v8/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-v8-9534.js

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

19 lines
416 B
JavaScript
Raw Normal View History

Reland "[compiler] Optionally apply an offset to stack checks" This is a reland of 4a16305b6555c0661645f8f2c9d890798f8d5e84 The original CL adjust only one part of the stack check, namely the comparison of the stack pointer against the stack limit in generated code. There is a second part: Runtime::kStackGuard repeats this check to distinguish between a stack overflow and an interrupt request. This second part in runtime must apply the offset just like in generated code. It is implemented in this reland by the StackCheckOffset operator and a new StackGuardWithGap runtime function. Original change's description: > [compiler] Optionally apply an offset to stack checks > > The motivation behind this change is that the frame size of an optimized > function and its unoptimized version may differ, and deoptimization > may thus trigger a stack overflow. The solution implemented in this CL > is to optionally apply an offset to the stack check s.t. the check > becomes 'sp - offset > limit'. The offset is applied to stack checks at > function-entry, and is set to the difference between the optimized and > unoptimized frame size. > > A caveat: OSR may not be fully handled by this fix since we've already > passed the function-entry stack check. A possible solution would be to > *not* skip creation of function-entry stack checks for inlinees. > > This CL: 1. annotates stack check nodes with the stack check kind, where > kind is one of {function-entry,iteration-body,unknown}. 2. potentially > allocates a temporary register to store the result of the 'sp - offset' > in instruction selection (and switches input registers to 'unique' > mode). 3. Applies the offset in code generation. > > Drive-by: Add src/compiler/globals.h for compiler-specific globals. > > Bug: v8:9534,chromium:1000887 > Change-Id: I257191c4a4978ccb60cfa5805ef421f30f0e9826 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1762521 > Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63701} Bug: v8:9534, chromium:1000887 Change-Id: I71771c281afd7d57c09aa48ea1b182d01e6dee2a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1822037 Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64634}
2019-10-30 08:43:29 +00:00
// Copyright 2019 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file.
// Flags: --allow-natives-syntax --stack-size=100 --ignore-unhandled-promises
Reland "[compiler] Optionally apply an offset to stack checks" This is a reland of 4a16305b6555c0661645f8f2c9d890798f8d5e84 The original CL adjust only one part of the stack check, namely the comparison of the stack pointer against the stack limit in generated code. There is a second part: Runtime::kStackGuard repeats this check to distinguish between a stack overflow and an interrupt request. This second part in runtime must apply the offset just like in generated code. It is implemented in this reland by the StackCheckOffset operator and a new StackGuardWithGap runtime function. Original change's description: > [compiler] Optionally apply an offset to stack checks > > The motivation behind this change is that the frame size of an optimized > function and its unoptimized version may differ, and deoptimization > may thus trigger a stack overflow. The solution implemented in this CL > is to optionally apply an offset to the stack check s.t. the check > becomes 'sp - offset > limit'. The offset is applied to stack checks at > function-entry, and is set to the difference between the optimized and > unoptimized frame size. > > A caveat: OSR may not be fully handled by this fix since we've already > passed the function-entry stack check. A possible solution would be to > *not* skip creation of function-entry stack checks for inlinees. > > This CL: 1. annotates stack check nodes with the stack check kind, where > kind is one of {function-entry,iteration-body,unknown}. 2. potentially > allocates a temporary register to store the result of the 'sp - offset' > in instruction selection (and switches input registers to 'unique' > mode). 3. Applies the offset in code generation. > > Drive-by: Add src/compiler/globals.h for compiler-specific globals. > > Bug: v8:9534,chromium:1000887 > Change-Id: I257191c4a4978ccb60cfa5805ef421f30f0e9826 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1762521 > Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63701} Bug: v8:9534, chromium:1000887 Change-Id: I71771c281afd7d57c09aa48ea1b182d01e6dee2a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1822037 Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64634}
2019-10-30 08:43:29 +00:00
let i = 0;
function f() {
i++;
if (i > 10) {
%PrepareFunctionForOptimization(f);
%OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(f);
}
new Promise(f);
return f.x;
}
f();