This reverts commit 0fb1ee98cf.
Reason for revert: looks like this increased size by ~8K.
Original change's description:
> replace SkNVRefCnt with SkRefCnt
>
> SkNVRefCnt trades a small amount of code size (vtable) and runtime
> (vptr) memory usage for a larger amount of code size (templating). It
> was written back in a time when all we were really thinking about was
> runtime memory usage, so I'm curious to see where performance, code
> size, and memory usage all move if it's removed.
>
> Looking at the types I've changed here, my guess is that performance and
> memory usage will be basically unchanged, and that code size will drop a
> bit. Nothing else it's nicer to have only one ref-counting base class.
>
> Change-Id: I7d56a2b9e2b9fb000ff97792159ea1ff4f5e6f13
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/166203
> Reviewed-by: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
TBR=mtklein@google.com,bsalomon@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ibcfcc4b523c466a535bea5ffa30d0fe2574c5bd7
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/166360
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
SkNVRefCnt trades a small amount of code size (vtable) and runtime
(vptr) memory usage for a larger amount of code size (templating). It
was written back in a time when all we were really thinking about was
runtime memory usage, so I'm curious to see where performance, code
size, and memory usage all move if it's removed.
Looking at the types I've changed here, my guess is that performance and
memory usage will be basically unchanged, and that code size will drop a
bit. Nothing else it's nicer to have only one ref-counting base class.
Change-Id: I7d56a2b9e2b9fb000ff97792159ea1ff4f5e6f13
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/166203
Reviewed-by: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
