Reason for revert:
This kills Mac 10.6 bots.
FAILED: c++ -MMD -MF obj/src/opts/opts_sse4.SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.o.d -DSK_INTERNAL -DSK_GAMMA_SRGB -DSK_GAMMA_APPLY_TO_A8 -DSK_SCALAR_TO_FLOAT_EXCLUDED -DSK_ALLOW_STATIC_GLOBAL_INITIALIZERS=1 -DSK_SUPPORT_GPU=1 -DSK_SUPPORT_OPENCL=0 -DSK_FORCE_DISTANCE_FIELD_TEXT=0 -DSK_BUILD_FOR_MAC -DSK_CRASH_HANDLER -DSK_DEVELOPER=1 -I../../src/core -I../../src/utils -I../../include/c -I../../include/config -I../../include/core -I../../include/pathops -I../../include/pipe -I../../include/utils/mac -I../../include/effects -O0 -gdwarf-2 -mmacosx-version-min=10.6 -arch x86_64 -mssse3 -Wall -Wextra -Winit-self -Wpointer-arith -Wsign-compare -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-invalid-offsetof -msse4.1 -c ../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp -o obj/src/opts/opts_sse4.SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.o
../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp:15:27: warning: x86intrin.h: No such file or directory
../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp: In function 'void S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_SSE4(SkPMColor*, const SkPMColor*, int, U8CPU)':
../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp:40: error: '_mm_testz_si128' was not declared in this scope
../../src/opts/SkBlitRow_opts_SSE4.cpp:45: error: '_mm_testc_si128' was not declared in this scope
Original issue's description:
> SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly.
>
> Since we had such a hard time with the assembly versions of this blit (to the
> point that we have them completely disabled everywhere), I thought I'd take
> a shot at writing a version of the blit using intrinsics.
>
> The key feature of SSE4 we're exploiting is that we can use ptest (_mm_test*)
> to skip the blend when the 16 src pixels we consider each loop are all opaque
> or all transparent. _mm_shuffle_epi8 from SSSE3 also lends a hand to extract
> all those alphas.
>
> It's worth looking to see if we can backport this type of logic to SSE2 using
> _mm_movemask_epi8, or up to 32 pixels at a time using AVX.
>
> My local performance testing doesn't show this to be an unambiguous win
> (there are probably microbenchmarks and SKPs where we'd be better off just
> powering through the blend rather than looking at alphas), but the potential
> does seem tantalizing enough to let skiaperf vet it on the bots. (< 1.0x is a win.)
>
> DM says it draws pixel perfect compare to the old code.
>
> Microbenchmarks:
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_two 14us -> 14.4us 1.03x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_three 14.3us -> 14.5us 1.01x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp 61.9us -> 62.2us 1.01x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 102us -> 101us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale 18.4us -> 18.2us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic 71us -> 70us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 109us 0.98x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile 5.72us -> 5.58us 0.98x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888 5.73us -> 5.58us 0.97x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update 5.78us -> 5.6us 0.97x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bilerp 70.7us -> 68us 0.96x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bicubic 23.7us -> 21.8us 0.92x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A 13.9us -> 10.9us 0.78x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_opaque 14us -> 6.29us 0.45x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_transparent 14us -> 3.65us 0.26x
>
> Running over our ~70 SKP web page captures, this looks like we spend 0.7x
> the time in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow compared to the SSE2 version, which should
> be a decent predictor of real-world impact.
>
> BUG=chromium:399842
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/04bc91b972417038fecfa87c484771eac2b9b785TBR=henrik.smiding@intel.com,mtklein@google.com,herb@google.com,reed@google.com,thakis@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:399842
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/874033004
2d80dd2647