v8/test/cctest/interpreter/bytecode_expectations/UnaryOperators.golden

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

175 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

#
# Autogenerated by generate-bytecode-expectations.
#
---
wrap: yes
---
snippet: "
var x = 0;
while (x != 10) {
x = x + 10;
}
return x;
"
frame size: 1
parameter count: 1
bytecode array length: 25
bytecodes: [
/* 30 E> */ B(StackCheck),
/* 42 S> */ B(LdaZero),
B(Star), R(0),
/* 54 S> */ B(LdaSmi), I8(10),
/* 54 E> */ B(TestEqual), R(0), U8(0),
B(JumpIfTrue), U8(13),
/* 45 E> */ B(StackCheck),
Reland: [Interpreter] Move BinaryOp Smi transformation into BytecodeGenerator."" This relands commit d3e9aade0ff24e100621ab451e83f703439ace9e. The original CL was reverted speculatively but didn't cause the buildbot failure. Original change's description: > [Interpreter] Move BinaryOp Smi transformation into BytecodeGenerator. > > Perform the transformation to <BinaryOp>Smi for Binary ops which take Smi > literals in the BytecodeGenerator. This enables us to perform the > transformation for literals on either side for commutative operations, and > Avoids having to do the check on every bytecode in the peephole optimizer. > > In the process, adds Smi bytecode variants for all binary operations, adding > - MulSmi > - DivSmi > - ModSmi > - BitwiseXorSmi > - ShiftRightLogical > > BUG=v8:6194 > > Change-Id: If1484252f5385c16957004b9cac8bfbb1f209219 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466246 > Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44477} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,machenbach@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,mythria@chromium.org,v8-reviews@googlegroups.com,ishell@chromium.org # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago. BUG=v8:6194 Change-Id: I2ccaefa1ce58d3885f5c2648755985c06f25c1d8 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472746 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44511}
2017-04-10 09:30:51 +00:00
/* 65 S> */ B(Ldar), R(0),
/* 71 E> */ B(AddSmi), I8(10), U8(1),
B(Star), R(0),
B(JumpLoop), U8(15), I8(0),
/* 79 S> */ B(Ldar), R(0),
[inspector] improve return position of explicit return in non-async function Goal of this CL: explicit return from non-async function has position after return expression as return position (will unblock [1]). BytecodeArrayBuilder has SetStatementPosition and SetExpressionPosition methods. If one of these methods is called then next generated bytecode will get passed position. It's general treatment for most cases. Unfortunately it doesn't work for Returns: - debugger requires source positions exactly on kReturn bytecode in stepping implementation, - BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn and BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn generates more then one bytecode and general solution will put return position on first generated bytecode, - it's not easy to split BuildReturn function into two parts to allow something like following in BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement since generated bytecodes are actually controlled by execution_control(). ..->BuildReturnPrologue(); ..->SetReturnPosition(stmt); ..->Return(); In this CL we pass ReturnStatement through ExecutionControl and use it for position when we emit return bytecode right here. So this CL only will improve return position for returns inside of non-async functions, I'll address async functions later. [1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/543161/ Change-Id: Iede512c120b00c209990bf50c20e7d23dc0d65db Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560738 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46687}
2017-07-14 17:50:09 +00:00
/* 88 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
]
handlers: [
]
---
snippet: "
var x = false;
do {
x = !x;
} while(x == false);
return x;
"
frame size: 1
parameter count: 1
bytecode array length: 22
bytecodes: [
/* 30 E> */ B(StackCheck),
/* 42 S> */ B(LdaFalse),
B(Star), R(0),
/* 49 E> */ B(StackCheck),
/* 56 S> */ B(Ldar), R(0),
B(ToBooleanLogicalNot),
B(Star), R(0),
/* 74 S> */ B(LdaFalse),
/* 74 E> */ B(TestEqual), R(0), U8(0),
B(JumpIfFalse), U8(5),
B(JumpLoop), U8(12), I8(0),
/* 85 S> */ B(Ldar), R(0),
[inspector] improve return position of explicit return in non-async function Goal of this CL: explicit return from non-async function has position after return expression as return position (will unblock [1]). BytecodeArrayBuilder has SetStatementPosition and SetExpressionPosition methods. If one of these methods is called then next generated bytecode will get passed position. It's general treatment for most cases. Unfortunately it doesn't work for Returns: - debugger requires source positions exactly on kReturn bytecode in stepping implementation, - BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn and BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn generates more then one bytecode and general solution will put return position on first generated bytecode, - it's not easy to split BuildReturn function into two parts to allow something like following in BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement since generated bytecodes are actually controlled by execution_control(). ..->BuildReturnPrologue(); ..->SetReturnPosition(stmt); ..->Return(); In this CL we pass ReturnStatement through ExecutionControl and use it for position when we emit return bytecode right here. So this CL only will improve return position for returns inside of non-async functions, I'll address async functions later. [1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/543161/ Change-Id: Iede512c120b00c209990bf50c20e7d23dc0d65db Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560738 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46687}
2017-07-14 17:50:09 +00:00
/* 94 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
]
handlers: [
]
---
snippet: "
var x = 101;
return void(x * 3);
"
frame size: 1
parameter count: 1
bytecode array length: 10
bytecodes: [
/* 30 E> */ B(StackCheck),
/* 42 S> */ B(LdaSmi), I8(101),
B(Star), R(0),
/* 61 S> */ B(MulSmi), I8(3), U8(0),
B(LdaUndefined),
[inspector] improve return position of explicit return in non-async function Goal of this CL: explicit return from non-async function has position after return expression as return position (will unblock [1]). BytecodeArrayBuilder has SetStatementPosition and SetExpressionPosition methods. If one of these methods is called then next generated bytecode will get passed position. It's general treatment for most cases. Unfortunately it doesn't work for Returns: - debugger requires source positions exactly on kReturn bytecode in stepping implementation, - BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn and BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn generates more then one bytecode and general solution will put return position on first generated bytecode, - it's not easy to split BuildReturn function into two parts to allow something like following in BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement since generated bytecodes are actually controlled by execution_control(). ..->BuildReturnPrologue(); ..->SetReturnPosition(stmt); ..->Return(); In this CL we pass ReturnStatement through ExecutionControl and use it for position when we emit return bytecode right here. So this CL only will improve return position for returns inside of non-async functions, I'll address async functions later. [1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/543161/ Change-Id: Iede512c120b00c209990bf50c20e7d23dc0d65db Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560738 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46687}
2017-07-14 17:50:09 +00:00
/* 66 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
]
handlers: [
]
---
snippet: "
var x = 1234;
var y = void (x * x - 1);
return y;
"
Reland: [Interpreter] Move BinaryOp Smi transformation into BytecodeGenerator."" This relands commit d3e9aade0ff24e100621ab451e83f703439ace9e. The original CL was reverted speculatively but didn't cause the buildbot failure. Original change's description: > [Interpreter] Move BinaryOp Smi transformation into BytecodeGenerator. > > Perform the transformation to <BinaryOp>Smi for Binary ops which take Smi > literals in the BytecodeGenerator. This enables us to perform the > transformation for literals on either side for commutative operations, and > Avoids having to do the check on every bytecode in the peephole optimizer. > > In the process, adds Smi bytecode variants for all binary operations, adding > - MulSmi > - DivSmi > - ModSmi > - BitwiseXorSmi > - ShiftRightLogical > > BUG=v8:6194 > > Change-Id: If1484252f5385c16957004b9cac8bfbb1f209219 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466246 > Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44477} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,machenbach@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,mythria@chromium.org,v8-reviews@googlegroups.com,ishell@chromium.org # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago. BUG=v8:6194 Change-Id: I2ccaefa1ce58d3885f5c2648755985c06f25c1d8 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472746 Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44511}
2017-04-10 09:30:51 +00:00
frame size: 2
parameter count: 1
bytecode array length: 17
bytecodes: [
/* 30 E> */ B(StackCheck),
/* 42 S> */ B(Wide), B(LdaSmi), I16(1234),
B(Star), R(0),
/* 64 S> */ B(Mul), R(0), U8(1),
/* 68 E> */ B(SubSmi), I8(1), U8(0),
B(LdaUndefined),
B(Star), R(1),
[inspector] improve return position of explicit return in non-async function Goal of this CL: explicit return from non-async function has position after return expression as return position (will unblock [1]). BytecodeArrayBuilder has SetStatementPosition and SetExpressionPosition methods. If one of these methods is called then next generated bytecode will get passed position. It's general treatment for most cases. Unfortunately it doesn't work for Returns: - debugger requires source positions exactly on kReturn bytecode in stepping implementation, - BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn and BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn generates more then one bytecode and general solution will put return position on first generated bytecode, - it's not easy to split BuildReturn function into two parts to allow something like following in BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement since generated bytecodes are actually controlled by execution_control(). ..->BuildReturnPrologue(); ..->SetReturnPosition(stmt); ..->Return(); In this CL we pass ReturnStatement through ExecutionControl and use it for position when we emit return bytecode right here. So this CL only will improve return position for returns inside of non-async functions, I'll address async functions later. [1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/543161/ Change-Id: Iede512c120b00c209990bf50c20e7d23dc0d65db Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560738 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46687}
2017-07-14 17:50:09 +00:00
/* 83 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
]
handlers: [
]
---
snippet: "
var x = 13;
return ~x;
"
frame size: 1
parameter count: 1
bytecode array length: 8
bytecodes: [
/* 30 E> */ B(StackCheck),
/* 42 S> */ B(LdaSmi), I8(13),
B(Star), R(0),
/* 53 S> */ B(BitwiseNot), U8(0),
[inspector] improve return position of explicit return in non-async function Goal of this CL: explicit return from non-async function has position after return expression as return position (will unblock [1]). BytecodeArrayBuilder has SetStatementPosition and SetExpressionPosition methods. If one of these methods is called then next generated bytecode will get passed position. It's general treatment for most cases. Unfortunately it doesn't work for Returns: - debugger requires source positions exactly on kReturn bytecode in stepping implementation, - BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn and BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn generates more then one bytecode and general solution will put return position on first generated bytecode, - it's not easy to split BuildReturn function into two parts to allow something like following in BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement since generated bytecodes are actually controlled by execution_control(). ..->BuildReturnPrologue(); ..->SetReturnPosition(stmt); ..->Return(); In this CL we pass ReturnStatement through ExecutionControl and use it for position when we emit return bytecode right here. So this CL only will improve return position for returns inside of non-async functions, I'll address async functions later. [1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/543161/ Change-Id: Iede512c120b00c209990bf50c20e7d23dc0d65db Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560738 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46687}
2017-07-14 17:50:09 +00:00
/* 56 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
]
handlers: [
]
---
snippet: "
var x = 13;
return +x;
"
frame size: 1
parameter count: 1
bytecode array length: 8
bytecodes: [
/* 30 E> */ B(StackCheck),
/* 42 S> */ B(LdaSmi), I8(13),
B(Star), R(0),
/* 53 S> */ B(ToNumber), U8(0),
[inspector] improve return position of explicit return in non-async function Goal of this CL: explicit return from non-async function has position after return expression as return position (will unblock [1]). BytecodeArrayBuilder has SetStatementPosition and SetExpressionPosition methods. If one of these methods is called then next generated bytecode will get passed position. It's general treatment for most cases. Unfortunately it doesn't work for Returns: - debugger requires source positions exactly on kReturn bytecode in stepping implementation, - BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn and BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn generates more then one bytecode and general solution will put return position on first generated bytecode, - it's not easy to split BuildReturn function into two parts to allow something like following in BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement since generated bytecodes are actually controlled by execution_control(). ..->BuildReturnPrologue(); ..->SetReturnPosition(stmt); ..->Return(); In this CL we pass ReturnStatement through ExecutionControl and use it for position when we emit return bytecode right here. So this CL only will improve return position for returns inside of non-async functions, I'll address async functions later. [1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/543161/ Change-Id: Iede512c120b00c209990bf50c20e7d23dc0d65db Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560738 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46687}
2017-07-14 17:50:09 +00:00
/* 56 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
]
handlers: [
]
---
snippet: "
var x = 13;
return -x;
"
frame size: 1
parameter count: 1
bytecode array length: 8
bytecodes: [
/* 30 E> */ B(StackCheck),
/* 42 S> */ B(LdaSmi), I8(13),
B(Star), R(0),
/* 53 S> */ B(Negate), U8(0),
[inspector] improve return position of explicit return in non-async function Goal of this CL: explicit return from non-async function has position after return expression as return position (will unblock [1]). BytecodeArrayBuilder has SetStatementPosition and SetExpressionPosition methods. If one of these methods is called then next generated bytecode will get passed position. It's general treatment for most cases. Unfortunately it doesn't work for Returns: - debugger requires source positions exactly on kReturn bytecode in stepping implementation, - BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn and BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn generates more then one bytecode and general solution will put return position on first generated bytecode, - it's not easy to split BuildReturn function into two parts to allow something like following in BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement since generated bytecodes are actually controlled by execution_control(). ..->BuildReturnPrologue(); ..->SetReturnPosition(stmt); ..->Return(); In this CL we pass ReturnStatement through ExecutionControl and use it for position when we emit return bytecode right here. So this CL only will improve return position for returns inside of non-async functions, I'll address async functions later. [1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/543161/ Change-Id: Iede512c120b00c209990bf50c20e7d23dc0d65db Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560738 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46687}
2017-07-14 17:50:09 +00:00
/* 56 S> */ B(Return),
]
constant pool: [
]
handlers: [
]