v8/test/mjsunit/wasm/exceptions.js

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

682 lines
21 KiB
JavaScript
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2018 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file.
// Flags: --expose-wasm --experimental-wasm-eh --allow-natives-syntax
load("test/mjsunit/wasm/wasm-constants.js");
load("test/mjsunit/wasm/wasm-module-builder.js");
function assertWasmThrows(instance, runtime_id, values, code) {
try {
if (typeof code === 'function') {
code();
} else {
eval(code);
}
} catch (e) {
assertInstanceof(e, WebAssembly.RuntimeError);
var e_runtime_id = %GetWasmExceptionId(e, instance);
assertTrue(Number.isInteger(e_runtime_id));
assertEquals(e_runtime_id, runtime_id);
var e_values = %GetWasmExceptionValues(e);
assertArrayEquals(values, e_values);
return; // Success.
}
throw new MjsUnitAssertionError('Did not throw expected <' + runtime_id +
'> with values: ' + values);
}
// First we just test that "except_ref" local variables are allowed.
(function TestLocalExceptRef() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
builder.addFunction("push_and_drop_except_ref", kSig_v_v)
.addBody([
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprDrop,
]).addLocals({except_count: 1}).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
assertDoesNotThrow(instance.exports.push_and_drop_except_ref);
})();
Reland "Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal." This is a reland of 470a10015d6dc2935e3f21bd6355ab524776f31d Original change's description: > Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal. > > This CL does the first baby steps on moving the current (experimental) > exception handling to match that of the WebAssembly proposal. > > It does the following: > > 1) Use exception tags instead of integers. > > 2) Only handle empty exception signatures (i.e. no values associated > with the exception tag. > > 3) Only handle one catch clause. > > 4) Be sure to rethrow the exception if the exception tag does not match. > > Note: There are many things that need to be fixed, and are too > numerous to list here. However, the code should have TODO's on each > missing parts of the implementation. > > Also note that the code currently doesn't handle nested catch blocks, > nor does it change the throw value being an integer. Rather, the > integer value is still being thrown, and currently is the exception > tag. Therefore, we don't build an exception object. This is the reason > why this CL doesn't handle exceptions that pass values. > > Also, the current implementation still can't handle multiple modules > because tag resolution (between) modules has not be implemented yet. > > Bug: v8:6577 > Change-Id: Id6d08b641b3c42d1eec7d4db582f2dab35406114 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/591910 > Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Karl Schimpf <kschimpf@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47087} Bug: v8:6577 Change-Id: I41c3309827c292cb787681a95aaef7cf9b931835 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/598968 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47100}
2017-08-01 20:56:39 +00:00
// The following method doesn't attempt to catch an raised exception.
(function TestThrowSimple() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except = builder.addException(kSig_v_v);
Reland "Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal." This is a reland of 470a10015d6dc2935e3f21bd6355ab524776f31d Original change's description: > Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal. > > This CL does the first baby steps on moving the current (experimental) > exception handling to match that of the WebAssembly proposal. > > It does the following: > > 1) Use exception tags instead of integers. > > 2) Only handle empty exception signatures (i.e. no values associated > with the exception tag. > > 3) Only handle one catch clause. > > 4) Be sure to rethrow the exception if the exception tag does not match. > > Note: There are many things that need to be fixed, and are too > numerous to list here. However, the code should have TODO's on each > missing parts of the implementation. > > Also note that the code currently doesn't handle nested catch blocks, > nor does it change the throw value being an integer. Rather, the > integer value is still being thrown, and currently is the exception > tag. Therefore, we don't build an exception object. This is the reason > why this CL doesn't handle exceptions that pass values. > > Also, the current implementation still can't handle multiple modules > because tag resolution (between) modules has not be implemented yet. > > Bug: v8:6577 > Change-Id: Id6d08b641b3c42d1eec7d4db582f2dab35406114 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/591910 > Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Karl Schimpf <kschimpf@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47087} Bug: v8:6577 Change-Id: I41c3309827c292cb787681a95aaef7cf9b931835 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/598968 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47100}
2017-08-01 20:56:39 +00:00
builder.addFunction("throw_if_param_not_zero", kSig_i_i)
.addBody([
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprI32Const, 0,
kExprI32Ne,
kExprIf, kWasmStmt,
kExprThrow, except,
Reland "Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal." This is a reland of 470a10015d6dc2935e3f21bd6355ab524776f31d Original change's description: > Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal. > > This CL does the first baby steps on moving the current (experimental) > exception handling to match that of the WebAssembly proposal. > > It does the following: > > 1) Use exception tags instead of integers. > > 2) Only handle empty exception signatures (i.e. no values associated > with the exception tag. > > 3) Only handle one catch clause. > > 4) Be sure to rethrow the exception if the exception tag does not match. > > Note: There are many things that need to be fixed, and are too > numerous to list here. However, the code should have TODO's on each > missing parts of the implementation. > > Also note that the code currently doesn't handle nested catch blocks, > nor does it change the throw value being an integer. Rather, the > integer value is still being thrown, and currently is the exception > tag. Therefore, we don't build an exception object. This is the reason > why this CL doesn't handle exceptions that pass values. > > Also, the current implementation still can't handle multiple modules > because tag resolution (between) modules has not be implemented yet. > > Bug: v8:6577 > Change-Id: Id6d08b641b3c42d1eec7d4db582f2dab35406114 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/591910 > Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Karl Schimpf <kschimpf@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47087} Bug: v8:6577 Change-Id: I41c3309827c292cb787681a95aaef7cf9b931835 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/598968 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47100}
2017-08-01 20:56:39 +00:00
kExprEnd,
kExprI32Const, 1
]).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
Reland "Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal." This is a reland of 470a10015d6dc2935e3f21bd6355ab524776f31d Original change's description: > Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal. > > This CL does the first baby steps on moving the current (experimental) > exception handling to match that of the WebAssembly proposal. > > It does the following: > > 1) Use exception tags instead of integers. > > 2) Only handle empty exception signatures (i.e. no values associated > with the exception tag. > > 3) Only handle one catch clause. > > 4) Be sure to rethrow the exception if the exception tag does not match. > > Note: There are many things that need to be fixed, and are too > numerous to list here. However, the code should have TODO's on each > missing parts of the implementation. > > Also note that the code currently doesn't handle nested catch blocks, > nor does it change the throw value being an integer. Rather, the > integer value is still being thrown, and currently is the exception > tag. Therefore, we don't build an exception object. This is the reason > why this CL doesn't handle exceptions that pass values. > > Also, the current implementation still can't handle multiple modules > because tag resolution (between) modules has not be implemented yet. > > Bug: v8:6577 > Change-Id: Id6d08b641b3c42d1eec7d4db582f2dab35406114 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/591910 > Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Karl Schimpf <kschimpf@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47087} Bug: v8:6577 Change-Id: I41c3309827c292cb787681a95aaef7cf9b931835 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/598968 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47100}
2017-08-01 20:56:39 +00:00
assertEquals(1, instance.exports.throw_if_param_not_zero(0));
assertWasmThrows(instance, except, [], () => instance.exports.throw_if_param_not_zero(10));
assertWasmThrows(instance, except, [], () => instance.exports.throw_if_param_not_zero(-1));
Reland "Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal." This is a reland of 470a10015d6dc2935e3f21bd6355ab524776f31d Original change's description: > Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal. > > This CL does the first baby steps on moving the current (experimental) > exception handling to match that of the WebAssembly proposal. > > It does the following: > > 1) Use exception tags instead of integers. > > 2) Only handle empty exception signatures (i.e. no values associated > with the exception tag. > > 3) Only handle one catch clause. > > 4) Be sure to rethrow the exception if the exception tag does not match. > > Note: There are many things that need to be fixed, and are too > numerous to list here. However, the code should have TODO's on each > missing parts of the implementation. > > Also note that the code currently doesn't handle nested catch blocks, > nor does it change the throw value being an integer. Rather, the > integer value is still being thrown, and currently is the exception > tag. Therefore, we don't build an exception object. This is the reason > why this CL doesn't handle exceptions that pass values. > > Also, the current implementation still can't handle multiple modules > because tag resolution (between) modules has not be implemented yet. > > Bug: v8:6577 > Change-Id: Id6d08b641b3c42d1eec7d4db582f2dab35406114 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/591910 > Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Karl Schimpf <kschimpf@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47087} Bug: v8:6577 Change-Id: I41c3309827c292cb787681a95aaef7cf9b931835 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/598968 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47100}
2017-08-01 20:56:39 +00:00
})();
// Test that empty try/catch blocks work.
(function TestCatchEmptyBlocks() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except = builder.addException(kSig_v_v);
builder.addFunction("catch_empty_try", kSig_v_v)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmStmt,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprEnd,
]).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
assertDoesNotThrow(instance.exports.catch_empty_try);
})();
Reland "Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal." This is a reland of 470a10015d6dc2935e3f21bd6355ab524776f31d Original change's description: > Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal. > > This CL does the first baby steps on moving the current (experimental) > exception handling to match that of the WebAssembly proposal. > > It does the following: > > 1) Use exception tags instead of integers. > > 2) Only handle empty exception signatures (i.e. no values associated > with the exception tag. > > 3) Only handle one catch clause. > > 4) Be sure to rethrow the exception if the exception tag does not match. > > Note: There are many things that need to be fixed, and are too > numerous to list here. However, the code should have TODO's on each > missing parts of the implementation. > > Also note that the code currently doesn't handle nested catch blocks, > nor does it change the throw value being an integer. Rather, the > integer value is still being thrown, and currently is the exception > tag. Therefore, we don't build an exception object. This is the reason > why this CL doesn't handle exceptions that pass values. > > Also, the current implementation still can't handle multiple modules > because tag resolution (between) modules has not be implemented yet. > > Bug: v8:6577 > Change-Id: Id6d08b641b3c42d1eec7d4db582f2dab35406114 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/591910 > Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Karl Schimpf <kschimpf@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47087} Bug: v8:6577 Change-Id: I41c3309827c292cb787681a95aaef7cf9b931835 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/598968 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47100}
2017-08-01 20:56:39 +00:00
// Now that we know throwing works, we test catching the exceptions we raise.
(function TestCatchSimple() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except = builder.addException(kSig_v_v);
Reland "Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal." This is a reland of 470a10015d6dc2935e3f21bd6355ab524776f31d Original change's description: > Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal. > > This CL does the first baby steps on moving the current (experimental) > exception handling to match that of the WebAssembly proposal. > > It does the following: > > 1) Use exception tags instead of integers. > > 2) Only handle empty exception signatures (i.e. no values associated > with the exception tag. > > 3) Only handle one catch clause. > > 4) Be sure to rethrow the exception if the exception tag does not match. > > Note: There are many things that need to be fixed, and are too > numerous to list here. However, the code should have TODO's on each > missing parts of the implementation. > > Also note that the code currently doesn't handle nested catch blocks, > nor does it change the throw value being an integer. Rather, the > integer value is still being thrown, and currently is the exception > tag. Therefore, we don't build an exception object. This is the reason > why this CL doesn't handle exceptions that pass values. > > Also, the current implementation still can't handle multiple modules > because tag resolution (between) modules has not be implemented yet. > > Bug: v8:6577 > Change-Id: Id6d08b641b3c42d1eec7d4db582f2dab35406114 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/591910 > Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Karl Schimpf <kschimpf@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47087} Bug: v8:6577 Change-Id: I41c3309827c292cb787681a95aaef7cf9b931835 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/598968 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47100}
2017-08-01 20:56:39 +00:00
builder.addFunction("simple_throw_catch_to_0_1", kSig_i_i)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmI32,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprI32Eqz,
kExprIf, kWasmStmt,
kExprThrow, except,
Reland "Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal." This is a reland of 470a10015d6dc2935e3f21bd6355ab524776f31d Original change's description: > Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal. > > This CL does the first baby steps on moving the current (experimental) > exception handling to match that of the WebAssembly proposal. > > It does the following: > > 1) Use exception tags instead of integers. > > 2) Only handle empty exception signatures (i.e. no values associated > with the exception tag. > > 3) Only handle one catch clause. > > 4) Be sure to rethrow the exception if the exception tag does not match. > > Note: There are many things that need to be fixed, and are too > numerous to list here. However, the code should have TODO's on each > missing parts of the implementation. > > Also note that the code currently doesn't handle nested catch blocks, > nor does it change the throw value being an integer. Rather, the > integer value is still being thrown, and currently is the exception > tag. Therefore, we don't build an exception object. This is the reason > why this CL doesn't handle exceptions that pass values. > > Also, the current implementation still can't handle multiple modules > because tag resolution (between) modules has not be implemented yet. > > Bug: v8:6577 > Change-Id: Id6d08b641b3c42d1eec7d4db582f2dab35406114 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/591910 > Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Karl Schimpf <kschimpf@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47087} Bug: v8:6577 Change-Id: I41c3309827c292cb787681a95aaef7cf9b931835 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/598968 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47100}
2017-08-01 20:56:39 +00:00
kExprEnd,
kExprI32Const, 42,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprI32Const, 23,
Reland "Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal." This is a reland of 470a10015d6dc2935e3f21bd6355ab524776f31d Original change's description: > Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal. > > This CL does the first baby steps on moving the current (experimental) > exception handling to match that of the WebAssembly proposal. > > It does the following: > > 1) Use exception tags instead of integers. > > 2) Only handle empty exception signatures (i.e. no values associated > with the exception tag. > > 3) Only handle one catch clause. > > 4) Be sure to rethrow the exception if the exception tag does not match. > > Note: There are many things that need to be fixed, and are too > numerous to list here. However, the code should have TODO's on each > missing parts of the implementation. > > Also note that the code currently doesn't handle nested catch blocks, > nor does it change the throw value being an integer. Rather, the > integer value is still being thrown, and currently is the exception > tag. Therefore, we don't build an exception object. This is the reason > why this CL doesn't handle exceptions that pass values. > > Also, the current implementation still can't handle multiple modules > because tag resolution (between) modules has not be implemented yet. > > Bug: v8:6577 > Change-Id: Id6d08b641b3c42d1eec7d4db582f2dab35406114 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/591910 > Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Karl Schimpf <kschimpf@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47087} Bug: v8:6577 Change-Id: I41c3309827c292cb787681a95aaef7cf9b931835 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/598968 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47100}
2017-08-01 20:56:39 +00:00
kExprEnd
]).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
Reland "Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal." This is a reland of 470a10015d6dc2935e3f21bd6355ab524776f31d Original change's description: > Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal. > > This CL does the first baby steps on moving the current (experimental) > exception handling to match that of the WebAssembly proposal. > > It does the following: > > 1) Use exception tags instead of integers. > > 2) Only handle empty exception signatures (i.e. no values associated > with the exception tag. > > 3) Only handle one catch clause. > > 4) Be sure to rethrow the exception if the exception tag does not match. > > Note: There are many things that need to be fixed, and are too > numerous to list here. However, the code should have TODO's on each > missing parts of the implementation. > > Also note that the code currently doesn't handle nested catch blocks, > nor does it change the throw value being an integer. Rather, the > integer value is still being thrown, and currently is the exception > tag. Therefore, we don't build an exception object. This is the reason > why this CL doesn't handle exceptions that pass values. > > Also, the current implementation still can't handle multiple modules > because tag resolution (between) modules has not be implemented yet. > > Bug: v8:6577 > Change-Id: Id6d08b641b3c42d1eec7d4db582f2dab35406114 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/591910 > Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Karl Schimpf <kschimpf@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47087} Bug: v8:6577 Change-Id: I41c3309827c292cb787681a95aaef7cf9b931835 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/598968 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47100}
2017-08-01 20:56:39 +00:00
assertEquals(23, instance.exports.simple_throw_catch_to_0_1(0));
assertEquals(42, instance.exports.simple_throw_catch_to_0_1(1));
Reland "Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal." This is a reland of 470a10015d6dc2935e3f21bd6355ab524776f31d Original change's description: > Start migration of try/throw/catch to match proposal. > > This CL does the first baby steps on moving the current (experimental) > exception handling to match that of the WebAssembly proposal. > > It does the following: > > 1) Use exception tags instead of integers. > > 2) Only handle empty exception signatures (i.e. no values associated > with the exception tag. > > 3) Only handle one catch clause. > > 4) Be sure to rethrow the exception if the exception tag does not match. > > Note: There are many things that need to be fixed, and are too > numerous to list here. However, the code should have TODO's on each > missing parts of the implementation. > > Also note that the code currently doesn't handle nested catch blocks, > nor does it change the throw value being an integer. Rather, the > integer value is still being thrown, and currently is the exception > tag. Therefore, we don't build an exception object. This is the reason > why this CL doesn't handle exceptions that pass values. > > Also, the current implementation still can't handle multiple modules > because tag resolution (between) modules has not be implemented yet. > > Bug: v8:6577 > Change-Id: Id6d08b641b3c42d1eec7d4db582f2dab35406114 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/591910 > Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Karl Schimpf <kschimpf@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47087} Bug: v8:6577 Change-Id: I41c3309827c292cb787681a95aaef7cf9b931835 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/598968 Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47100}
2017-08-01 20:56:39 +00:00
})();
// Test that we can distinguish which exception was thrown by using a cascaded
// sequence of nested try blocks with a single catch block each.
(function TestCatchComplex1() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except1 = builder.addException(kSig_v_v);
let except2 = builder.addException(kSig_v_v);
let except3 = builder.addException(kSig_v_v);
builder.addFunction("catch_complex", kSig_i_i)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmI32,
kExprTry, kWasmI32,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprI32Eqz,
kExprIf, kWasmStmt,
kExprThrow, except1,
kExprElse,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprI32Const, 1,
kExprI32Eq,
kExprIf, kWasmStmt,
kExprThrow, except2,
kExprElse,
kExprThrow, except3,
kExprEnd,
kExprEnd,
kExprI32Const, 2,
kExprCatch, except1,
kExprI32Const, 3,
kExprEnd,
kExprCatch, except2,
kExprI32Const, 4,
kExprEnd,
]).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
assertEquals(3, instance.exports.catch_complex(0));
assertEquals(4, instance.exports.catch_complex(1));
assertWasmThrows(instance, except3, [], () => instance.exports.catch_complex(2));
})();
// Test that we can distinguish which exception was thrown by using a single
// try block with multiple associated catch blocks in sequence.
(function TestCatchComplex2() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except1 = builder.addException(kSig_v_v);
let except2 = builder.addException(kSig_v_v);
let except3 = builder.addException(kSig_v_v);
builder.addFunction("catch_complex", kSig_i_i)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmI32,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprI32Eqz,
kExprIf, kWasmStmt,
kExprThrow, except1,
kExprElse,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprI32Const, 1,
kExprI32Eq,
kExprIf, kWasmStmt,
kExprThrow, except2,
kExprElse,
kExprThrow, except3,
kExprEnd,
kExprEnd,
kExprI32Const, 2,
kExprCatch, except1,
kExprI32Const, 3,
kExprCatch, except2,
kExprI32Const, 4,
kExprEnd,
]).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
assertEquals(3, instance.exports.catch_complex(0));
assertEquals(4, instance.exports.catch_complex(1));
assertWasmThrows(instance, except3, [], () => instance.exports.catch_complex(2));
})();
// Test throwing an exception with multiple values.
(function TestThrowMultipleValues() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except = builder.addException(kSig_v_ii);
builder.addFunction("throw_1_2", kSig_v_v)
.addBody([
kExprI32Const, 1,
kExprI32Const, 2,
kExprThrow, except,
]).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
assertWasmThrows(instance, except, [0, 1, 0, 2], () => instance.exports.throw_1_2());
})();
// Test throwing/catching the i32 parameter value.
(function TestThrowCatchParamI() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except = builder.addException(kSig_v_i);
builder.addFunction("throw_catch_param", kSig_i_i)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmI32,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprThrow, except,
kExprI32Const, 2,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprReturn,
kExprEnd,
]).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
assertEquals(0, instance.exports.throw_catch_param(0));
assertEquals(1, instance.exports.throw_catch_param(1));
assertEquals(10, instance.exports.throw_catch_param(10));
})();
// Test the encoding of a thrown exception with an integer exception.
(function TestThrowParamI() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except = builder.addException(kSig_v_i);
builder.addFunction("throw_param", kSig_v_i)
.addBody([
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprThrow, except,
]).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
assertWasmThrows(instance, except, [0, 5], () => instance.exports.throw_param(5));
assertWasmThrows(instance, except, [6, 31026], () => instance.exports.throw_param(424242));
})();
// Test throwing/catching the f32 parameter value.
(function TestThrowCatchParamF() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except = builder.addException(kSig_v_f);
builder.addFunction("throw_catch_param", kSig_f_f)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmF32,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprThrow, except,
kExprF32Const, 0, 0, 0, 0,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprReturn,
kExprEnd,
]).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
assertEquals(5.0, instance.exports.throw_catch_param(5.0));
assertEquals(10.5, instance.exports.throw_catch_param(10.5));
})();
// Test the encoding of a thrown exception with a float value.
(function TestThrowParamF() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except = builder.addException(kSig_v_f);
builder.addFunction("throw_param", kSig_v_f)
.addBody([
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprThrow, except,
]).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
assertWasmThrows(instance, except, [16544, 0], () => instance.exports.throw_param(5.0));
assertWasmThrows(instance, except, [16680, 0], () => instance.exports.throw_param(10.5));
})();
// Test throwing/catching an I64 value
(function TestThrowCatchParamL() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except = builder.addException(kSig_v_l);
builder.addFunction("throw_catch_param", kSig_i_i)
.addBody([
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprI64UConvertI32,
kExprSetLocal, 1,
kExprTry, kWasmI32,
kExprGetLocal, 1,
kExprThrow, except,
kExprI32Const, 2,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprGetLocal, 1,
kExprI64Eq,
kExprIf, kWasmI32,
kExprI32Const, 1,
kExprElse,
kExprI32Const, 0,
kExprEnd,
// TODO(kschimpf): Why is this return necessary?
kExprReturn,
kExprEnd,
]).addLocals({i64_count: 1}).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
assertEquals(1, instance.exports.throw_catch_param(5));
assertEquals(1, instance.exports.throw_catch_param(0));
assertEquals(1, instance.exports.throw_catch_param(-1));
})();
// Test the encoding of a thrown exception with an I64 value.
(function TestThrowParamL() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except = builder.addException(kSig_v_l);
builder.addFunction("throw_param", kSig_v_ii)
.addBody([
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprI64UConvertI32,
kExprI64Const, 32,
kExprI64Shl,
kExprGetLocal, 1,
kExprI64UConvertI32,
kExprI64Ior,
kExprThrow, except,
]).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
assertWasmThrows(instance, except, [0, 10, 0, 5], () => instance.exports.throw_param(10, 5));
assertWasmThrows(instance, except, [65535, 65535, 0, 13], () => instance.exports.throw_param(-1, 13));
})();
// Test throwing/catching the F64 parameter value
(function TestThrowCatchParamD() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except = builder.addException(kSig_v_d);
builder.addFunction("throw_catch_param", kSig_d_d)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmF64,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprThrow, except,
kExprF64Const, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprReturn,
kExprEnd,
]).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
assertEquals(5.0, instance.exports.throw_catch_param(5.0));
assertEquals(10.5, instance.exports.throw_catch_param(10.5));
})();
// Test the encoding of a thrown exception with an f64 value.
(function TestThrowParamD() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except = builder.addException(kSig_v_d);
builder.addFunction("throw_param", kSig_v_f)
.addBody([
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprF64ConvertF32,
kExprThrow, except,
]).exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate();
assertWasmThrows(instance, except, [16404, 0, 0, 0], () => instance.exports.throw_param(5.0));
assertWasmThrows(instance, except, [16739, 4816, 0, 0], () => instance.exports.throw_param(10000000.5));
})();
// Test the encoding of a computed parameter value.
(function TestThrowParamComputed() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except = builder.addException(kSig_v_i);
builder.addFunction("throw_expr_with_params", kSig_v_ddi)
.addBody([
// p2 * (p0 + min(p0, p1))|0 - 20
kExprGetLocal, 2,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprGetLocal, 1,
kExprF64Min,
kExprF64Add,
kExprI32SConvertF64,
kExprI32Mul,
kExprI32Const, 20,
kExprI32Sub,
kExprThrow, except,
]).exportFunc()
let instance = builder.instantiate();
assertWasmThrows(instance, except, [65535, 65536-8], () => instance.exports.throw_expr_with_params(1.5, 2.5, 4));
assertWasmThrows(instance, except, [0, 12], () => instance.exports.throw_expr_with_params(5.7, 2.5, 4));
})();
// Now that we know catching works locally, we test catching exceptions that
// cross function boundaries and/or raised by JavaScript.
(function TestCatchCrossFunctions() {
print(arguments.callee.name);
let builder = new WasmModuleBuilder();
let except = builder.addException(kSig_v_i);
// Helper function for throwing from JS. It is imported by the Wasm module
// as throw_i.
function throw_value(value) {
throw value;
}
let sig_index = builder.addType(kSig_v_i);
let kJSThrowI = builder.addImport("", "throw_i", sig_index);
// Helper function that throws a string. Wasm should not catch it.
function throw_string() {
throw "use wasm";
}
sig_index = builder.addType(kSig_v_v);
let kJSThrowString = builder.addImport("", "throw_string", sig_index);
// Helper function that throws undefined. Wasm should not catch it.
function throw_undefined() {
throw undefined;
}
let kJSThrowUndefined = builder.addImport("", "throw_undefined", sig_index);
// Helper function that throws an fp. Wasm should not catch it.
function throw_fp() {
throw 10.5;
}
let kJSThrowFP = builder.addImport("", "throw_fp", sig_index);
// Helper function that throws a large number. Wasm should not catch it.
function throw_large() {
throw 1e+28;
}
let kJSThrowLarge = builder.addImport("", "throw_large", sig_index);
// Helper function for throwing from WebAssembly.
let kWasmThrowFunction =
builder.addFunction("throw", kSig_v_i)
.addBody([
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprThrow, except,
])
.index;
// Scenario 1: Throw and catch appear on the same function. This should
// happen in case of inlining, for example.
builder.addFunction("same_scope", kSig_i_i)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmI32,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprI32Const, 0,
kExprI32Ne,
kExprIf, kWasmStmt,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprThrow, except,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprEnd,
kExprI32Const, 63,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprEnd
])
.exportFunc();
builder.addFunction("same_scope_ignore", kSig_i_i)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmI32,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprThrow, except,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprEnd,
])
.exportFunc();
builder.addFunction("same_scope_multiple", kSig_i_i)
// path = 0;
//
// try {
// try {
// try {
// if (p == 1)
// throw 1;
// path |= 2
// } catch (v) {
// path |= v | 4;
// throw path;
// }
// if (p == 2)
// throw path|8;
// path |= 16;
// } catch (v) {
// path |= v | 32;
// throw path;
// }
// if (p == 3)
// throw path|64;
// path |= 128
// } catch (v) {
// path |= v | 256;
// }
//
// return path;
//
// p == 1 -> path == 293
// p == 2 -> path == 298
// p == 3 -> path == 338
// else -> path == 146
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmI32,
kExprTry, kWasmI32,
kExprTry, kWasmI32,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprI32Const, 1,
kExprI32Eq,
kExprIf, kWasmStmt,
kExprI32Const, 1,
kExprThrow, except,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprEnd,
kExprI32Const, 2,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprI32Const, 4,
kExprI32Ior,
kExprThrow, except,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprEnd,
kExprTeeLocal, 1,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprI32Const, 2,
kExprI32Eq,
kExprIf, kWasmStmt,
kExprGetLocal, 1,
kExprI32Const, 8,
kExprI32Ior,
kExprThrow, except,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprEnd,
kExprI32Const, 16,
kExprI32Ior,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprI32Const, 32,
kExprI32Ior,
kExprThrow, except,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprEnd,
kExprTeeLocal, 1,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprI32Const, 3,
kExprI32Eq,
kExprIf, kWasmStmt,
kExprGetLocal, 1,
kExprI32Const, /*64=*/ 192, 0,
kExprI32Ior,
kExprThrow, except,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprEnd,
kExprI32Const, /*128=*/ 128, 1,
kExprI32Ior,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprI32Const, /*256=*/ 128, 2,
kExprI32Ior,
kExprEnd,
])
.addLocals({i32_count: 1})
.exportFunc();
// Scenario 2: Catches an exception raised from the direct callee.
builder.addFunction("from_direct_callee", kSig_i_i)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmI32,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprCallFunction, kWasmThrowFunction,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprEnd,
])
.exportFunc();
// Scenario 3: Catches an exception raised from an indirect callee.
let sig_v_i = builder.addType(kSig_v_i);
builder.appendToTable([kWasmThrowFunction, kWasmThrowFunction]);
builder.addFunction("from_indirect_callee", kSig_i_ii)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmI32,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprGetLocal, 1,
kExprCallIndirect, sig_v_i, kTableZero,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprEnd
])
.exportFunc();
// Scenario 4: Does not catch an exception raised in JS, even if primitive
// values are being used as exceptions.
builder.addFunction("i_from_js", kSig_i_i)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmI32,
kExprGetLocal, 0,
kExprCallFunction, kJSThrowI,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprEnd,
])
.exportFunc();
builder.addFunction("string_from_js", kSig_v_v)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmStmt,
kExprCallFunction, kJSThrowString,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprEnd,
])
.exportFunc();
builder.addFunction("fp_from_js", kSig_v_v)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmStmt,
kExprCallFunction, kJSThrowFP,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprEnd,
])
.exportFunc();
builder.addFunction("large_from_js", kSig_v_v)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmStmt,
kExprCallFunction, kJSThrowLarge,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprEnd,
])
.exportFunc();
builder.addFunction("undefined_from_js", kSig_v_v)
.addBody([
kExprTry, kWasmStmt,
kExprCallFunction, kJSThrowUndefined,
kExprCatch, except,
kExprUnreachable,
kExprEnd,
])
.exportFunc();
let instance = builder.instantiate({"": {
throw_i: throw_value,
throw_string: throw_string,
throw_fp: throw_fp,
throw_large, throw_large,
throw_undefined: throw_undefined
}});
assertEquals(63, instance.exports.same_scope(0));
assertEquals(1024, instance.exports.same_scope(1024));
assertEquals(-3, instance.exports.same_scope(-3));
assertEquals(-1, instance.exports.same_scope_ignore(-1));
assertEquals(1, instance.exports.same_scope_ignore(1));
assertEquals(0x7FFFFFFF, instance.exports.same_scope_ignore(0x7FFFFFFF));
assertEquals(1024, instance.exports.same_scope_ignore(1024));
assertEquals(-1, instance.exports.same_scope_ignore(-1));
assertEquals(293, instance.exports.same_scope_multiple(1));
assertEquals(298, instance.exports.same_scope_multiple(2));
assertEquals(338, instance.exports.same_scope_multiple(3));
assertEquals(146, instance.exports.same_scope_multiple(0));
assertEquals(-10024, instance.exports.from_direct_callee(-10024));
assertEquals(3334333, instance.exports.from_direct_callee(3334333));
assertEquals(-1, instance.exports.from_direct_callee(0xFFFFFFFF));
assertEquals(0x7FFFFFFF, instance.exports.from_direct_callee(0x7FFFFFFF));
assertEquals(10, instance.exports.from_indirect_callee(10, 0));
assertEquals(77, instance.exports.from_indirect_callee(77, 1));
assertThrowsEquals(() => instance.exports.i_from_js(10), 10);
assertThrowsEquals(() => instance.exports.i_from_js(-10), -10);
assertThrowsEquals(instance.exports.string_from_js, "use wasm");
assertThrowsEquals(instance.exports.fp_from_js, 10.5);
assertThrowsEquals(instance.exports.large_from_js, 1e+28);
assertThrowsEquals(instance.exports.undefined_from_js, undefined);
})();