v8/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-v8-5697.js

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

42 lines
880 B
JavaScript
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2016 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file.
Reland "[osr] Basic support for concurrent OSR" This is a reland of commit 3ce690eef22e1f9fbbafb76269477a6f6df99574 Changed for the reland: - Remove the currently-unused BytecodeArray member to avoid MSAN failures. - s/return/continue/ in optimizing-compile-dispatcher. Original change's description: > [osr] Basic support for concurrent OSR > > This CL adds basic support behind --concurrent-osr, > disabled by default. > > When enabled: > 1) the first OSR request starts a concurrent OSR compile job. > 2) on completion, the code object is inserted into the OSR cache. > 3) the next OSR request picks up the cached code (assuming the request > came from the same JumpLoop bytecode). > > We add a new osr optimization marker on the feedback vector to > track whether an OSR compile is currently in progress. > > One fundamental issue remains: step 3) above is not guaranteed to > hit the same JumpLoop, and a mismatch means the OSR'd code cannot > be installed. This will be addressed in a followup by targeting > specific bytecode offsets for the install request. > > This change is based on fanchen.kong@intel.com's earlier > change crrev.com/c/3369361, thank you! > > Bug: v8:12161 > Change-Id: Ib162906dd4b6ba056f62870aea2990f1369df235 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3548820 > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Jakob Linke <jgruber@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79685} Bug: v8:12161 Change-Id: I48b100e5980c909ec5e79d190aaea730c83e9386 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3565720 Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Linke <jgruber@chromium.org> Auto-Submit: Jakob Linke <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79746}
2022-04-04 13:07:12 +00:00
//
// Flags: --allow-natives-syntax --turbofan --no-use-osr
Reland "[osr] Basic support for concurrent OSR" This is a reland of commit 3ce690eef22e1f9fbbafb76269477a6f6df99574 Changed for the reland: - Remove the currently-unused BytecodeArray member to avoid MSAN failures. - s/return/continue/ in optimizing-compile-dispatcher. Original change's description: > [osr] Basic support for concurrent OSR > > This CL adds basic support behind --concurrent-osr, > disabled by default. > > When enabled: > 1) the first OSR request starts a concurrent OSR compile job. > 2) on completion, the code object is inserted into the OSR cache. > 3) the next OSR request picks up the cached code (assuming the request > came from the same JumpLoop bytecode). > > We add a new osr optimization marker on the feedback vector to > track whether an OSR compile is currently in progress. > > One fundamental issue remains: step 3) above is not guaranteed to > hit the same JumpLoop, and a mismatch means the OSR'd code cannot > be installed. This will be addressed in a followup by targeting > specific bytecode offsets for the install request. > > This change is based on fanchen.kong@intel.com's earlier > change crrev.com/c/3369361, thank you! > > Bug: v8:12161 > Change-Id: Ib162906dd4b6ba056f62870aea2990f1369df235 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3548820 > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Jakob Linke <jgruber@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79685} Bug: v8:12161 Change-Id: I48b100e5980c909ec5e79d190aaea730c83e9386 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3565720 Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Linke <jgruber@chromium.org> Auto-Submit: Jakob Linke <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79746}
2022-04-04 13:07:12 +00:00
//
// Why not OSR? Because it may inline the `store` function into OSR'd code
// below before it has a chance to be optimized, making
// `assertOptimized(store)` fail.
function load(o) {
return o.x;
};
for (var x = 0; x < 1000; ++x) {
%PrepareFunctionForOptimization(load);
load({x});
load({x});
%OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(load);
try {
load();
} catch (e) {
}
}
assertOptimized(load);
function store(o) {
o.x = -1;
};
for (var x = 0; x < 1000; ++x) {
%PrepareFunctionForOptimization(store);
store({x});
store({x});
%OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(store);
try {
store();
} catch (e) {
}
}
assertOptimized(store);