14:06:48 -07:00
caryclark
a8d2ffb1c2 add pathops tight bounds; conform path ops' gyp to unit tests
Implement path tight bounds using path ops machinery. This is not
as efficient as it could be; for instance, internally, it creates
a path ops structure more suited to intersection. If this shows
up as a performance bottleneck, it could be improved.

Fix path ops gyp files, which have fallen out of sync with other
tests.

R=mtklein@google.com, bsalomon@google.com
TBR=mtklein
BUG=skia:1712

Author: caryclark@google.com

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/348343002
2014-06-24 07:55:12 -07:00