[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
// Copyright 2016 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
|
|
|
|
|
// found in the LICENSE file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "src/compiler/constant-folding-reducer.h"
|
2019-05-21 09:30:15 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "src/codegen/code-factory.h"
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "src/compiler/access-builder.h"
|
2018-07-06 11:05:49 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "src/compiler/compilation-dependencies.h"
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "src/compiler/js-graph.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "src/compiler/js-operator.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "src/compiler/machine-operator.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "src/compiler/node-properties.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "src/compiler/operator-properties.h"
|
2019-05-22 07:55:37 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "src/execution/isolate-inl.h"
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "test/unittests/compiler/compiler-test-utils.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "test/unittests/compiler/graph-unittest.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "test/unittests/compiler/node-test-utils.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "testing/gmock-support.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using testing::IsNaN;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace v8 {
|
|
|
|
|
namespace internal {
|
|
|
|
|
namespace compiler {
|
|
|
|
|
namespace constant_folding_reducer_unittest {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const double kFloat64Values[] = {
|
|
|
|
|
-V8_INFINITY, -4.23878e+275, -5.82632e+265, -6.60355e+220,
|
|
|
|
|
-6.26172e+212, -2.56222e+211, -4.82408e+201, -1.84106e+157,
|
|
|
|
|
-1.63662e+127, -1.55772e+100, -1.67813e+72, -2.3382e+55,
|
|
|
|
|
-3.179e+30, -1.441e+09, -1.0647e+09, -7.99361e+08,
|
|
|
|
|
-5.77375e+08, -2.20984e+08, -32757, -13171,
|
|
|
|
|
-9970, -3984, -107, -105,
|
|
|
|
|
-92, -77, -61, -0.000208163,
|
|
|
|
|
-1.86685e-06, -1.17296e-10, -9.26358e-11, -5.08004e-60,
|
|
|
|
|
-1.74753e-65, -1.06561e-71, -5.67879e-79, -5.78459e-130,
|
|
|
|
|
-2.90989e-171, -7.15489e-243, -3.76242e-252, -1.05639e-263,
|
|
|
|
|
-4.40497e-267, -2.19666e-273, -4.9998e-276, -5.59821e-278,
|
|
|
|
|
-2.03855e-282, -5.99335e-283, -7.17554e-284, -3.11744e-309,
|
|
|
|
|
-0.0, 0.0, 2.22507e-308, 1.30127e-270,
|
|
|
|
|
7.62898e-260, 4.00313e-249, 3.16829e-233, 1.85244e-228,
|
|
|
|
|
2.03544e-129, 1.35126e-110, 1.01182e-106, 5.26333e-94,
|
|
|
|
|
1.35292e-90, 2.85394e-83, 1.78323e-77, 5.4967e-57,
|
|
|
|
|
1.03207e-25, 4.57401e-25, 1.58738e-05, 2,
|
|
|
|
|
125, 2310, 9636, 14802,
|
|
|
|
|
17168, 28945, 29305, 4.81336e+07,
|
|
|
|
|
1.41207e+08, 4.65962e+08, 1.40499e+09, 2.12648e+09,
|
|
|
|
|
8.80006e+30, 1.4446e+45, 1.12164e+54, 2.48188e+89,
|
|
|
|
|
6.71121e+102, 3.074e+112, 4.9699e+152, 5.58383e+166,
|
|
|
|
|
4.30654e+172, 7.08824e+185, 9.6586e+214, 2.028e+223,
|
|
|
|
|
6.63277e+243, 1.56192e+261, 1.23202e+269, 5.72883e+289,
|
|
|
|
|
8.5798e+290, 1.40256e+294, 1.79769e+308, V8_INFINITY};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const double kIntegerValues[] = {-V8_INFINITY, INT_MIN, -1000.0, -42.0,
|
|
|
|
|
-1.0, 0.0, 1.0, 42.0,
|
|
|
|
|
1000.0, INT_MAX, UINT_MAX, V8_INFINITY};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ConstantFoldingReducerTest : public TypedGraphTest {
|
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
|
ConstantFoldingReducerTest()
|
2018-06-07 07:03:46 +00:00
|
|
|
: TypedGraphTest(3),
|
2020-08-12 14:39:53 +00:00
|
|
|
broker_(isolate(), zone()),
|
2018-06-07 07:03:46 +00:00
|
|
|
simplified_(zone()),
|
2019-02-27 18:10:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deps_(&broker_, zone()) {}
|
2018-09-17 11:30:48 +00:00
|
|
|
~ConstantFoldingReducerTest() override = default;
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
protected:
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction Reduce(Node* node) {
|
|
|
|
|
MachineOperatorBuilder machine(zone());
|
|
|
|
|
JSOperatorBuilder javascript(zone());
|
|
|
|
|
JSGraph jsgraph(isolate(), graph(), common(), &javascript, simplified(),
|
|
|
|
|
&machine);
|
2020-09-11 15:42:50 +00:00
|
|
|
GraphReducer graph_reducer(zone(), graph(), tick_counter(), broker());
|
2018-10-12 09:18:57 +00:00
|
|
|
ConstantFoldingReducer reducer(&graph_reducer, &jsgraph, broker());
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
return reducer.Reduce(node);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* UseValue(Node* node) {
|
|
|
|
|
Node* start = graph()->NewNode(common()->Start(1));
|
|
|
|
|
Node* zero = graph()->NewNode(common()->NumberConstant(0));
|
|
|
|
|
return graph()->NewNode(common()->Return(), zero, node, start, start);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
SimplifiedOperatorBuilder* simplified() { return &simplified_; }
|
2018-10-12 09:18:57 +00:00
|
|
|
JSHeapBroker* broker() { return &broker_; }
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
private:
|
2018-10-12 09:18:57 +00:00
|
|
|
JSHeapBroker broker_;
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
SimplifiedOperatorBuilder simplified_;
|
|
|
|
|
CompilationDependencies deps_;
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(ConstantFoldingReducerTest, ParameterWithMinusZero) {
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node = Parameter(
|
|
|
|
|
Type::Constant(broker(), factory()->minus_zero_value(), zone()));
|
|
|
|
|
Node* use_value = UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(r.Changed());
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_THAT(use_value->InputAt(1), IsNumberConstant(-0.0));
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node = Parameter(Type::MinusZero());
|
|
|
|
|
Node* use_value = UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(r.Changed());
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_THAT(use_value->InputAt(1), IsNumberConstant(-0.0));
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node = Parameter(Type::Union(
|
2018-05-25 14:41:13 +00:00
|
|
|
Type::MinusZero(),
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Type::Constant(broker(), factory()->NewNumber(0), zone()), zone()));
|
|
|
|
|
UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(r.Changed());
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(ConstantFoldingReducerTest, ParameterWithNull) {
|
|
|
|
|
Handle<HeapObject> null = factory()->null_value();
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node = Parameter(Type::Constant(broker(), null, zone()));
|
|
|
|
|
Node* use_value = UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(r.Changed());
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_THAT(use_value->InputAt(1), IsHeapConstant(null));
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node = Parameter(Type::Null());
|
|
|
|
|
Node* use_value = UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(r.Changed());
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_THAT(use_value->InputAt(1), IsHeapConstant(null));
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(ConstantFoldingReducerTest, ParameterWithNaN) {
|
|
|
|
|
const double kNaNs[] = {-std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN(),
|
|
|
|
|
std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN(),
|
|
|
|
|
std::numeric_limits<double>::signaling_NaN()};
|
|
|
|
|
TRACED_FOREACH(double, nan, kNaNs) {
|
|
|
|
|
Handle<Object> constant = factory()->NewNumber(nan);
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node = Parameter(Type::Constant(broker(), constant, zone()));
|
|
|
|
|
Node* use_value = UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(r.Changed());
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_THAT(use_value->InputAt(1), IsNumberConstant(IsNaN()));
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node =
|
|
|
|
|
Parameter(Type::Constant(broker(), factory()->nan_value(), zone()));
|
|
|
|
|
Node* use_value = UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(r.Changed());
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_THAT(use_value->InputAt(1), IsNumberConstant(IsNaN()));
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node = Parameter(Type::NaN());
|
|
|
|
|
Node* use_value = UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(r.Changed());
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_THAT(use_value->InputAt(1), IsNumberConstant(IsNaN()));
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(ConstantFoldingReducerTest, ParameterWithPlainNumber) {
|
|
|
|
|
TRACED_FOREACH(double, value, kFloat64Values) {
|
|
|
|
|
Handle<Object> constant = factory()->NewNumber(value);
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node = Parameter(Type::Constant(broker(), constant, zone()));
|
|
|
|
|
Node* use_value = UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(r.Changed());
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_THAT(use_value->InputAt(1), IsNumberConstant(value));
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
TRACED_FOREACH(double, value, kIntegerValues) {
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node = Parameter(Type::Range(value, value, zone()));
|
|
|
|
|
Node* use_value = UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(r.Changed());
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_THAT(use_value->InputAt(1), IsNumberConstant(value));
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(ConstantFoldingReducerTest, ParameterWithUndefined) {
|
|
|
|
|
Handle<HeapObject> undefined = factory()->undefined_value();
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node = Parameter(Type::Undefined());
|
|
|
|
|
Node* use_value = UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(r.Changed());
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_THAT(use_value->InputAt(1), IsUndefinedConstant());
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node = Parameter(Type::Constant(broker(), undefined, zone()));
|
|
|
|
|
Node* use_value = UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(r.Changed());
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_THAT(use_value->InputAt(1), IsUndefinedConstant());
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
// ToBoolean
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(ConstantFoldingReducerTest, ToBooleanWithFalsish) {
|
|
|
|
|
Node* input = Parameter(
|
|
|
|
|
Type::Union(
|
|
|
|
|
Type::MinusZero(),
|
|
|
|
|
Type::Union(
|
|
|
|
|
Type::NaN(),
|
|
|
|
|
Type::Union(
|
|
|
|
|
Type::Null(),
|
|
|
|
|
Type::Union(
|
|
|
|
|
Type::Undefined(),
|
|
|
|
|
Type::Union(
|
|
|
|
|
Type::Undetectable(),
|
2018-10-12 09:18:57 +00:00
|
|
|
Type::Union(
|
2020-03-12 07:31:47 +00:00
|
|
|
Type::Constant(broker(), factory()->false_value(),
|
|
|
|
|
zone()),
|
2018-10-12 09:18:57 +00:00
|
|
|
Type::Range(0.0, 0.0, zone()), zone()),
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
zone()),
|
|
|
|
|
zone()),
|
|
|
|
|
zone()),
|
|
|
|
|
zone()),
|
|
|
|
|
zone()),
|
|
|
|
|
0);
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node = graph()->NewNode(simplified()->ToBoolean(), input);
|
|
|
|
|
Node* use_value = UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(r.Changed());
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_THAT(use_value->InputAt(1), IsFalseConstant());
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(ConstantFoldingReducerTest, ToBooleanWithTruish) {
|
|
|
|
|
Node* input = Parameter(
|
|
|
|
|
Type::Union(
|
2020-03-12 07:31:47 +00:00
|
|
|
Type::Constant(broker(), factory()->true_value(), zone()),
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
Type::Union(Type::DetectableReceiver(), Type::Symbol(), zone()),
|
|
|
|
|
zone()),
|
|
|
|
|
0);
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node = graph()->NewNode(simplified()->ToBoolean(), input);
|
|
|
|
|
Node* use_value = UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(r.Changed());
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_THAT(use_value->InputAt(1), IsTrueConstant());
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(ConstantFoldingReducerTest, ToBooleanWithNonZeroPlainNumber) {
|
|
|
|
|
Node* input = Parameter(Type::Range(1, V8_INFINITY, zone()), 0);
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Node* node = graph()->NewNode(simplified()->ToBoolean(), input);
|
|
|
|
|
Node* use_value = UseValue(node);
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction r = Reduce(node);
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(r.Changed());
|
2020-03-17 08:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_THAT(use_value->InputAt(1), IsTrueConstant());
|
[turbofan] Optimize array destructuring
This CL introduces type narrowing and constant folding reducers
to constant fold code that comes out of inlined destructuring
of arrays. In particular, array iterator introduces code that
contains a phi of a temporary array that blocks escape analysis.
The phi comes from conditional that can be evaluated statically
(i.e., constant folded), so with better constant folding we
allow escape analysis to get rid of the temporary array.
On a quick micro-benchmark below, we see more than 6x improvement.
This is close to the hand-optimized version - if we replace
body of f with 'return b + a', we get 220ms (versus 218ms with
destructuring).
function f(a, b) {
[b, a] = [a, b];
return a + b;
}
function sum(count) {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
s += f(1, 2);
}
return s;
}
// Warm up
sum(1e5); sum(1e5);
console.time("destructure array");
sum(1e8);
console.timeEnd("destructure array");
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 213.526000
console.timeEnd: destructure array, 1503.537000
Bug: v8:7728
Change-Id: Ib7aec1d5897989e6adb1af1eddd516d8b3866db5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1047672
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53048}
2018-05-07 20:45:11 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace constant_folding_reducer_unittest
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace compiler
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace internal
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace v8
|
