This should produce tighter conservative bounding boxes for text than the
approximation code it replaces.
Recording performance is neutral on my desktop. Playback performance
improves by up to 15% on text heavy pages, e.g.
desk_pokemonwiki.skp_1 3.24ms -> 2.83ms 0.87x
desk_baidu.skp_1 1.91ms -> 1.58ms 0.83x
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/bf8dc343df4fbdcb8af546eb68b640e011a33489
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Win7-ShuttleA-HD2000-x86-Debug-Trybot
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/680363003
This should produce tighter conservative bounding boxes for text than the
approximation code it replaces.
Recording performance is neutral on my desktop. Playback performance
improves by up to 15% on text heavy pages, e.g.
desk_pokemonwiki.skp_1 3.24ms -> 2.83ms 0.87x
desk_baidu.skp_1 1.91ms -> 1.58ms 0.83x
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/680363003
- The expected case is now a single bulk-load insert() call instead of N;
- reserve() and flushDeferredInserts() can fold into insert() now;
- SkBBH subclasses may take ownership of the bounds
This appears to be a performance no-op on both my Mac and N5. I guess
even the simplest indirect branch predictor ("same as last time") can predict
the repeated virtual calls to SkBBH::insert() perfectly.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/670213002
This is basically how blink uses the filter. Currently, I can't use it for "ShadowOnly" mode with the filter at all, but instead of copying the code and risking to have the codepaths diverge, I'm simply going to add the option here.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/646213004
This is once again an issue related to logo fonts, so I don't
see any easy way to add a regression test for this.
BUG=424824
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/665103002
I want to play around with how SkTileGrid stores its tiles. Having a
cap on the number of insert() calls can be pretty handy.
While I'm at it, I gave flush() a default empty impl. Like reserve(),
it's really an optional hook for subclasses.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/639933003
Now that the old backend's not using BBHs, we can specialize them for
SkRecord's needs. The only thing we really want to store is op index, which
should always be small enough to fit into an unsigned (unsigned also helps keep
it straight from other ints floating around).
This means we'll need half (32-bit) or a quarter (64-bit) the bytes in SkTileGrid,
because we don't have to store an extra int for ordering.
BUG=skia:2834
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/617393004
It makes no sense for the paint from a saveLayer to effect anything outside its saveLayer/restore block. But as currently written, we'll adjust the clip bounds just after a restore by that paint.
Turns out the test I wrote for the last CL (which caused this bug) actually had the bug baked into its expectations. I've updated them and added some notes to explain.
BUG=418417
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/623563002
Before this CL, SkRecord only adjusted the bounds of draw ops for SaveLayers' paints.
That worked fine, but as a final step we intersect the bounds of draw ops with the
bounds of the current clip, essentially undoing all that work.
I think the right fix here is to also adjust the bounds of the clip ops.
BUG=skia:2957, 415468
R=robertphillips@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/595953002
For now this only creates a degenerate bounding box hierarchy where all ops
just have maximal bounds. I will flesh out FillBounds in future CL(s).
Not quite sure why QuadTree and TileGrid aren't drawing right---haven't even
looked at the diffs yet---so I've disabled those test modes for now. RTree
seems fine, so that'll at least get us coverage for all this new plumbing.
BUG=skia:
R=robertphillips@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/454123003
- support fRecord in copy constructor
- support SkDrawPictureCallback
Moved SkDrawPictureCallback to its own header so
SkRecordDraw can include it without pulling in all of
SkPicture.
Adding an SkAutoSaveRestore to SkRecordDraw was the easiest
way to match the balance guarantees of the callback, and
probably not a bad idea in general. Updated its tests.
BUG=skia:
R=robertphillips@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/349973008
I'm soon going to have SkRecorder start calling getTotalMatrix(), which
would be broken in write-only mode. That change is big and nebulous,
but it's clear kWriteOnly needs to go, so we might as well kill it now.
My notes in bench_playback about kWriteOnly mode being important were
probably overly cautious. I now think this is a fair enough comparison
even re-recording into a read-write canvas.
BUG=skia:2378
R=fmalita@chromium.org, mtklein@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/290653004
git-svn-id: http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@14963 2bbb7eff-a529-9590-31e7-b0007b416f81
On Mike's suggestion, I tested out not doing any empty-clip check at all in
SkRecordDraw, given that mostly we'll do that again anyway inside SkCanvas.
Most SKPs are identical to the status quo, whether bot or silk, played back in tiles
or full. Average playback performance, both arithmetic and geometric mean, is also
unchanged.
A handful of SKPs do draw faster or slower reliably, particularly when tiled. E.g. a
cnn tile draws about 40% faster, a cuteoverload tile about 20% slower. Their profiles
look pretty much the same before and after, so I can't really explain the changes.
I'd say, given that performance is mostly identical and very identical in bulk,
we might as well remove this code. It's nice to keep SkRecordDraw as dumb as possible.
BUG=skia:2378
R=reed@google.com, fmalita@chromium.org, mtklein@google.com, borenet@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/258183002
git-svn-id: http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@14433 2bbb7eff-a529-9590-31e7-b0007b416f81
