v8/test/cctest/test-stack-unwinding-win64.cc

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

128 lines
4.3 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

Reland "V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames" This is a reland of 3cda21de77d098a612eadf44d504b188a599c5f0 Original change's description: > V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames > > On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64 > backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI > compliant stack frames. See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit > for more details. > > This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same > prolog and epilog: > > push rbp, > mov rbp, rsp > ... > pop rbp > ret N > > and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows > should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all > allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a > single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated > inside that code-range. > > This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64: > > EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins > snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and > in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking > for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported). > The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit > this unwind info for builtins. > > Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering > dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new > Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is > destroyed. > > Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in > wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp). > > It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering > PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded > builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the > same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API: > SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own > unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code. > V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR > in the Chromium repository: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703). > > All these changes are experimental, behind: > > the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and > the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag. > > Bug: v8:3598 > Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329 > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330} Bug: v8:3598 Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618 Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
2019-04-01 21:43:23 +00:00
// Copyright 2019 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file.
Reland "[include] Split out v8.h" This is a reland of d1b27019d3bf86360ea838c317f8505fac6d3a7e Fixes include: Adding missing file to bazel build Forward-declaring classing before friend-classing them to fix win/gcc Add missing v8-isolate.h include for vtune builds Original change's description: > [include] Split out v8.h > > This moves every single class/function out of include/v8.h into a > separate header in include/, which v8.h then includes so that > externally nothing appears to have changed. > > Every include of v8.h from inside v8 has been changed to a more > fine-grained include. > > Previously inline functions defined at the bottom of v8.h would call > private non-inline functions in the V8 class. Since that class is now > in v8-initialization.h and is rarely included (as that would create > dependency cycles), this is not possible and so those methods have been > moved out of the V8 class into the namespace v8::api_internal. > > None of the previous files in include/ now #include v8.h, which means > if embedders were relying on this transitive dependency then it will > give compile failures. > > v8-inspector.h does depend on v8-scripts.h for the time being to ensure > that Chrome continue to compile but that change will be reverted once > those transitive #includes in chrome are changed to include it directly. > > Full design: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rTD--I8hCAr-Rho1WTumZzFKaDpEp0IJ8ejZtk4nJdA/edit?usp=sharing > > Bug: v8:11965 > Change-Id: I53b84b29581632710edc80eb11f819c2097a2877 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3097448 > Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76424} Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_vtunejit Bug: v8:11965 Change-Id: I99f5d3a73bf8fe25b650adfaf9567dc4e44a09e6 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3113629 Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76460}
2021-08-23 13:01:06 +00:00
#include "include/v8-external.h"
#include "include/v8-function.h"
#include "include/v8-isolate.h"
#include "include/v8-local-handle.h"
#include "include/v8-template.h"
Reland "V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames" This is a reland of 3cda21de77d098a612eadf44d504b188a599c5f0 Original change's description: > V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames > > On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64 > backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI > compliant stack frames. See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit > for more details. > > This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same > prolog and epilog: > > push rbp, > mov rbp, rsp > ... > pop rbp > ret N > > and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows > should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all > allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a > single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated > inside that code-range. > > This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64: > > EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins > snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and > in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking > for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported). > The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit > this unwind info for builtins. > > Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering > dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new > Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is > destroyed. > > Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in > wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp). > > It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering > PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded > builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the > same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API: > SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own > unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code. > V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR > in the Chromium repository: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703). > > All these changes are experimental, behind: > > the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and > the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag. > > Bug: v8:3598 > Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329 > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330} Bug: v8:3598 Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618 Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
2019-04-01 21:43:23 +00:00
#include "src/base/win32-headers.h"
#include "src/init/v8.h"
Reland "V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames" This is a reland of 3cda21de77d098a612eadf44d504b188a599c5f0 Original change's description: > V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames > > On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64 > backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI > compliant stack frames. See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit > for more details. > > This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same > prolog and epilog: > > push rbp, > mov rbp, rsp > ... > pop rbp > ret N > > and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows > should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all > allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a > single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated > inside that code-range. > > This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64: > > EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins > snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and > in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking > for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported). > The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit > this unwind info for builtins. > > Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering > dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new > Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is > destroyed. > > Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in > wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp). > > It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering > PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded > builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the > same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API: > SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own > unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code. > V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR > in the Chromium repository: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703). > > All these changes are experimental, behind: > > the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and > the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag. > > Bug: v8:3598 > Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329 > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330} Bug: v8:3598 Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618 Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
2019-04-01 21:43:23 +00:00
#include "test/cctest/cctest.h"
Unwind V8 frames correctly on Windows ARM64 On Windows ARM64, OS stack walking does not work because the V8 ARM64 backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames. This was fixed for Windows X64 (https://crrev.com/c/1469329) and documented below: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0 This problem can be fixed similarly for Windows ARM64 by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same prolog which maintains a chain via frame pointer (fp or x29 register). stp fp, lr, [sp, ...] One exception is JSEntry which stops fp pointer chain and needs to be handled specially. So it is possible to define XDATA with UNWIND_CODE which specify how Windows should walk through V8 dynamic frames. The same as X64, since V8 Code objects are all allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register at most 2 XDATA and a group of PDATA entries to cover stack walking for all the code generated inside that code-range. This is more than 1 PDATA/XDATA because according to the Windows ARM64 exeption handling document, 1 PDATA can cover less than 1MB code range (see below doc). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-exception-handling This PR implements stackwalk for Windows ARM64 to be on par with X64, including embedded builtins, jitted code and wasm jitted code, but not including register handler for handling exception only, because there is no backward compatibility to maintain for Windows ARM64 which was released since 1709 windows build. Bug: chromium:893460 Change-Id: Ic74cbdad8af5cf342185030a4c53796f12ea5429 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1701133 Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63002}
2019-07-27 06:36:52 +00:00
#if defined(V8_OS_WIN_X64)
#define CONTEXT_PC(context) (context.Rip)
#elif defined(V8_OS_WIN_ARM64)
#define CONTEXT_PC(context) (context.Pc)
#endif
#include <windows.h>
// This has to come after windows.h.
#include <versionhelpers.h> // For IsWindows8OrGreater().
Unwind V8 frames correctly on Windows ARM64 On Windows ARM64, OS stack walking does not work because the V8 ARM64 backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames. This was fixed for Windows X64 (https://crrev.com/c/1469329) and documented below: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0 This problem can be fixed similarly for Windows ARM64 by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same prolog which maintains a chain via frame pointer (fp or x29 register). stp fp, lr, [sp, ...] One exception is JSEntry which stops fp pointer chain and needs to be handled specially. So it is possible to define XDATA with UNWIND_CODE which specify how Windows should walk through V8 dynamic frames. The same as X64, since V8 Code objects are all allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register at most 2 XDATA and a group of PDATA entries to cover stack walking for all the code generated inside that code-range. This is more than 1 PDATA/XDATA because according to the Windows ARM64 exeption handling document, 1 PDATA can cover less than 1MB code range (see below doc). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-exception-handling This PR implements stackwalk for Windows ARM64 to be on par with X64, including embedded builtins, jitted code and wasm jitted code, but not including register handler for handling exception only, because there is no backward compatibility to maintain for Windows ARM64 which was released since 1709 windows build. Bug: chromium:893460 Change-Id: Ic74cbdad8af5cf342185030a4c53796f12ea5429 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1701133 Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63002}
2019-07-27 06:36:52 +00:00
class UnwindingWin64Callbacks {
Reland "V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames" This is a reland of 3cda21de77d098a612eadf44d504b188a599c5f0 Original change's description: > V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames > > On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64 > backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI > compliant stack frames. See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit > for more details. > > This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same > prolog and epilog: > > push rbp, > mov rbp, rsp > ... > pop rbp > ret N > > and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows > should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all > allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a > single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated > inside that code-range. > > This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64: > > EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins > snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and > in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking > for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported). > The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit > this unwind info for builtins. > > Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering > dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new > Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is > destroyed. > > Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in > wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp). > > It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering > PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded > builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the > same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API: > SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own > unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code. > V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR > in the Chromium repository: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703). > > All these changes are experimental, behind: > > the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and > the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag. > > Bug: v8:3598 > Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329 > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330} Bug: v8:3598 Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618 Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
2019-04-01 21:43:23 +00:00
public:
Unwind V8 frames correctly on Windows ARM64 On Windows ARM64, OS stack walking does not work because the V8 ARM64 backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames. This was fixed for Windows X64 (https://crrev.com/c/1469329) and documented below: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0 This problem can be fixed similarly for Windows ARM64 by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same prolog which maintains a chain via frame pointer (fp or x29 register). stp fp, lr, [sp, ...] One exception is JSEntry which stops fp pointer chain and needs to be handled specially. So it is possible to define XDATA with UNWIND_CODE which specify how Windows should walk through V8 dynamic frames. The same as X64, since V8 Code objects are all allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register at most 2 XDATA and a group of PDATA entries to cover stack walking for all the code generated inside that code-range. This is more than 1 PDATA/XDATA because according to the Windows ARM64 exeption handling document, 1 PDATA can cover less than 1MB code range (see below doc). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-exception-handling This PR implements stackwalk for Windows ARM64 to be on par with X64, including embedded builtins, jitted code and wasm jitted code, but not including register handler for handling exception only, because there is no backward compatibility to maintain for Windows ARM64 which was released since 1709 windows build. Bug: chromium:893460 Change-Id: Ic74cbdad8af5cf342185030a4c53796f12ea5429 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1701133 Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63002}
2019-07-27 06:36:52 +00:00
UnwindingWin64Callbacks() = default;
Reland "V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames" This is a reland of 3cda21de77d098a612eadf44d504b188a599c5f0 Original change's description: > V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames > > On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64 > backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI > compliant stack frames. See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit > for more details. > > This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same > prolog and epilog: > > push rbp, > mov rbp, rsp > ... > pop rbp > ret N > > and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows > should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all > allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a > single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated > inside that code-range. > > This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64: > > EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins > snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and > in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking > for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported). > The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit > this unwind info for builtins. > > Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering > dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new > Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is > destroyed. > > Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in > wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp). > > It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering > PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded > builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the > same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API: > SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own > unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code. > V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR > in the Chromium repository: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703). > > All these changes are experimental, behind: > > the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and > the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag. > > Bug: v8:3598 > Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329 > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330} Bug: v8:3598 Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618 Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
2019-04-01 21:43:23 +00:00
static void Getter(v8::Local<v8::String> name,
const v8::PropertyCallbackInfo<v8::Value>& info) {
// Expects to find at least 15 stack frames in the call stack.
// The stack walking should fail on stack frames for builtin functions if
// stack unwinding data has not been correctly registered.
int stack_frames = CountCallStackFrames(15);
CHECK_GE(stack_frames, 15);
}
static void Setter(v8::Local<v8::String> name, v8::Local<v8::Value> value,
const v8::PropertyCallbackInfo<void>& info) {}
private:
// Windows-specific code to walk the stack starting from the current
// instruction pointer.
static int CountCallStackFrames(int max_frames) {
CONTEXT context_record;
::RtlCaptureContext(&context_record);
int iframe = 0;
while (++iframe < max_frames) {
uint64_t image_base;
Unwind V8 frames correctly on Windows ARM64 On Windows ARM64, OS stack walking does not work because the V8 ARM64 backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames. This was fixed for Windows X64 (https://crrev.com/c/1469329) and documented below: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0 This problem can be fixed similarly for Windows ARM64 by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same prolog which maintains a chain via frame pointer (fp or x29 register). stp fp, lr, [sp, ...] One exception is JSEntry which stops fp pointer chain and needs to be handled specially. So it is possible to define XDATA with UNWIND_CODE which specify how Windows should walk through V8 dynamic frames. The same as X64, since V8 Code objects are all allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register at most 2 XDATA and a group of PDATA entries to cover stack walking for all the code generated inside that code-range. This is more than 1 PDATA/XDATA because according to the Windows ARM64 exeption handling document, 1 PDATA can cover less than 1MB code range (see below doc). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-exception-handling This PR implements stackwalk for Windows ARM64 to be on par with X64, including embedded builtins, jitted code and wasm jitted code, but not including register handler for handling exception only, because there is no backward compatibility to maintain for Windows ARM64 which was released since 1709 windows build. Bug: chromium:893460 Change-Id: Ic74cbdad8af5cf342185030a4c53796f12ea5429 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1701133 Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63002}
2019-07-27 06:36:52 +00:00
PRUNTIME_FUNCTION function_entry = ::RtlLookupFunctionEntry(
CONTEXT_PC(context_record), &image_base, nullptr);
Reland "V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames" This is a reland of 3cda21de77d098a612eadf44d504b188a599c5f0 Original change's description: > V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames > > On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64 > backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI > compliant stack frames. See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit > for more details. > > This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same > prolog and epilog: > > push rbp, > mov rbp, rsp > ... > pop rbp > ret N > > and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows > should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all > allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a > single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated > inside that code-range. > > This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64: > > EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins > snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and > in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking > for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported). > The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit > this unwind info for builtins. > > Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering > dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new > Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is > destroyed. > > Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in > wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp). > > It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering > PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded > builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the > same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API: > SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own > unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code. > V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR > in the Chromium repository: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703). > > All these changes are experimental, behind: > > the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and > the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag. > > Bug: v8:3598 > Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329 > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330} Bug: v8:3598 Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618 Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
2019-04-01 21:43:23 +00:00
if (!function_entry) break;
void* handler_data;
uint64_t establisher_frame;
Unwind V8 frames correctly on Windows ARM64 On Windows ARM64, OS stack walking does not work because the V8 ARM64 backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames. This was fixed for Windows X64 (https://crrev.com/c/1469329) and documented below: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0 This problem can be fixed similarly for Windows ARM64 by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same prolog which maintains a chain via frame pointer (fp or x29 register). stp fp, lr, [sp, ...] One exception is JSEntry which stops fp pointer chain and needs to be handled specially. So it is possible to define XDATA with UNWIND_CODE which specify how Windows should walk through V8 dynamic frames. The same as X64, since V8 Code objects are all allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register at most 2 XDATA and a group of PDATA entries to cover stack walking for all the code generated inside that code-range. This is more than 1 PDATA/XDATA because according to the Windows ARM64 exeption handling document, 1 PDATA can cover less than 1MB code range (see below doc). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-exception-handling This PR implements stackwalk for Windows ARM64 to be on par with X64, including embedded builtins, jitted code and wasm jitted code, but not including register handler for handling exception only, because there is no backward compatibility to maintain for Windows ARM64 which was released since 1709 windows build. Bug: chromium:893460 Change-Id: Ic74cbdad8af5cf342185030a4c53796f12ea5429 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1701133 Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63002}
2019-07-27 06:36:52 +00:00
::RtlVirtualUnwind(UNW_FLAG_NHANDLER, image_base,
CONTEXT_PC(context_record), function_entry,
&context_record, &handler_data, &establisher_frame,
NULL);
Reland "V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames" This is a reland of 3cda21de77d098a612eadf44d504b188a599c5f0 Original change's description: > V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames > > On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64 > backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI > compliant stack frames. See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit > for more details. > > This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same > prolog and epilog: > > push rbp, > mov rbp, rsp > ... > pop rbp > ret N > > and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows > should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all > allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a > single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated > inside that code-range. > > This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64: > > EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins > snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and > in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking > for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported). > The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit > this unwind info for builtins. > > Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering > dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new > Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is > destroyed. > > Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in > wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp). > > It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering > PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded > builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the > same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API: > SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own > unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code. > V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR > in the Chromium repository: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703). > > All these changes are experimental, behind: > > the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and > the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag. > > Bug: v8:3598 > Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329 > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330} Bug: v8:3598 Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618 Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
2019-04-01 21:43:23 +00:00
}
return iframe;
}
};
Unwind V8 frames correctly on Windows ARM64 On Windows ARM64, OS stack walking does not work because the V8 ARM64 backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames. This was fixed for Windows X64 (https://crrev.com/c/1469329) and documented below: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0 This problem can be fixed similarly for Windows ARM64 by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same prolog which maintains a chain via frame pointer (fp or x29 register). stp fp, lr, [sp, ...] One exception is JSEntry which stops fp pointer chain and needs to be handled specially. So it is possible to define XDATA with UNWIND_CODE which specify how Windows should walk through V8 dynamic frames. The same as X64, since V8 Code objects are all allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register at most 2 XDATA and a group of PDATA entries to cover stack walking for all the code generated inside that code-range. This is more than 1 PDATA/XDATA because according to the Windows ARM64 exeption handling document, 1 PDATA can cover less than 1MB code range (see below doc). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-exception-handling This PR implements stackwalk for Windows ARM64 to be on par with X64, including embedded builtins, jitted code and wasm jitted code, but not including register handler for handling exception only, because there is no backward compatibility to maintain for Windows ARM64 which was released since 1709 windows build. Bug: chromium:893460 Change-Id: Ic74cbdad8af5cf342185030a4c53796f12ea5429 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1701133 Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63002}
2019-07-27 06:36:52 +00:00
// Verifies that stack unwinding data has been correctly registered on Win64.
UNINITIALIZED_TEST(StackUnwindingWin64) {
Reland "V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames" This is a reland of 3cda21de77d098a612eadf44d504b188a599c5f0 Original change's description: > V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames > > On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64 > backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI > compliant stack frames. See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit > for more details. > > This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same > prolog and epilog: > > push rbp, > mov rbp, rsp > ... > pop rbp > ret N > > and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows > should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all > allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a > single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated > inside that code-range. > > This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64: > > EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins > snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and > in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking > for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported). > The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit > this unwind info for builtins. > > Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering > dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new > Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is > destroyed. > > Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in > wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp). > > It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering > PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded > builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the > same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API: > SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own > unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code. > V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR > in the Chromium repository: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703). > > All these changes are experimental, behind: > > the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and > the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag. > > Bug: v8:3598 > Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329 > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330} Bug: v8:3598 Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618 Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
2019-04-01 21:43:23 +00:00
#ifdef V8_WIN64_UNWINDING_INFO
Unwind V8 frames correctly on Windows ARM64 On Windows ARM64, OS stack walking does not work because the V8 ARM64 backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames. This was fixed for Windows X64 (https://crrev.com/c/1469329) and documented below: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0 This problem can be fixed similarly for Windows ARM64 by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same prolog which maintains a chain via frame pointer (fp or x29 register). stp fp, lr, [sp, ...] One exception is JSEntry which stops fp pointer chain and needs to be handled specially. So it is possible to define XDATA with UNWIND_CODE which specify how Windows should walk through V8 dynamic frames. The same as X64, since V8 Code objects are all allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register at most 2 XDATA and a group of PDATA entries to cover stack walking for all the code generated inside that code-range. This is more than 1 PDATA/XDATA because according to the Windows ARM64 exeption handling document, 1 PDATA can cover less than 1MB code range (see below doc). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-exception-handling This PR implements stackwalk for Windows ARM64 to be on par with X64, including embedded builtins, jitted code and wasm jitted code, but not including register handler for handling exception only, because there is no backward compatibility to maintain for Windows ARM64 which was released since 1709 windows build. Bug: chromium:893460 Change-Id: Ic74cbdad8af5cf342185030a4c53796f12ea5429 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1701133 Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63002}
2019-07-27 06:36:52 +00:00
static const char* unwinding_win64_test_source =
Reland "V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames" This is a reland of 3cda21de77d098a612eadf44d504b188a599c5f0 Original change's description: > V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames > > On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64 > backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI > compliant stack frames. See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit > for more details. > > This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same > prolog and epilog: > > push rbp, > mov rbp, rsp > ... > pop rbp > ret N > > and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows > should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all > allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a > single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated > inside that code-range. > > This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64: > > EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins > snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and > in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking > for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported). > The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit > this unwind info for builtins. > > Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering > dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new > Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is > destroyed. > > Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in > wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp). > > It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering > PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded > builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the > same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API: > SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own > unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code. > V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR > in the Chromium repository: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703). > > All these changes are experimental, behind: > > the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and > the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag. > > Bug: v8:3598 > Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329 > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330} Bug: v8:3598 Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618 Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
2019-04-01 21:43:23 +00:00
"function start(count) {\n"
" for (var i = 0; i < count; i++) {\n"
" var o = instance.foo;\n"
" instance.foo = o + 1;\n"
" }\n"
"};\n"
"%PrepareFunctionForOptimization(start);\n";
Reland "V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames" This is a reland of 3cda21de77d098a612eadf44d504b188a599c5f0 Original change's description: > V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames > > On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64 > backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI > compliant stack frames. See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit > for more details. > > This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same > prolog and epilog: > > push rbp, > mov rbp, rsp > ... > pop rbp > ret N > > and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows > should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all > allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a > single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated > inside that code-range. > > This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64: > > EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins > snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and > in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking > for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported). > The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit > this unwind info for builtins. > > Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering > dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new > Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is > destroyed. > > Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in > wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp). > > It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering > PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded > builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the > same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API: > SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own > unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code. > V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR > in the Chromium repository: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703). > > All these changes are experimental, behind: > > the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and > the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag. > > Bug: v8:3598 > Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329 > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330} Bug: v8:3598 Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618 Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
2019-04-01 21:43:23 +00:00
// This test may fail on Windows 7
if (!::IsWindows8OrGreater()) {
return;
}
i::FLAG_allow_natives_syntax = true;
i::FLAG_win64_unwinding_info = true;
v8::Isolate::CreateParams create_params;
create_params.array_buffer_allocator = CcTest::array_buffer_allocator();
v8::Isolate* isolate = v8::Isolate::New(create_params);
isolate->Enter();
{
v8::HandleScope scope(isolate);
LocalContext env(isolate);
v8::Local<v8::FunctionTemplate> func_template =
v8::FunctionTemplate::New(isolate);
v8::Local<v8::ObjectTemplate> instance_template =
func_template->InstanceTemplate();
Unwind V8 frames correctly on Windows ARM64 On Windows ARM64, OS stack walking does not work because the V8 ARM64 backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames. This was fixed for Windows X64 (https://crrev.com/c/1469329) and documented below: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0 This problem can be fixed similarly for Windows ARM64 by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same prolog which maintains a chain via frame pointer (fp or x29 register). stp fp, lr, [sp, ...] One exception is JSEntry which stops fp pointer chain and needs to be handled specially. So it is possible to define XDATA with UNWIND_CODE which specify how Windows should walk through V8 dynamic frames. The same as X64, since V8 Code objects are all allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register at most 2 XDATA and a group of PDATA entries to cover stack walking for all the code generated inside that code-range. This is more than 1 PDATA/XDATA because according to the Windows ARM64 exeption handling document, 1 PDATA can cover less than 1MB code range (see below doc). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-exception-handling This PR implements stackwalk for Windows ARM64 to be on par with X64, including embedded builtins, jitted code and wasm jitted code, but not including register handler for handling exception only, because there is no backward compatibility to maintain for Windows ARM64 which was released since 1709 windows build. Bug: chromium:893460 Change-Id: Ic74cbdad8af5cf342185030a4c53796f12ea5429 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1701133 Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63002}
2019-07-27 06:36:52 +00:00
UnwindingWin64Callbacks accessors;
Reland "V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames" This is a reland of 3cda21de77d098a612eadf44d504b188a599c5f0 Original change's description: > V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames > > On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64 > backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI > compliant stack frames. See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit > for more details. > > This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same > prolog and epilog: > > push rbp, > mov rbp, rsp > ... > pop rbp > ret N > > and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows > should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all > allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a > single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated > inside that code-range. > > This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64: > > EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins > snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and > in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking > for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported). > The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit > this unwind info for builtins. > > Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering > dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new > Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is > destroyed. > > Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in > wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp). > > It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering > PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded > builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the > same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API: > SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own > unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code. > V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR > in the Chromium repository: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703). > > All these changes are experimental, behind: > > the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and > the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag. > > Bug: v8:3598 > Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329 > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330} Bug: v8:3598 Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618 Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
2019-04-01 21:43:23 +00:00
v8::Local<v8::External> data = v8::External::New(isolate, &accessors);
instance_template->SetAccessor(v8_str("foo"),
Unwind V8 frames correctly on Windows ARM64 On Windows ARM64, OS stack walking does not work because the V8 ARM64 backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames. This was fixed for Windows X64 (https://crrev.com/c/1469329) and documented below: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0 This problem can be fixed similarly for Windows ARM64 by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same prolog which maintains a chain via frame pointer (fp or x29 register). stp fp, lr, [sp, ...] One exception is JSEntry which stops fp pointer chain and needs to be handled specially. So it is possible to define XDATA with UNWIND_CODE which specify how Windows should walk through V8 dynamic frames. The same as X64, since V8 Code objects are all allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register at most 2 XDATA and a group of PDATA entries to cover stack walking for all the code generated inside that code-range. This is more than 1 PDATA/XDATA because according to the Windows ARM64 exeption handling document, 1 PDATA can cover less than 1MB code range (see below doc). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-exception-handling This PR implements stackwalk for Windows ARM64 to be on par with X64, including embedded builtins, jitted code and wasm jitted code, but not including register handler for handling exception only, because there is no backward compatibility to maintain for Windows ARM64 which was released since 1709 windows build. Bug: chromium:893460 Change-Id: Ic74cbdad8af5cf342185030a4c53796f12ea5429 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1701133 Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63002}
2019-07-27 06:36:52 +00:00
&UnwindingWin64Callbacks::Getter,
&UnwindingWin64Callbacks::Setter, data);
Reland "V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames" This is a reland of 3cda21de77d098a612eadf44d504b188a599c5f0 Original change's description: > V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames > > On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64 > backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI > compliant stack frames. See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit > for more details. > > This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same > prolog and epilog: > > push rbp, > mov rbp, rsp > ... > pop rbp > ret N > > and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows > should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all > allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a > single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated > inside that code-range. > > This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64: > > EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins > snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and > in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking > for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported). > The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit > this unwind info for builtins. > > Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering > dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new > Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is > destroyed. > > Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in > wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp). > > It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering > PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded > builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the > same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API: > SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own > unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code. > V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR > in the Chromium repository: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703). > > All these changes are experimental, behind: > > the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and > the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag. > > Bug: v8:3598 > Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329 > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330} Bug: v8:3598 Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618 Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
2019-04-01 21:43:23 +00:00
v8::Local<v8::Function> func =
func_template->GetFunction(env.local()).ToLocalChecked();
v8::Local<v8::Object> instance =
func->NewInstance(env.local()).ToLocalChecked();
env->Global()->Set(env.local(), v8_str("instance"), instance).FromJust();
Unwind V8 frames correctly on Windows ARM64 On Windows ARM64, OS stack walking does not work because the V8 ARM64 backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames. This was fixed for Windows X64 (https://crrev.com/c/1469329) and documented below: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0 This problem can be fixed similarly for Windows ARM64 by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same prolog which maintains a chain via frame pointer (fp or x29 register). stp fp, lr, [sp, ...] One exception is JSEntry which stops fp pointer chain and needs to be handled specially. So it is possible to define XDATA with UNWIND_CODE which specify how Windows should walk through V8 dynamic frames. The same as X64, since V8 Code objects are all allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register at most 2 XDATA and a group of PDATA entries to cover stack walking for all the code generated inside that code-range. This is more than 1 PDATA/XDATA because according to the Windows ARM64 exeption handling document, 1 PDATA can cover less than 1MB code range (see below doc). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-exception-handling This PR implements stackwalk for Windows ARM64 to be on par with X64, including embedded builtins, jitted code and wasm jitted code, but not including register handler for handling exception only, because there is no backward compatibility to maintain for Windows ARM64 which was released since 1709 windows build. Bug: chromium:893460 Change-Id: Ic74cbdad8af5cf342185030a4c53796f12ea5429 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1701133 Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63002}
2019-07-27 06:36:52 +00:00
CompileRun(unwinding_win64_test_source);
Reland "V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames" This is a reland of 3cda21de77d098a612eadf44d504b188a599c5f0 Original change's description: > V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames > > On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64 > backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI > compliant stack frames. See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit > for more details. > > This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same > prolog and epilog: > > push rbp, > mov rbp, rsp > ... > pop rbp > ret N > > and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows > should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all > allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a > single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated > inside that code-range. > > This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64: > > EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins > snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and > in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking > for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported). > The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit > this unwind info for builtins. > > Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering > dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new > Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is > destroyed. > > Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in > wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp). > > It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering > PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded > builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the > same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API: > SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own > unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code. > V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR > in the Chromium repository: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703). > > All these changes are experimental, behind: > > the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and > the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag. > > Bug: v8:3598 > Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329 > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330} Bug: v8:3598 Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618 Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
2019-04-01 21:43:23 +00:00
v8::Local<v8::Function> function = v8::Local<v8::Function>::Cast(
env->Global()->Get(env.local(), v8_str("start")).ToLocalChecked());
CompileRun("start(1); %OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(start);");
Reland "V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames" This is a reland of 3cda21de77d098a612eadf44d504b188a599c5f0 Original change's description: > V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames > > On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64 > backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI > compliant stack frames. See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit > for more details. > > This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same > prolog and epilog: > > push rbp, > mov rbp, rsp > ... > pop rbp > ret N > > and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows > should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all > allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a > single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated > inside that code-range. > > This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64: > > EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins > snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and > in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking > for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported). > The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit > this unwind info for builtins. > > Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering > dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new > Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is > destroyed. > > Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in > wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp). > > It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering > PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded > builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the > same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API: > SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own > unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code. > V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR > in the Chromium repository: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703). > > All these changes are experimental, behind: > > the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and > the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag. > > Bug: v8:3598 > Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329 > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330} Bug: v8:3598 Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618 Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
2019-04-01 21:43:23 +00:00
int32_t repeat_count = 100;
v8::Local<v8::Value> args[] = {v8::Integer::New(isolate, repeat_count)};
function->Call(env.local(), env.local()->Global(), arraysize(args), args)
.ToLocalChecked();
}
isolate->Exit();
isolate->Dispose();
#endif // V8_WIN64_UNWINDING_INFO
}
Unwind V8 frames correctly on Windows ARM64 On Windows ARM64, OS stack walking does not work because the V8 ARM64 backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames. This was fixed for Windows X64 (https://crrev.com/c/1469329) and documented below: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0 This problem can be fixed similarly for Windows ARM64 by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same prolog which maintains a chain via frame pointer (fp or x29 register). stp fp, lr, [sp, ...] One exception is JSEntry which stops fp pointer chain and needs to be handled specially. So it is possible to define XDATA with UNWIND_CODE which specify how Windows should walk through V8 dynamic frames. The same as X64, since V8 Code objects are all allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register at most 2 XDATA and a group of PDATA entries to cover stack walking for all the code generated inside that code-range. This is more than 1 PDATA/XDATA because according to the Windows ARM64 exeption handling document, 1 PDATA can cover less than 1MB code range (see below doc). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-exception-handling This PR implements stackwalk for Windows ARM64 to be on par with X64, including embedded builtins, jitted code and wasm jitted code, but not including register handler for handling exception only, because there is no backward compatibility to maintain for Windows ARM64 which was released since 1709 windows build. Bug: chromium:893460 Change-Id: Ic74cbdad8af5cf342185030a4c53796f12ea5429 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1701133 Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63002}
2019-07-27 06:36:52 +00:00
#undef CONTEXT_PC