Bug: skia:
Change-Id: If1fc0854a42407fa6acd8d333ef49ae0b6302a81
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/95640
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Also a few more blacklists to avoid shader compilation errors
in the Debug-GPU configuration.
Bug: skia:7166
Bug: skia:6687
Change-Id: I07b5adfc62e8029ece21406f0b79b32d9adf346f
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/95560
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Bug: skia:7166
Change-Id: Iefc8c6c1b72805dfe3ec8bd06d6ba6a878307582
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/93620
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
It should work on 32 and 64 bit android running M or newer.
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I7e6d4000f4fee8f2704b84b7174174dd0e68d21c
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/93700
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
This may fix weird races in tests.
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I41c36424c7b559301e915a0892590c74931ae463
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/93942
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I7394d2f392d7179777b65e77194436271efea80d
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/93760
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Daniel <egdaniel@google.com>
We do some of this already in skpbench.
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: Ia698466e83f9b476644c126747a2f89346361d13
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/93561
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
- fill in a couple switches to allow software to rasterize gray8
- add a gray8 config to DM so we can test it
- enable this config on some bots
Today we draw gray8 using SkRasterPipeline, loading it as {g,g,g,1}
and storing using the same fixed luma math as SkLumaColorFilter.
One day it'd be nice to use the color space's luma vector if present.
Can we support this on GPU?
Change-Id: I4ee661c8bd5f33f5db2433ffb6e1bc2483af8397
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/92681
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Bug: skia:7463
Change-Id: I5dd17a5ba33f867346837f006f9dc4cb775cfa04
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/91960
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
Bug: skia:7344
Change-Id: I019fe5e3178d13ccf3a510bdcf1c81915149def5
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/89900
Commit-Queue: Yuqian Li <liyuqian@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Bug: skia:7344
Change-Id: I458afe4abe5edff8b8ccbd5abdaf4ebbf892ee00
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/90245
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
This is a followup to https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/90343,
which causes task durations to increase due to copying over images, skps,
etc. on every run.
Bug: skia:7408
Change-Id: I42e829e287b7343e969159ac19c587a87ebe99e8
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/90942
Reviewed-by: Stephan Altmueller <stephana@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I42c528d86f19d369609b26763334e055501a9b9b
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/90880
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Bug: skia:2679
Change-Id: Ia462af01b9832da90206b9e9be2278cb48c6c502
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/86401
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Context: Email to skiabot@ from mcgreevy@
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: Ic3bc19600809bde5adcd9edd23ba4d8b126ec852
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/88540
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
These were removed in
https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/78640
However, we've now decided on the 640 rather than the 540 due to
inventory.
No-Try: true
Change-Id: Icf6db636287e151d3dd3ac74cfddf8f6bd3bea6a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/87202
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
This reverts commit de71572f65.
Revert "Revert "Transform vertices for distance field glyphs on CPU.""
This reverts commit f226e66d75.
Change-Id: I2545afae3beb1d6b14bba056853ed826ae7a4679
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/86603
Reviewed-by: Greg Daniel <egdaniel@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
Bug: skia:7409
Change-Id: I6c9d86af147f5234a0484e43e053ce1758cb312d
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/85400
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
This will make it easier to transition to new cert.
Bug: skia:7408
Change-Id: I9263851233f492c5e62155b61541783aa86ba634
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/85006
Reviewed-by: Stephan Altmueller <stephana@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Bug: skia:7409
Change-Id: Ic86696880858b9744bf9cea86caa3564c1a5e5af
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/85003
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Add a job that doesn't allow fallback so we know when things aren't
working as expected.
Change-Id: If993976d6807635bde455c2091f8a1ba18c41e27
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/83700
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
No-Try: true
Change-Id: I229c2839d423d543ea7bd1aedec893d7bfeb27ea
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/83701
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
This reverts commit 43307c09b9.
Reason for revert: Fixed this time. Echo 1 > already online cpu
returns exit code 1, which makes python over-react.
Original change's description:
> Revert "Disable extra CPUs during Nanobench"
>
> This reverts commit 32af335e7a.
>
> Reason for revert: many unhappy android bots
>
> Original change's description:
> > Disable extra CPUs during Nanobench
> >
> > The previous experiment revealed that nanobench can
> > run on any of the online CPUs, so rather than put
> > the ones we don't need/want into powersave mode, just
> > disable them.
> >
> > Maybe in the future we can run CPU tests on the big
> > or LITTLE cpus to get perf data on higher end or
> > lower end cpus, but only if we get very stable
> > results from this.
> >
> > Bug: skia:7378
> > Change-Id: I057513a691093e7f73c0f5790e17fab1a5ec0bc4
> > Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84820
> > Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
> > Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
>
> TBR=borenet@google.com,mtklein@google.com,kjlubick@google.com
>
> Change-Id: I23c37a6bde631e95f0b4ae7277ec8fcf325a00e9
> Bug: skia:7378
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84921
> Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
No-Tree-Checks: true
Change-Id: Ie7f0a3dc6ba55c124c796aba16a0f0497f285f3a
Bug: skia:7378
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84865
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
This reverts commit 32af335e7a.
Reason for revert: many unhappy android bots
Original change's description:
> Disable extra CPUs during Nanobench
>
> The previous experiment revealed that nanobench can
> run on any of the online CPUs, so rather than put
> the ones we don't need/want into powersave mode, just
> disable them.
>
> Maybe in the future we can run CPU tests on the big
> or LITTLE cpus to get perf data on higher end or
> lower end cpus, but only if we get very stable
> results from this.
>
> Bug: skia:7378
> notry=true
> notreechecks=true
> Change-Id: I057513a691093e7f73c0f5790e17fab1a5ec0bc4
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84820
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
TBR=borenet@google.com,mtklein@google.com,kjlubick@google.com
Change-Id: I23c37a6bde631e95f0b4ae7277ec8fcf325a00e9
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: skia:7378
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84921
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
The previous experiment revealed that nanobench can
run on any of the online CPUs, so rather than put
the ones we don't need/want into powersave mode, just
disable them.
Maybe in the future we can run CPU tests on the big
or LITTLE cpus to get perf data on higher end or
lower end cpus, but only if we get very stable
results from this.
Bug: skia:7378
notry=true
notreechecks=true
Change-Id: I057513a691093e7f73c0f5790e17fab1a5ec0bc4
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84820
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Change-Id: I26e75cf6cd865ec6c47b7766679177bfd30387da
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/82921
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
We no longer have any reason to suspect there's anything wrong with
these configurations, and we're not actively debugging anything
related to them anymore.
I've kept the normal Debug/Release bots.
Change-Id: I1a3d8087b519d6f01223d3b33bce762511056d1a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84522
Reviewed-by: Yuqian Li <liyuqian@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
These should be free of overflows now.
Bug: skia:7052
Change-Id: I05118fb8f565ffb0d973b6d93a8cd8d8e27f31a9
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84561
Reviewed-by: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I7baae5f90b2e510b66443cda449071c7c6ec9ec7
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/83520
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Bug: skia:7384
Change-Id: Ifcb19c864d422781d6023606406ac2b7dd23b0f8
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84121
Reviewed-by: Greg Daniel <egdaniel@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Perf was nice and flat after https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/83240
but there was a 4-5x slowdown on the benchmarks themselves,
indicating that perhaps we were running nanobench on the
LITTLE cores (now on powersave) instead of the big cores we
thought (which were recently scaled down).
This experiment will show us FOR CERTAIN that we are
running on core 0 or 1 which is at .6 max frequency.
We expect to see a speedup from the previous results.
This is leading to turning of CPUs we don't need
to make sure nanobench is running on the ones we expect.
Bug: skia:
NOTRY=true
Change-Id: Ida65181e4d90e778e65e3f22d761288b9ade64f6
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84201
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
